Athlete · Open Women · 25-29 · GBR GBR

Emily Syms

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/emily-syms-929630e3

11 HYROX races over 2 seasons: 3 solo, 8 in a team with 5 partners.

Best Open Women time1:28:44Paris 2025
Best Open Women place340thof 862 · Paris 2025
Latest race1:09:13London Olympia 2026 · Doubles Women with Francesca OrsiEmily's best Doubles Women time so far
Strongest part of the raceRoxzonefaster than 91% of Open Women at Paris 2025
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Finish time, race by race: one race type at a time

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:30:001:32:001:34:001:36:001:38:00 best 1:28:44 best 1:28:44 · Paris

This line shows the finish time of Emily Syms at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:28:44 at Paris (Apr 2025); Emily Syms was 9:51 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
London Dec 2024 Open Women 1:38:35
Glasgow Mar 2025 Open Women 1:31:25
Paris Apr 2025 Open Women 1:28:44

Each dot is one Open Women race; click one for that race's report. From the first Open Women race to the best: 9:51 faster (1:38:35 to 1:28:44).

Every race

11 results at 11 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Francesca Orsi 1:09:13 107th of 2,211; 45th of 470 aged 25-29 38:59 25:40 4:38 Runs 38:59 · Stations 25:40 · Roxzone 4:38

107th of 2,211 Doubles Women (faster than 95%). Against the 63 who finished around 1:09:18: most time gained on sandbag lunges (0:18), most lost on the eight runs (0:26). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:42 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:07 more).

Emily Syms at HYROX London Olympia 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,211 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,211 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:15 5:44 faster than 98%
SkiErg: 4:19 4:40 faster than 92%
Run 2: 4:40 5:27 faster than 87%
Sled push: 1:41 1:51 faster than 75%
Run 3: 4:58 5:40 faster than 83%
Sled pull: 3:19 3:51 faster than 82%
Run 4: 4:46 5:42 faster than 89%
Burpee broad jump: 3:06 4:21 faster than 93%
Run 5: 4:45 5:50 faster than 92%
Row: 4:59 5:08 faster than 68%
Run 6: 4:37 5:47 faster than 94%
Farmers carry: 1:42 1:55 faster than 81%
Run 7: 4:45 5:46 faster than 92%
Sandbag lunges: 2:47 3:49 faster than 95%
Run 8: 6:15 7:52 faster than 93%
Wall balls: 3:47 4:37 faster than 92%
Roxzone: 4:38 6:17 faster than 95%
Runs (8 km) 38:59 48:15 faster than 93%
Stations (8) 25:40
Finish 1:09:13 1:25:16 107th of 2,211 · faster than 95%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Amber Jefferson 1:18:23 390th of 1,546; 115th of 325 aged 25-29 44:21 29:42 4:25 Runs 44:21 · Stations 29:42 · Roxzone 4:25

390th of 1,546 Doubles Women (faster than 74%). Against the 47 who finished around 1:18:15: most time gained on the roxzone (0:34), most lost on wall balls (0:46). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:07 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:36 more).

Emily Syms at HYROX Manchester 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,546 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,546 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 3:40 4:32 faster than 88%
SkiErg: 4:41 4:37 faster than 42%
Run 2: 5:39 6:17 faster than 74%
Sled push: 1:44 1:44 faster than 51%
Run 3: 5:54 6:33 faster than 73%
Sled pull: 4:14 4:03 faster than 39%
Run 4: 5:56 6:38 faster than 73%
Burpee broad jump: 3:50 4:28 faster than 72%
Run 5: 6:09 6:44 faster than 70%
Row: 5:07 5:07 faster than 51%
Run 6: 5:56 6:42 faster than 77%
Farmers carry: 1:56 1:54 faster than 45%
Run 7: 6:11 6:43 faster than 68%
Sandbag lunges: 3:16 3:49 faster than 80%
Run 8: 5:00 5:31 faster than 70%
Wall balls: 4:54 4:21 faster than 26%
Roxzone: 4:25 6:04 faster than 87%
Runs (8 km) 44:21 50:04 faster than 76%
Stations (8) 29:42
Finish 1:18:23 1:26:49 390th of 1,546 · faster than 74%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Maya Wiseman 1:12:57 441st of 3,491; 149th of 794 aged 25-29 35:02* 26:59* 11:00 Runs 35:02 · Stations 26:59 · Roxzone 11:00

