Athlete · Pro Women · 40-44 · NED NED

Irma van de Pol

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/irma-van-de-pol-2d8959da

19 HYROX races over 2 seasons: 5 solo, 14 in a team with 12 partners. 3 wins and 4 podium finishes, 1 age-group win.

Best Pro Women time1:19:16Rotterdam 2026
Best Pro Women place46thof 180 · Utrecht 2025
Latest race1:11:00Stockholm 2026 · Pro Doubles Women with Clio Scholing4:59 slower than Irma's best Pro Doubles Women time (1:06:01)
Strongest part of the raceFarmers carryfaster than 97% of Pro Women at Rotterdam 2026
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Finish time, race by race: one race type at a time

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:20:001:21:001:22:001:23:001:24:00 best 1:19:16 best 1:19:16 · Rotterdam

This line shows the finish time of Irma van de Pol at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:19:16 at Rotterdam (Apr 2026); Irma van de Pol was 5:26 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Utrecht Nov 2025 Pro Women 1:24:42
Mechelen Mar 2026 Pro Women 1:21:01
Rotterdam Apr 2026 Pro Women 1:19:16

Each dot is one Pro Women race; click one for that race's report. From the first Pro Women race to the best: 5:26 faster (1:24:42 to 1:19:16).

Every race

19 results at 13 races

Tap a result for its full report
Pro Doubles Women, team 45-49, with Clio Scholing 1:11:00 394th of 689; 21st of 80 aged 45-49 38:25 26:47 5:52 Runs 38:25 · Stations 26:47 · Roxzone 5:52

394th of 689 Pro Doubles Women (faster than 42%).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Stockholm 2026, Pro Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 689 Pro Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 689 Pro Doubles Women here
Run 1: 2:48 2:49 faster than 54%
SkiErg: 4:03 4:16 faster than 86%
Run 2: 4:36 4:29 faster than 39%
Sled push: 2:17 2:32 faster than 75%
Run 3: 4:56 4:48 faster than 40%
Sled pull: 3:47 3:53 faster than 57%
Run 4: 4:58 4:47 faster than 37%
Burpee broad jump: 3:18 3:13 faster than 45%
Run 5: 5:05 4:53 faster than 34%
Row: 4:35 4:45 faster than 76%
Run 6: 5:13 4:54 faster than 29%
Farmers carry: 1:35 1:44 faster than 83%
Run 7: 5:12 4:58 faster than 35%
Sandbag lunges: 3:29 3:22 faster than 43%
Run 8: 5:40 5:05 faster than 19%
Wall balls: 3:43 3:53 faster than 65%
Roxzone: 5:52 5:12 faster than 25%
Runs (8 km) 38:25 36:40 faster than 34%
Stations (8) 26:47
Finish 1:11:00 1:09:38 394th of 689 · faster than 42%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Doubles Women, team 45-49, with Clio Scholing 1:06:01 28th of 231; 2nd of 12 aged 45-49 35:05 25:08 5:53 Runs 35:05 · Stations 25:08 · Roxzone 5:53

28th of 231 Pro Doubles Women (faster than 88%).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Heerenveen 2026, Pro Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 231 Pro Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 231 Pro Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:03 4:48 faster than 81%
SkiErg: 4:02 4:24 faster than 95%
Run 2: 4:13 5:00 faster than 80%
Sled push: 2:07 2:25 faster than 87%
Run 3: 4:19 5:20 faster than 83%
Sled pull: 3:22 3:49 faster than 82%
Run 4: 4:23 5:16 faster than 80%
Burpee broad jump: 2:50 3:39 faster than 92%
Run 5: 4:26 5:19 faster than 81%
Row: 4:30 4:50 faster than 88%
Run 6: 4:28 5:20 faster than 80%
Farmers carry: 1:45 1:54 faster than 76%
Run 7: 4:34 5:21 faster than 76%
Sandbag lunges: 3:02 3:57 faster than 91%
Run 8: 4:42 5:38 faster than 83%
Wall balls: 3:30 4:05 faster than 88%
Roxzone: 5:53 7:20 faster than 87%
Runs (8 km) 35:05 42:20 faster than 81%
Stations (8) 25:08
Finish 1:06:01 1:18:49 28th of 231 · faster than 88%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Women, 40-44 1:19:16 39th of 128; 6th of 18 aged 40-44 39:27 33:58 5:55 Runs 39:27 · Stations 33:58 · Roxzone 5:55

