Athlete · Open Men · 35-39 · GBR GBR

Nathaniel Scott

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/nathaniel-scott-3e3cde80

10 HYROX races over 3 seasons: 6 solo, 4 in a team with 2 partners.

Best Open Men time1:11:34Birmingham Oct Birm
Best Open Men place695thof 3,831 · Birmingham Oct Birm
Latest race1:00:58Birmingham Oct Birm · Pro Doubles Men with Jack WilliamsNathaniel's best Pro Doubles Men time so far
Strongest part of the raceWall ballsfaster than 89% of Open Men at Birmingham Oct Birm
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Finish time, race by race: one race type at a time

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:12:001:14:001:16:001:18:001:20:00 best 1:11:34

This line shows the finish time of Nathaniel Scott at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:11:34 at Birmingham (Oct 2026); Nathaniel Scott was 10:21 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Birmingham Oct 2024 Open Men 1:21:55
London May 2025 Open Men 1:16:33
Birmingham Oct 2025 Open Men 1:19:43
London ExCeL Dec 2025 Open Men 1:19:00
Manchester Jan 2026 Open Men 1:20:39
Birmingham Oct 2026 Open Men 1:11:34

Each dot is one Open Men race; click one for that race's report. From the first Open Men race to the best: 10:21 faster (1:21:55 to 1:11:34).

Every race

10 results at 9 races

Tap a result for its full report
Birmingham Oct Birm 27–31 Oct 2026 · 2 results
Race results
Open Men, 35-39 1:11:34 695th of 3,831; 171st of 759 aged 35-39 34:23 31:55 5:21 Runs 34:23 · Stations 31:55 · Roxzone 5:21

695th of 3,831 Open Men (faster than 81%). Against the 118 who finished around 1:12:26: most time gained on wall balls (0:43), most lost on burpee broad jump (0:48). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:19 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:20 more).

Nathaniel Scott at HYROX Birmingham Oct Birm, Open Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Men at this race, and the share of the 3,831 Open Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,831 Open Men here
Run 1: 4:23 5:09 faster than 87%
SkiErg: 4:16 4:33 faster than 86%
Run 2: 3:55 4:31 faster than 83%
Sled push: 3:16 3:20 faster than 54%
Run 3: 4:05 4:51 faster than 87%
Sled pull: 3:40 4:36 faster than 85%
Run 4: 4:11 4:51 faster than 82%
Burpee broad jump: 5:13 5:33 faster than 57%
Run 5: 4:24 4:59 faster than 77%
Row: 4:27 4:48 faster than 86%
Run 6: 4:22 4:52 faster than 73%
Farmers carry: 1:49 2:08 faster than 76%
Run 7: 4:26 4:52 faster than 72%
Sandbag lunges: 4:21 5:08 faster than 74%
Run 8: 4:41 5:11 faster than 70%
Wall balls: 4:53 7:05 faster than 89%
Roxzone: 5:21 6:25 faster than 77%
Runs (8 km) 34:23 39:20 faster than 80%
Stations (8) 31:55
Finish 1:11:34 1:24:06 695th of 3,831 · faster than 81%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Doubles Men, team 30-34, with Jack Williams 1:00:58 153rd of 475; 49th of 115 aged 30-34 32:21 24:20 4:22 Runs 32:21 · Stations 24:20 · Roxzone 4:22

153rd of 475 Pro Doubles Men (faster than 67%).

Nathaniel Scott at HYROX Birmingham Oct Birm, Pro Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 475 Pro Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 475 Pro Doubles Men here
Run 1: 4:01 4:30 faster than 86%
SkiErg: 3:43 3:50 faster than 71%
Run 2: 3:43 3:54 faster than 67%
Sled push: 2:28 2:17 faster than 28%
Run 3: 4:03 4:11 faster than 59%
Sled pull: 3:33 3:46 faster than 65%
Run 4: 4:04 4:09 faster than 54%
Burpee broad jump: 2:24 2:39 faster than 67%
Run 5: 4:05 4:11 faster than 55%
Row: 3:56 4:09 faster than 81%
Run 6: 4:04 4:06 faster than 51%
Farmers carry: 1:31 1:34 faster than 63%
Run 7: 4:16 4:12 faster than 46%
Sandbag lunges: 3:01 3:17 faster than 67%
Run 8: — 4:12
Wall balls: 3:44 4:05 faster than 78%
Roxzone: 4:22 4:44 faster than 70%
Runs (8 km) 32:21 33:35 faster than 60%
Stations (8) 24:20
Finish 1:00:58 1:03:53 153rd of 475 · faster than 67%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Men, team 30-34, with Jack Williams 58:56 92nd of 2,268; 32nd of 465 aged 30-34 34:03 22:25 2:28† Runs 34:03 · Stations 22:25 · Roxzone 2:28