441st of 3,491 Doubles Women (faster than 87%). Against the 107 who finished around 1:13:50: most time gained on sled pull (0:29), most lost on the eight runs (0:31). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:59 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:43 more).

Emily Syms at HYROX London ExCeL 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 3,491 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,491 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 2:47 4:02 fastest in the field
SkiErg: 4:44 5:07 faster than 89%
Run 2: 4:14 4:37 faster than 74%
Sled push: 1:31 1:51 faster than 93%
Run 3: 4:22 4:45 faster than 73%
Sled pull: 3:17 4:13 faster than 95%
Run 4: 4:10 4:51 faster than 86%
Burpee broad jump: 3:31 4:23 faster than 81%
Run 5: 4:18 4:54 faster than 82%
Row: 5:06 5:19 faster than 72%
Run 6: 4:32 4:53 faster than 70%
Farmers carry: 1:40 1:49 faster than 73%
Run 7: 4:35 4:54 faster than 68%
Sandbag lunges: 3:02 3:41 faster than 86%
Run 8: 6:08 6:42 faster than 72%
Wall balls: 4:08 4:27 faster than 69%
Roxzone: 11:00 13:21 faster than 89%
Runs (8 km) 35:02 39:40 faster than 81%
Stations (8) 26:59
Finish 1:12:57 1:24:12 441st of 3,491 · faster than 87%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Lauren Siakpere 1:26:57 840th of 1,644; 245th of 467 aged 25-29 51:30 29:13 6:19 Runs 51:30 · Stations 29:13 · Roxzone 6:19

840th of 1,644 Doubles Women (faster than 48%). Against the 49 who finished around 1:26:45: most time gained on the roxzone (1:00), most lost on the eight runs (2:51). Runs 5 to 8 took 4:57 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:49 more).

Emily Syms at HYROX Madrid 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,644 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,644 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:39 5:35 faster than 91%
SkiErg: 4:56 5:04 faster than 68%
Run 2: 6:02 5:44 faster than 34%
Sled push: 1:59 1:55 faster than 41%
Run 3: 6:14 5:56 faster than 35%
Sled pull: 3:41 4:03 faster than 71%
Run 4: 6:24 5:58 faster than 30%
Burpee broad jump: 3:29 4:13 faster than 82%
Run 5: 6:30 6:05 faster than 32%
Row: 5:32 5:11 faster than 20%
Run 6: 6:21 6:03 faster than 35%
Farmers carry: 2:14 2:00 faster than 21%
Run 7: 7:09 5:59 faster than 12%
Sandbag lunges: 2:57 3:34 faster than 85%
Run 8: 8:16 6:53 faster than 14%
Wall balls: 4:25 4:22 faster than 48%
Roxzone: 6:19 7:37 faster than 81%
Runs (8 km) 51:30 48:26 faster than 31%
Stations (8) 29:13
Finish 1:26:57 1:26:45 840th of 1,644 · faster than 48%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team U29, with Maya Wiseman 1:10:31 241st of 1,701; 121st of 746 aged U29 37:07 26:12 7:14 Runs 37:07 · Stations 26:12 · Roxzone 7:14

241st of 1,701 Doubles Women (faster than 85%). Against the 52 who finished around 1:10:46: most time gained on the roxzone (0:39), most lost on wall balls (0:27). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:26 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:24 more).