39th of 128 Pro Women (faster than 70%).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Rotterdam 2026, Pro Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Women at this race, and the share of the 128 Pro Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 128 Pro Women here
Run 1: 4:31 4:38 faster than 58%
SkiErg: 4:52 5:01 faster than 74%
Run 2: 4:32 4:32 faster than 51%
Sled push: 3:00 3:30 faster than 81%
Run 3: 4:51 4:51 faster than 50%
Sled pull: 4:26 5:15 faster than 84%
Run 4: 4:47 4:57 faster than 59%
Burpee broad jump: 4:56 5:26 faster than 66%
Run 5: 5:02 5:02 faster than 47%
Row: 4:48 5:03 faster than 85%
Run 6: 4:49 5:00 faster than 59%
Farmers carry: 1:47 2:42 faster than 96%
Run 7: 5:12 5:03 faster than 42%
Sandbag lunges: 4:40 5:01 faster than 66%
Run 8: 5:46 5:50 faster than 55%
Wall balls: 5:29 6:23 faster than 70%
Roxzone: 5:55 6:13 faster than 59%
Runs (8 km) 39:27 40:01 faster than 55%
Stations (8) 33:58
Finish 1:19:16 1:24:57 39th of 128 · faster than 70%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Women, 40-44 1:21:01 87th of 139; 17th of 26 aged 40-44 39:14 34:06 7:45 Runs 39:14 · Stations 34:06 · Roxzone 7:45

87th of 139 Pro Women (faster than 37%).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Mechelen 2026, Pro Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Women at this race, and the share of the 139 Pro Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 139 Pro Women here
Run 1: 3:41 3:24 faster than 30%
SkiErg: 4:38 4:43 faster than 64%
Run 2: 4:36 4:20 faster than 33%
Sled push: 3:10 3:13 faster than 58%
Run 3: 5:00 4:35 faster than 26%
Sled pull: 4:29 4:47 faster than 64%
Run 4: 4:57 4:36 faster than 30%
Burpee broad jump: 5:08 4:51 faster than 43%
Run 5: 5:14 4:40 faster than 23%
Row: 4:46 4:52 faster than 70%
Run 6: 4:59 4:38 faster than 30%
Farmers carry: 1:37 2:15 faster than 99%
Run 7: 5:09 4:38 faster than 23%
Sandbag lunges: 4:37 4:39 faster than 50%
Run 8: 5:42 5:04 faster than 24%
Wall balls: 5:41 5:14 faster than 40%
Roxzone: 7:45 6:50 faster than 28%
Runs (8 km) 39:14 36:05 faster than 27%
Stations (8) 34:06
Finish 1:21:01 1:17:15 87th of 139 · faster than 37%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Doubles Women, team 45-49, with Clio Scholing 1:10:07 22nd of 91; 3rd of 9 aged 45-49 38:45 27:23 4:04 Runs 38:45 · Stations 27:23 · Roxzone 4:04

22nd of 91 Pro Doubles Women (faster than 76%).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Poznań 2025, Pro Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 91 Pro Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 91 Pro Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:31 4:59 faster than 70%
SkiErg: 4:14 4:34 faster than 91%
Run 2: 4:40 5:05 faster than 67%
Sled push: 2:06 2:24 faster than 84%
Run 3: 4:50 5:23 faster than 71%
Sled pull: 4:07 4:22 faster than 63%
Run 4: 4:49 5:23 faster than 74%
Burpee broad jump: 3:08 3:32 faster than 73%
Run 5: 4:58 5:25 faster than 71%
Row: 4:43 4:58 faster than 77%
Run 6: 4:55 5:19 faster than 68%
Farmers carry: 1:44 1:54 faster than 83%
Run 7: 5:00 5:20 faster than 70%
Sandbag lunges: 3:27 3:47 faster than 70%
Run 8: 5:07 5:37 faster than 72%
Wall balls: 3:54 3:58 faster than 61%
Roxzone: 4:04 4:55 faster than 78%
Runs (8 km) 38:45 42:09 faster than 72%
Stations (8) 27:23
Finish 1:10:07 1:16:51 22nd of 91 · faster than 76%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Women, 40-44 1:24:42 46th of 180; 6th of 21 aged 40-44 41:57 37:13 5:38 Runs 41:57 · Stations 37:13 · Roxzone 5:38