92nd of 2,268 Doubles Men (faster than 95%). Against the 69 who finished around 59:33: most time gained on sled pull (0:24), most lost on the eight runs (0:10). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:23 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:41 more).

Nathaniel Scott at HYROX Cardiff 2026, Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 2,268 Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,268 Doubles Men here
Run 1: 4:11 5:14 faster than 96%
SkiErg: 3:44 4:05 faster than 95%
Run 2: 3:55 4:47 faster than 94%
Sled push: 1:44 1:50 faster than 64%
Run 3: 4:09 5:06 faster than 93%
Sled pull: 2:04 2:57 faster than 98%
Run 4: 4:07 5:06 faster than 94%
Burpee broad jump: 2:46 3:23 faster than 83%
Run 5: 4:17 5:14 faster than 92%
Row: 4:02 4:30 faster than 95%
Run 6: 4:33 5:25 faster than 89%
Farmers carry: 1:49 2:06 faster than 83%
Run 7: 4:06 4:53 faster than 89%
Sandbag lunges: 2:46 3:27 faster than 88%
Run 8: 4:49 5:52 faster than 91%
Wall balls: 3:30 4:16 faster than 96%
Roxzone †: 2:28
Runs (8 km) 34:03 41:51 faster than 94%
Stations (8) 22:25
Finish 58:56 1:12:23 92nd of 2,268 · faster than 95%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Doubles Men, team 30-34, with Jack Williams 1:02:26 145th of 484; 48th of 131 aged 30-34 33:29 24:36 4:26 Runs 33:29 · Stations 24:36 · Roxzone 4:26

145th of 484 Pro Doubles Men (faster than 70%).

Nathaniel Scott at HYROX London Olympia 2026, Pro Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 484 Pro Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 484 Pro Doubles Men here
Run 1: 3:58 4:13 faster than 66%
SkiErg: 3:34 3:45 faster than 86%
Run 2: 3:48 4:02 faster than 68%
Sled push: 2:03 2:12 faster than 70%
Run 3: 4:00 4:17 faster than 71%
Sled pull: 3:15 3:39 faster than 78%
Run 4: 3:51 4:16 faster than 78%
Burpee broad jump: 2:40 2:38 faster than 48%
Run 5: 4:02 4:20 faster than 70%
Row: 4:02 4:10 faster than 73%
Run 6: 4:06 4:17 faster than 62%
Farmers carry: 1:52 1:41 faster than 18%
Run 7: 4:07 4:19 faster than 65%
Sandbag lunges: 3:22 3:33 faster than 61%
Run 8: 5:40 5:51 faster than 58%
Wall balls: 3:48 4:16 faster than 82%
Roxzone: 4:26 4:29 faster than 52%
Runs (8 km) 33:29 35:42 faster than 69%
Stations (8) 24:36
Finish 1:02:26 1:06:24 145th of 484 · faster than 70%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Men, 35-39 1:20:39 1079th of 2,544; 222nd of 501 aged 35-39 40:05 36:22 4:17 Runs 40:05 · Stations 36:22 · Roxzone 4:17

1,079th of 2,544 Open Men (faster than 57%). Against the 79 who finished around 1:19:47: most time gained on the roxzone (0:39), most lost on burpee broad jump (1:00). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:26 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:48 more).