Emily Syms at HYROX Berlin 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,701 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,701 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 3:25 4:20 faster than 96%
SkiErg: 4:33 4:36 faster than 59%
Run 2: 4:29 5:01 faster than 82%
Sled push: 1:37 1:46 faster than 77%
Run 3: 4:45 5:09 faster than 76%
Sled pull: 3:06 3:41 faster than 87%
Run 4: 4:43 5:12 faster than 78%
Burpee broad jump: 3:34 3:57 faster than 66%
Run 5: 4:42 5:18 faster than 82%
Row: 4:52 4:56 faster than 58%
Run 6: 4:41 5:15 faster than 81%
Farmers carry: 1:28 1:45 faster than 89%
Run 7: 4:39 5:14 faster than 83%
Sandbag lunges: 2:59 3:32 faster than 83%
Run 8: 5:46 6:38 faster than 84%
Wall balls: 4:03 4:01 faster than 48%
Roxzone: 7:14 9:15 faster than 96%
Runs (8 km) 37:07 42:06 faster than 84%
Stations (8) 26:12
Finish 1:10:31 1:19:51 241st of 1,701 · faster than 85%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team U29, with Maya Wiseman 1:10:18 74th of 1,118; 27th of 361 aged U29 39:27 26:53 4:03 Runs 39:27 · Stations 26:53 · Roxzone 4:03

74th of 1,118 Doubles Women (faster than 93%). Against the 34 who finished around 1:09:11: most time gained on the roxzone (0:26), most lost on burpee broad jump (0:24). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:24 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:56 more).

Emily Syms at HYROX London 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,118 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,118 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:17 5:43 faster than 98%
SkiErg: 4:42 4:35 faster than 37%
Run 2: 4:38 5:29 faster than 91%
Sled push: 1:28 1:48 faster than 93%
Run 3: 4:55 5:40 faster than 87%
Sled pull: 3:19 3:54 faster than 84%
Run 4: 4:43 5:42 faster than 93%
Burpee broad jump: 3:44 4:13 faster than 69%
Run 5: 4:50 5:47 faster than 92%
Row: 5:02 5:05 faster than 55%
Run 6: 4:46 5:46 faster than 93%
Farmers carry: 1:33 1:49 faster than 88%
Run 7: 4:50 5:48 faster than 92%
Sandbag lunges: 3:01 3:42 faster than 86%
Run 8: 6:31 7:51 faster than 91%
Wall balls: 4:04 4:20 faster than 68%
Roxzone: 4:03 5:56 faster than 99%
Runs (8 km) 39:27 47:57 faster than 93%
Stations (8) 26:53
Finish 1:10:18 1:23:57 74th of 1,118 · faster than 93%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Paris 2025 18 Apr 2025
Race results
Open Women, 25-29 1:28:44 340th of 862; 104th of 240 aged 25-29 39:20 43:20 6:09 Runs 39:20 · Stations 43:20 · Roxzone 6:09

340th of 862 Open Women (faster than 60%).

Emily Syms at HYROX Paris 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 862 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 862 Open Women here
Run 1: 4:46 5:26 faster than 85%
SkiErg: 5:16 5:16 faster than 50%
Run 2: 4:41 5:11 faster than 78%
Sled push: 2:48 2:42 faster than 43%
Run 3: 4:59 5:24 faster than 75%
Sled pull: 6:06 5:32 faster than 31%
Run 4: 4:56 5:25 faster than 78%
Burpee broad jump: 8:53 7:10 faster than 23%
Run 5: 5:08 5:33 faster than 73%
Row: 5:45 5:25 faster than 24%
Run 6: 5:01 5:32 faster than 76%
Farmers carry: 2:28 2:18 faster than 37%
Run 7: 5:02 5:34 faster than 77%
Sandbag lunges: 5:34 5:16 faster than 41%
Run 8: 4:52 5:13 faster than 66%
Wall balls: 6:30 6:25 faster than 48%
Roxzone: 6:09 7:50 faster than 91%
Runs (8 km) 39:20 43:29 faster than 78%
Stations (8) 43:20
Finish 1:28:44 1:32:15 340th of 862 · faster than 60%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team U29, with Maya Wiseman 1:11:03 36th of 456; 19th of 157 aged U29 39:25 27:33 4:10 Runs 39:25 · Stations 27:33 · Roxzone 4:10

36th of 456 Doubles Women (faster than 92%).