46th of 180 Pro Women (faster than 74%).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Utrecht 2025, Pro Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Women at this race, and the share of the 180 Pro Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 180 Pro Women here
Run 1: 4:39 4:55 faster than 62%
SkiErg: 4:46 4:50 faster than 62%
Run 2: 5:01 5:24 faster than 69%
Sled push: 3:57 5:06 faster than 81%
Run 3: 5:25 5:53 faster than 70%
Sled pull: 5:11 5:46 faster than 68%
Run 4: 5:29 5:53 faster than 67%
Burpee broad jump: 5:13 5:45 faster than 68%
Run 5: 5:39 6:04 faster than 67%
Row: 5:09 5:09 faster than 51%
Run 6: 5:36 5:57 faster than 64%
Farmers carry: 1:39 2:54 fastest in the field
Run 7: 5:36 5:59 faster than 65%
Sandbag lunges: 5:21 5:37 faster than 55%
Run 8: 4:35 5:03 faster than 67%
Wall balls: 5:57 7:09 faster than 68%
Roxzone: 5:38 5:46 faster than 56%
Runs (8 km) 41:57 45:18 faster than 68%
Stations (8) 37:13
Finish 1:24:42 1:35:30 46th of 180 · faster than 74%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Doubles Women, team 45-49, with Clio Scholing 1:10:07 22nd of 177; 2nd of 10 aged 45-49 37:24 26:45 6:03 Runs 37:24 · Stations 26:45 · Roxzone 6:03

22nd of 177 Pro Doubles Women (faster than 88%).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Hamburg 2025, Pro Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 177 Pro Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 177 Pro Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:02 5:50 faster than 85%
SkiErg: 4:02 4:22 faster than 96%
Run 2: 4:18 5:00 faster than 84%
Sled push: 1:52 2:35 faster than 98%
Run 3: 4:36 5:13 faster than 78%
Sled pull: 4:01 4:34 faster than 77%
Run 4: 4:29 5:15 faster than 86%
Burpee broad jump: 2:53 3:35 faster than 89%
Run 5: 4:40 5:18 faster than 80%
Row: 4:44 4:52 faster than 72%
Run 6: 4:37 5:17 faster than 82%
Farmers carry: 1:49 1:53 faster than 61%
Run 7: 4:44 5:21 faster than 80%
Sandbag lunges: 3:36 4:12 faster than 78%
Run 8: 5:02 5:43 faster than 76%
Wall balls: 3:48 4:13 faster than 78%
Roxzone: 6:03 7:17 faster than 86%
Runs (8 km) 37:24 43:16 faster than 83%
Stations (8) 26:45
Finish 1:10:07 1:20:32 22nd of 177 · faster than 88%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Maastricht Sep 2025 19 Sep 2025 · 2 results
Race results
Open Women, 40-44 1:16:02 55th of 939; 6th of 74 aged 40-44 40:47 29:02 6:19 Runs 40:47 · Stations 29:02 · Roxzone 6:19

55th of 939 Open Women (faster than 94%).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Maastricht Sep 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 939 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 939 Open Women here
Run 1: 4:58 5:30 faster than 75%
SkiErg: 4:35 5:07 faster than 96%
Run 2: 4:48 5:30 faster than 81%
Sled push: 1:47 2:31 faster than 97%
Run 3: 5:03 5:44 faster than 80%
Sled pull: 3:34 5:44 fastest in the field
Run 4: 4:58 5:51 faster than 85%
Burpee broad jump: 4:24 6:50 faster than 96%
Run 5: 5:12 6:06 faster than 83%
Row: 4:48 5:22 faster than 95%
Run 6: 5:03 5:55 faster than 84%
Farmers carry: 1:34 2:12 faster than 99%
Run 7: 5:06 5:52 faster than 80%
Sandbag lunges: 3:43 5:06 faster than 93%
Run 8: 5:42 6:33 faster than 77%
Wall balls: 4:37 7:03 faster than 94%
Roxzone: 6:19 8:04 faster than 88%
Runs (8 km) 40:47 47:12 faster than 82%
Stations (8) 29:02
Finish 1:16:02 1:35:47 55th of 939 · faster than 94%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Mixed, team 50-54, with Chris Herman 1:16:12 234th of 1,026; 4th of 22 aged 50-54 42:22 27:29 6:25 Runs 42:22 · Stations 27:29 · Roxzone 6:25