Nathaniel Scott at HYROX Manchester 2026, Open Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Men at this race, and the share of the 2,544 Open Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,544 Open Men here
Run 1: 3:23 3:35 faster than 64%
SkiErg: 4:02 4:23 faster than 93%
Run 2: 5:01 5:04 faster than 52%
Sled push: 2:45 2:43 faster than 47%
Run 3: 5:11 5:26 faster than 61%
Sled pull: 3:57 4:25 faster than 70%
Run 4: 5:16 5:29 faster than 59%
Burpee broad jump: 6:04 5:27 faster than 36%
Run 5: 5:28 5:38 faster than 56%
Row: 4:45 4:44 faster than 49%
Run 6: 5:30 5:31 faster than 51%
Farmers carry: 2:23 2:10 faster than 35%
Run 7: 5:45 5:29 faster than 39%
Sandbag lunges: 5:01 5:23 faster than 60%
Run 8: 4:34 4:44 faster than 58%
Wall balls: 7:25 7:00 faster than 43%
Roxzone: 4:17 5:26 faster than 77%
Runs (8 km) 40:05 41:15 faster than 57%
Stations (8) 36:22
Finish 1:20:39 1:24:01 1079th of 2,544 · faster than 57%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Men, 35-39 1:19:00 2144th of 5,554; 447th of 1,120 aged 35-39 32:38* 35:29* 10:58 Runs 32:38 · Stations 35:29 · Roxzone 10:58

2,144th of 5,554 Open Men (faster than 61%). Against the 169 who finished around 1:19:28: most time gained on sandbag lunges (0:31), most lost on burpee broad jump (0:30). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:34 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 3:01 more).

Nathaniel Scott at HYROX London ExCeL 2025, Open Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Men at this race, and the share of the 5,554 Open Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 5,554 Open Men here
Run 1: 3:01 3:13 faster than 66%
SkiErg: 4:34 4:50 faster than 80%
Run 2: 3:40 3:46 faster than 56%
Sled push: 2:46 2:48 faster than 53%
Run 3: 3:52 4:00 faster than 58%
Sled pull: 4:27 4:47 faster than 63%
Run 4: 4:00 4:02 faster than 52%
Burpee broad jump: 5:49 5:30 faster than 42%
Run 5: 4:02 4:09 faster than 57%
Row: 4:53 4:56 faster than 55%
Run 6: 4:00 4:04 faster than 54%
Farmers carry: 2:04 2:03 faster than 48%
Run 7: 4:05 4:05 faster than 50%
Sandbag lunges: 4:23 5:09 faster than 74%
Run 8: 6:02 5:55 faster than 46%
Wall balls: 6:33 7:20 faster than 62%
Roxzone: 10:58 11:44 faster than 63%
Runs (8 km) 32:38 33:23 faster than 55%
Stations (8) 35:29
Finish 1:19:00 1:23:09 2144th of 5,554 · faster than 61%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Men, 35-39 1:19:43 1437th of 3,945; 332nd of 812 aged 35-39 36:33 37:05 6:10 Runs 36:33 · Stations 37:05 · Roxzone 6:10

1,437th of 3,945 Open Men (faster than 63%). Against the 122 who finished around 1:19:18: most time gained on the eight runs (0:58), most lost on wall balls (1:24). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:23 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:18 more).

Nathaniel Scott at HYROX Birmingham 2025, Open Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Men at this race, and the share of the 3,945 Open Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,945 Open Men here
Run 1: 4:44 5:18 faster than 77%
SkiErg: 4:09 4:30 faster than 91%
Run 2: 4:07 4:33 faster than 74%
Sled push: 2:53 3:15 faster than 67%
Run 3: 4:19 4:53 faster than 77%
Sled pull: 4:07 5:02 faster than 82%
Run 4: 4:27 4:55 faster than 72%
Burpee broad jump: 5:29 5:36 faster than 53%
Run 5: 4:42 5:05 faster than 68%
Row: 4:51 4:49 faster than 47%
Run 6: 4:39 4:55 faster than 64%
Farmers carry: 2:34 2:09 faster than 25%
Run 7: 4:42 4:55 faster than 61%
Sandbag lunges: 5:08 5:12 faster than 52%
Run 8: 4:57 5:10 faster than 59%
Wall balls: 7:54 7:15 faster than 40%
Roxzone: 6:10 6:40 faster than 61%
Runs (8 km) 36:33 39:57 faster than 70%
Stations (8) 37:05
Finish 1:19:43 1:25:13 1437th of 3,945 · faster than 63%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Men, 30-34 1:16:33 639th of 1,917; 161st of 443 aged 30-34 36:49 35:01 4:47 Runs 36:49 · Stations 35:01 · Roxzone 4:47

639th of 1,917 Open Men (faster than 66%). Against the 58 who finished around 1:17:03: most time gained on the eight runs (0:59), most lost on wall balls (1:33). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:26 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:06 more).