Emily Syms at HYROX Warsaw 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 456 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 456 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 3:17 4:37 fastest in the field
SkiErg: 4:36 4:44 faster than 65%
Run 2: 4:55 6:03 faster than 95%
Sled push: 1:48 1:40 faster than 34%
Run 3: 5:25 6:21 faster than 89%
Sled pull: 3:10 3:54 faster than 89%
Run 4: 5:14 6:24 faster than 94%
Burpee broad jump: 4:03 4:20 faster than 60%
Run 5: 5:21 6:32 faster than 93%
Row: 5:05 5:06 faster than 51%
Run 6: 5:21 6:28 faster than 93%
Farmers carry: 1:30 1:46 faster than 89%
Run 7: 5:29 6:31 faster than 90%
Sandbag lunges: 2:50 3:25 faster than 86%
Run 8: 4:26 5:32 faster than 93%
Wall balls: 4:31 4:10 faster than 32%
Roxzone: 4:10 6:00 faster than 97%
Runs (8 km) 39:25 48:48 faster than 94%
Stations (8) 27:33
Finish 1:11:03 1:24:34 36th of 456 · faster than 92%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 25-29 1:31:25 742nd of 1,479; 170th of 306 aged 25-29 42:58 43:57 4:34 Runs 42:58 · Stations 43:57 · Roxzone 4:34

742nd of 1,479 Open Women (faster than 49%). Against the 46 who finished around 1:31:22: most time gained on the eight runs (3:11), most lost on burpee broad jump (1:20). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:44 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:51 more).

Emily Syms at HYROX Glasgow 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,479 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,479 Open Women here
Run 1: 3:28 4:09 faster than 90%
SkiErg: 5:15 5:05 faster than 31%
Run 2: 5:28 5:50 faster than 67%
Sled push: 3:14 2:43 faster than 22%
Run 3: 5:57 6:06 faster than 56%
Sled pull: 6:22 5:12 faster than 19%
Run 4: 5:46 6:07 faster than 65%
Burpee broad jump: 8:02 6:33 faster than 27%
Run 5: 5:59 6:21 faster than 65%
Row: 5:43 5:23 faster than 23%
Run 6: 5:50 6:14 faster than 66%
Farmers carry: 2:29 2:11 faster than 29%
Run 7: 5:43 6:14 faster than 71%
Sandbag lunges: 5:25 4:58 faster than 36%
Run 8: 4:52 5:12 faster than 63%
Wall balls: 7:27 6:10 faster than 28%
Roxzone: 4:34 5:37 faster than 80%
Runs (8 km) 42:58 46:43 faster than 71%
Stations (8) 43:57
Finish 1:31:25 1:31:22 742nd of 1,479 · faster than 49%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 25-29 1:38:35 948th of 1,531; 189th of 287 aged 25-29 45:13 45:35 7:50 Runs 45:13 · Stations 45:35 · Roxzone 7:50

948th of 1,531 Open Women (faster than 38%). Against the 46 who finished around 1:37:30: most time gained on the eight runs (1:17), most lost on burpee broad jump (1:58). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:13 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:21 more).