234th of 1,026 Doubles Mixed (faster than 77%). Against the 34 who finished around 1:16:59: most time gained on the roxzone (0:23), most lost on the eight runs (0:37). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:31 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:36 more).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Maastricht Sep 2025, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 1,026 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,026 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 4:58 5:33 faster than 74%
SkiErg: 4:03 4:15 faster than 80%
Run 2: 4:48 5:22 faster than 75%
Sled push: 1:34 1:56 faster than 94%
Run 3: 5:06 5:39 faster than 76%
Sled pull: 3:34 4:15 faster than 84%
Run 4: 5:06 5:44 faster than 78%
Burpee broad jump: 3:09 3:54 faster than 82%
Run 5: 5:45 6:00 faster than 60%
Row: 4:43 4:48 faster than 57%
Run 6: 5:19 5:53 faster than 75%
Farmers carry: 1:32 1:50 faster than 90%
Run 7: 5:32 5:53 faster than 67%
Sandbag lunges: 4:05 4:04 faster than 49%
Run 8: 5:53 6:20 faster than 67%
Wall balls: 4:49 4:57 faster than 55%
Roxzone: 6:25 7:45 faster than 82%
Runs (8 km) 42:22 46:38 faster than 72%
Stations (8) 27:29
Finish 1:16:12 1:24:54 234th of 1,026 · faster than 77%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Heerenveen May 2025 10–11 May 2025 · 2 results
Race results
Pro Doubles Women, team 40-49, with Clio Scholing 1:09:57 8th of 69; 1st of 11 aged 40-49 37:35 26:03 6:24 Runs 37:35 · Stations 26:03 · Roxzone 6:24

8th of 69 Pro Doubles Women (faster than 89%).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Heerenveen May 2025, Pro Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 69 Pro Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 69 Pro Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:25 4:43 faster than 70%
SkiErg: 4:11 4:23 faster than 82%
Run 2: 4:27 5:01 faster than 79%
Sled push: 2:00 2:11 faster than 75%
Run 3: 4:38 5:15 faster than 83%
Sled pull: 3:34 4:28 faster than 92%
Run 4: 4:42 5:13 faster than 79%
Burpee broad jump: 2:54 3:50 faster than 89%
Run 5: 4:56 5:16 faster than 70%
Row: 4:34 4:54 faster than 86%
Run 6: 4:41 5:15 faster than 88%
Farmers carry: 1:39 1:57 faster than 86%
Run 7: 4:51 5:23 faster than 73%
Sandbag lunges: 3:25 3:59 faster than 77%
Run 8: 4:57 5:41 faster than 83%
Wall balls: 3:46 4:05 faster than 72%
Roxzone: 6:24 7:50 faster than 94%
Runs (8 km) 37:35 41:44 faster than 77%
Stations (8) 26:03
Finish 1:09:57 1:20:23 8th of 69 · faster than 89%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Mechelen 2025 4 Apr 2025 · 2 results
Race results
Doubles Mixed, team 50-59, with Christiaan Herman 1:14:57 188th of 722; 8th of 25 aged 50-59 39:01 27:08 8:48† Runs 39:01 · Stations 27:08 · Roxzone 8:48

188th of 722 Doubles Mixed (faster than 74%).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Mechelen 2025, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 722 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 722 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 6:16 7:02 faster than 80%
SkiErg: 4:01 4:14 faster than 81%
Run 2: 4:17 4:42 faster than 75%
Sled push: 1:20 1:47 faster than 97%
Run 3: 4:32 5:01 faster than 74%
Sled pull: 3:24 3:49 faster than 73%
Run 4: 4:39 5:01 faster than 71%
Burpee broad jump: 3:12 3:36 faster than 71%
Run 5: 4:38 5:05 faster than 73%
Row: 4:47 4:41 faster than 39%
Run 6: 4:45 5:04 faster than 67%
Farmers carry: 1:51 1:47 faster than 41%
Run 7: 4:50 5:05 faster than 62%
Sandbag lunges: 4:01 3:59 faster than 48%
Run 8: 5:04 5:26 faster than 66%
Wall balls: 4:32 4:03 faster than 23%
Roxzone †: 8:48
Runs (8 km) 39:01 42:37 faster than 73%
Stations (8) 27:08
Finish 1:14:57 1:20:57 188th of 722 · faster than 74%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 40-44 1:17:48 82nd of 1,119; 13th of 127 aged 40-44 42:05 29:29 6:18 Runs 42:05 · Stations 29:29 · Roxzone 6:18