Nathaniel Scott at HYROX London 2025, Open Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Men at this race, and the share of the 1,917 Open Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,917 Open Men here
Run 1: 4:19 4:36 faster than 67%
SkiErg: 4:09 4:21 faster than 81%
Run 2: 4:10 4:30 faster than 71%
Sled push: 2:12 2:48 faster than 93%
Run 3: 4:19 4:49 faster than 76%
Sled pull: 4:10 4:20 faster than 57%
Run 4: 4:25 4:49 faster than 71%
Burpee broad jump: 5:05 5:16 faster than 55%
Run 5: 4:34 4:58 faster than 71%
Row: 4:28 4:40 faster than 75%
Run 6: 4:35 4:52 faster than 66%
Farmers carry: 2:16 2:09 faster than 40%
Run 7: 4:34 4:55 faster than 68%
Sandbag lunges: 4:26 5:07 faster than 71%
Run 8: 5:57 6:28 faster than 68%
Wall balls: 8:15 7:10 faster than 32%
Roxzone: 4:47 5:21 faster than 69%
Runs (8 km) 36:49 40:08 faster than 72%
Stations (8) 35:01
Finish 1:16:33 1:22:11 639th of 1,917 · faster than 66%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Doubles Men, team 30-39, with Eugene Patterson 1:08:10 137th of 209; 78th of 118 aged 30-39 37:09 27:14 3:50 Runs 37:09 · Stations 27:14 · Roxzone 3:50

137th of 209 Pro Doubles Men (faster than 34%).

Nathaniel Scott at HYROX Glasgow 2025, Pro Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 209 Pro Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 209 Pro Doubles Men here
Run 1: 3:17 3:13 faster than 42%
SkiErg: 3:54 3:42 faster than 13%
Run 2: 4:39 4:27 faster than 37%
Sled push: 2:01 2:01 faster than 50%
Run 3: 4:55 4:46 faster than 40%
Sled pull: 3:36 3:32 faster than 46%
Run 4: 5:01 4:45 faster than 34%
Burpee broad jump: 2:58 2:31 faster than 22%
Run 5: 5:08 4:51 faster than 37%
Row: 4:33 4:04 faster than 10%
Run 6: 4:53 4:45 faster than 44%
Farmers carry: 1:36 1:33 faster than 44%
Run 7: 5:12 4:50 faster than 33%
Sandbag lunges: 4:01 3:22 faster than 19%
Run 8: 4:07 3:51 faster than 35%
Wall balls: 4:35 4:00 faster than 18%
Roxzone: 3:50 3:46 faster than 44%
Runs (8 km) 37:09 35:36 faster than 38%
Stations (8) 27:14
Finish 1:08:10 1:04:22 137th of 209 · faster than 34%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Men, 30-34 1:21:55 1097th of 2,732; 259th of 557 aged 30-34 41:04 34:01 6:54 Runs 41:04 · Stations 34:01 · Roxzone 6:54

1,097th of 2,732 Open Men (faster than 59%). Against the 83 who finished around 1:21:54: most time gained on sled pull (0:56), most lost on the eight runs (1:38). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:12 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:54 more).