82nd of 1,119 Open Women (faster than 92%). Against the 33 who finished around 1:16:17: most time gained on sled pull (1:09), most lost on the eight runs (2:22). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:05 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:47 more).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Rotterdam 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,119 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,119 Open Women here
Run 1: 5:10 5:53 faster than 83%
SkiErg: 4:36 5:04 faster than 94%
Run 2: 4:53 5:37 faster than 85%
Sled push: 1:51 2:34 faster than 96%
Run 3: 5:11 5:53 faster than 82%
Sled pull: 3:25 5:38 faster than 99%
Run 4: 5:18 5:57 faster than 79%
Burpee broad jump: 4:52 6:52 faster than 88%
Run 5: 5:51 6:08 faster than 61%
Row: 4:57 5:18 faster than 82%
Run 6: 5:16 5:57 faster than 81%
Farmers carry: 1:57 2:12 faster than 78%
Run 7: 5:00 5:55 faster than 88%
Sandbag lunges: 3:56 5:02 faster than 87%
Run 8: 5:30 6:35 faster than 87%
Wall balls: 3:55 5:44 faster than 94%
Roxzone: 6:18 7:17 faster than 72%
Runs (8 km) 42:05 48:08 faster than 84%
Stations (8) 29:29
Finish 1:17:48 1:34:28 82nd of 1,119 · faster than 92%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Maastricht Feb 2025 1 Feb 2025 · 2 results
Race results
Doubles Mixed, team 50-59, with Chris Herman 1:12:25 189th of 681; 5th of 31 aged 50-59 35:14* 25:59* 5:38 Runs 35:14 · Stations 25:59 · Roxzone 5:38

189th of 681 Doubles Mixed (faster than 72%).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Maastricht Feb 2025, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 681 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 681 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 6:37 7:16 faster than 73%
SkiErg: 3:57 4:12 faster than 84%
Run 2: 4:33 5:01 faster than 75%
Sled push: 1:26 1:50 faster than 95%
Run 3: 4:39 5:13 faster than 80%
Sled pull: 3:28 3:34 faster than 56%
Run 4: 4:54 5:16 faster than 70%
Burpee broad jump: 2:58 3:27 faster than 74%
Run 5: —
Row: 4:42 4:38 faster than 43%
Run 6: 4:48 5:18 faster than 76%
Farmers carry: 1:52 1:42 faster than 30%
Run 7: 4:44 5:22 faster than 81%
Sandbag lunges: 3:37 3:40 faster than 52%
Run 8: 5:00 5:17 faster than 63%
Wall balls: 3:59 3:57 faster than 49%
Roxzone: 5:38 6:07 faster than 66%
Runs (8 km) 35:14 38:16 faster than 71%
Stations (8) 25:59
Finish 1:12:25 1:18:36 189th of 681 · faster than 72%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Amsterdam 2024 10 Oct 2024 · 3 results
Race results
Doubles Mixed, team 50-59, with Chris Herman 1:14:16 219th of 994; 5th of 29 aged 50-59 42:40 26:23 5:18 Runs 42:40 · Stations 26:23 · Roxzone 5:18

219th of 994 Doubles Mixed (faster than 78%). Against the 30 who finished around 1:13:23: most time gained on sled push (0:06), most lost on sled pull (0:28). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:47 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:27 more).

Irma van de Pol at HYROX Amsterdam 2024, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 994 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 994 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 3:36 4:16 faster than 84%
SkiErg: 3:59 4:11 faster than 78%
Run 2: 5:04 5:55 faster than 84%
Sled push: 1:31 1:44 faster than 83%
Run 3: 5:20 6:11 faster than 83%
Sled pull: 3:42 3:27 faster than 35%
Run 4: 5:28 6:15 faster than 80%
Burpee broad jump: 3:10 3:27 faster than 66%
Run 5: 5:37 6:22 faster than 77%
Row: 4:46 4:39 faster than 38%
Run 6: 5:30 6:17 faster than 80%
Farmers carry: 1:43 1:40 faster than 44%
Run 7: 5:41 6:19 faster than 74%
Sandbag lunges: 3:32 3:43 faster than 59%
Run 8: 6:27 6:41 faster than 58%
Wall balls: 4:00 4:05 faster than 57%
Roxzone: 5:18 6:04 faster than 74%
Runs (8 km) 42:40 48:32 faster than 80%
Stations (8) 26:23
Finish 1:14:16 1:22:06 219th of 994 · faster than 78%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's, and a relay place is among all relay teams at that race (relay teams are ranked together). Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. † This venue did not time the roxzone: the figure is the finish minus runs and stations, and part of the walk is inside the run laps there, so it is shorter than at other venues. A dash in runs, stations and roxzone on a result from the live results service means the splits are not in yet (finish time only). The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. A dash means the organiser did not publish that number for the result. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Pro Women

The fastest Irma has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:38 Mechelen 2026 · best of 3 4:53
Sled push 3:00 Rotterdam 2026 · best of 3 3:56
Sled pull 4:26 Rotterdam 2026 · best of 3 5:49
Burpee broad jump 4:56 Rotterdam 2026 · best of 3 5:12
Row 4:46 Mechelen 2026 · best of 3 5:07
Farmers carry 1:37 Mechelen 2026 · best of 3 2:36
Sandbag lunges 4:37 Mechelen 2026 · best of 3 5:10
Wall balls 5:29 Rotterdam 2026 · best of 3 6:18
Runs (8 km) 39:14 Mechelen 2026 · best of 3 40:26
Roxzone 5:38 Utrecht 2025 · best of 3 6:34
How to read

Each station's best across Irma's Pro Women races, from different races, against the typical Pro Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

12 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Pro Women race

Rotterdam 2026, against 128 Pro Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Irmaedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Irma sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Carry (faster than 97% of the field), weakest on Runs (faster than 56%).

See the numbers
Part Irma: faster than
Ski 75%
Push 81%
Pull 84%
BBJ 66%
Row 85%
Carry 97%
Lunges 67%
Wall balls 71%
Roxzone 60%
Runs 56%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 75%
Sled push faster than 81%
Sled pull faster than 84%
Burpee broad jump faster than 66%
Row faster than 85%
Farmers carry faster than 97%
Sandbag lunges faster than 67%
Wall balls faster than 71%
Roxzone faster than 60%
Runs (8 km) faster than 56%

How much of the field Irma beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Farmers carry (faster than 97%); weakest: Runs (8 km) (faster than 56%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:09 faster
Sled push 0:30 faster
Sled pull 0:49 faster
Burpee broad jump 0:30 faster
Row 0:15 faster
Farmers carry 0:55 faster
Sandbag lunges 0:21 faster
Wall balls 0:54 faster
Roxzone 0:18 faster
Runs (8 km) 0:34 faster

Irma's time on each part against the typical Pro Women finisher at this race.Best: Farmers carry (0:55 faster); weakest: SkiErg (0:09 faster).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Pro Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Irma against the typical Pro Women finisher

Irma1:19:16
4:314:524:323:004:514:264:474:565:024:484:491:475:124:405:465:295:55
Typical Pro Women1:24:27
4:385:014:323:304:515:154:575:265:025:035:002:425:035:015:506:236:13
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Irma: 39:30 running, 33:58 at the stations and 5:55 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (5:29).Below, Typical Pro Women: 39:52 running, 38:21 at the stations and 6:13 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (6:23).

See the numbers
Part Irma Typical Pro Women
Run 1 4:31 4:38
SkiErg 4:52 5:01
Run 2 4:32 4:32
Sled push 3:00 3:30
Run 3 4:51 4:51
Sled pull 4:26 5:15
Run 4 4:47 4:57
Burpee broad jump 4:56 5:26
Run 5 5:02 5:02
Row 4:48 5:03
Run 6 4:49 5:00
Farmers carry 1:47 2:42
Run 7 5:12 5:03
Sandbag lunges 4:40 5:01
Run 8 5:46 5:50
Wall balls 5:29 6:23
Roxzone 5:55 6:13
Finish 1:19:16 1:24:57

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Training for the next one? Let's beat 1:19:16.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report