Nathaniel Scott at HYROX Birmingham 2024, Open Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Men at this race, and the share of the 2,732 Open Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,732 Open Men here
Run 1: 5:13 5:16 faster than 53%
SkiErg: 4:06 4:23 faster than 88%
Run 2: 4:41 4:36 faster than 45%
Sled push: 2:15 2:51 faster than 90%
Run 3: 5:00 4:54 faster than 44%
Sled pull: 3:46 4:53 faster than 89%
Run 4: 5:05 4:58 faster than 43%
Burpee broad jump: 4:59 5:51 faster than 70%
Run 5: 5:16 5:10 faster than 45%
Row: 4:33 4:46 faster than 73%
Run 6: 5:07 5:02 faster than 45%
Farmers carry: 2:20 2:06 faster than 33%
Run 7: 5:07 5:02 faster than 45%
Sandbag lunges: 4:59 5:05 faster than 53%
Run 8: 5:40 5:32 faster than 45%
Wall balls: 7:03 6:43 faster than 43%
Roxzone: 6:54 7:31 faster than 63%
Runs (8 km) 41:04 40:42 faster than 47%
Stations (8) 34:01
Finish 1:21:55 1:25:29 1097th of 2,732 · faster than 59%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. † This venue did not time the roxzone: the figure is the finish minus runs and stations, and part of the walk is inside the run laps there, so it is shorter than at other venues. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Open Men

The fastest Nathaniel has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:02 Manchester 2026 · best of 6 4:34
Sled push 2:12 London 2025 · best of 6 3:04
Sled pull 3:40 Birmingham Oct Birm · best of 6 4:57
Burpee broad jump 4:59 Birmingham 2024 · best of 6 5:38
Row 4:27 Birmingham Oct Birm · best of 6 4:53
Farmers carry 1:49 Birmingham Oct Birm · best of 6 2:11
Sandbag lunges 4:21 Birmingham Oct Birm · best of 6 5:20
Wall balls 4:53 Birmingham Oct Birm · best of 6 7:03
Runs (8 km) 32:38 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 6 41:47
Roxzone 4:17 Manchester 2026 · best of 6 7:23
How to read

Each station's best across Nathaniel's Open Men races, from different races, against the typical Open Men split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

2 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Men race

Birmingham Oct Birm, against 3,831 Open Men

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Nathanieledge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Nathaniel sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Wall balls (faster than 89% of the field), weakest on Push (faster than 55%).

See the numbers
Part Nathaniel: faster than
Ski 87%
Push 55%
Pull 86%
BBJ 58%
Row 86%
Carry 77%
Lunges 75%
Wall balls 89%
Roxzone 78%
Runs 81%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 87%
Sled push faster than 55%
Sled pull faster than 86%
Burpee broad jump faster than 58%
Row faster than 86%
Farmers carry faster than 77%
Sandbag lunges faster than 75%
Wall balls faster than 89%
Roxzone faster than 78%
Runs (8 km) faster than 81%

How much of the field Nathaniel beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Wall balls (faster than 89%); weakest: Sled push (faster than 55%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:17 faster
Sled push 0:04 faster
Sled pull 0:56 faster
Burpee broad jump 0:20 faster
Row 0:21 faster
Farmers carry 0:19 faster
Sandbag lunges 0:47 faster
Wall balls 2:12 faster
Roxzone 1:04 faster
Runs (8 km) 4:57 faster

Nathaniel's time on each part against the typical Open Men finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (4:57 faster); weakest: Sled push (0:04 faster).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Men finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Nathaniel against the typical Open Men finisher

Nathaniel1:11:34
4:234:163:553:164:053:404:115:134:244:274:221:494:264:214:414:535:21
Typical Open Men1:22:52
5:094:334:313:204:514:364:515:334:594:484:522:084:525:085:117:056:25
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Nathaniel: 34:26 running, 31:56 at the stations and 5:21 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (5:13).Below, Typical Open Men: 39:16 running, 37:11 at the stations and 6:25 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (7:05).

See the numbers
Part Nathaniel Typical Open Men
Run 1 4:23 5:09
SkiErg 4:16 4:33
Run 2 3:55 4:31
Sled push 3:16 3:20
Run 3 4:05 4:51
Sled pull 3:40 4:36
Run 4 4:11 4:51
Burpee broad jump 5:13 5:33
Run 5 4:24 4:59
Row 4:27 4:48
Run 6 4:22 4:52
Farmers carry 1:49 2:08
Run 7 4:26 4:52
Sandbag lunges 4:21 5:08
Run 8 4:41 5:11
Wall balls 4:53 7:05
Roxzone 5:21 6:25
Finish 1:11:34 1:24:06

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Training for the next one? Let's beat 1:11:34.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report