Emily Syms at HYROX London 2024, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,531 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,531 Open Women here
Run 1: 6:10 6:40 faster than 72%
SkiErg: 5:18 5:08 faster than 33%
Run 2: 5:03 5:01 faster than 47%
Sled push: 3:05 3:01 faster than 46%
Run 3: 5:24 5:14 faster than 41%
Sled pull: 6:27 6:03 faster than 40%
Run 4: 5:24 5:18 faster than 45%
Burpee broad jump: 9:03 6:48 faster than 20%
Run 5: 5:42 5:28 faster than 39%
Row: 5:55 5:24 faster than 16%
Run 6: 5:39 5:22 faster than 38%
Farmers carry: 3:02 2:10 faster than 8%
Run 7: 5:26 5:20 faster than 46%
Sandbag lunges: 5:37 4:57 faster than 31%
Run 8: 6:27 6:01 faster than 37%
Wall balls: 7:08 6:40 faster than 40%
Roxzone: 7:50 8:09 faster than 56%
Runs (8 km) 45:13 44:38 faster than 46%
Stations (8) 45:35
Finish 1:38:35 1:33:52 948th of 1,531 · faster than 38%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Milan 2024 19 Oct 2024
Race results
Doubles Women, team U29, with Sophie Smith 1:22:47 174th of 584; 67th of 199 aged U29 43:44 31:10 7:57 Runs 43:44 · Stations 31:10 · Roxzone 7:57

174th of 584 Doubles Women (faster than 70%).

Emily Syms at HYROX Milan 2024, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 584 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 584 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:48 6:59 faster than 94%
SkiErg: 4:53 4:51 faster than 47%
Run 2: 5:21 5:48 faster than 74%
Sled push: 1:38 1:52 faster than 83%
Run 3: 5:41 6:00 faster than 68%
Sled pull: 4:51 4:33 faster than 36%
Run 4: 5:43 6:03 faster than 67%
Burpee broad jump: 4:22 4:33 faster than 58%
Run 5: 5:31 6:05 faster than 79%
Row: 5:21 5:14 faster than 39%
Run 6: 5:32 6:02 faster than 76%
Farmers carry: 1:54 1:53 faster than 47%
Run 7: 5:33 6:02 faster than 73%
Sandbag lunges: 3:49 3:56 faster than 57%
Run 8: 4:38 5:01 faster than 69%
Wall balls: 4:22 4:05 faster than 30%
Roxzone: 7:57 8:11 faster than 57%
Runs (8 km) 43:44 48:24 faster than 80%
Stations (8) 31:10
Finish 1:22:47 1:28:05 174th of 584 · faster than 70%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Open Women

The fastest Emily has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 5:15 Glasgow 2025 · best of 3 5:16
Sled push 2:48 Paris 2025 · best of 3 2:55
Sled pull 6:06 Paris 2025 · best of 3 5:47
Burpee broad jump 8:02 Glasgow 2025 · best of 3 6:46
Row 5:43 Glasgow 2025 · best of 3 5:31
Farmers carry 2:28 Paris 2025 · best of 3 2:19
Sandbag lunges 5:25 Glasgow 2025 · best of 3 5:13
Wall balls 6:30 Paris 2025 · best of 3 6:43
Runs (8 km) 39:20 Paris 2025 · best of 3 46:44
Roxzone 4:34 Glasgow 2025 · best of 3 7:57
How to read

Each station's best across Emily's Open Women races, from different races, against the typical Open Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

5 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Women race

Paris 2025, against 862 Open Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Emilyedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Emily sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Roxzone (faster than 91% of the field), weakest on BBJ (faster than 24%).

See the numbers
Part Emily: faster than
Ski 50%
Push 43%
Pull 31%
BBJ 24%
Row 25%
Carry 38%
Lunges 41%
Wall balls 49%
Roxzone 91%
Runs 79%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 50%
Sled push faster than 43%
Sled pull faster than 31%
Burpee broad jump faster than 24%
Row faster than 25%
Farmers carry faster than 38%
Sandbag lunges faster than 41%
Wall balls faster than 49%
Roxzone faster than 91%
Runs (8 km) faster than 79%

How much of the field Emily beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Roxzone (faster than 91%); weakest: Burpee broad jump (faster than 24%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg level
Sled push 0:06 slower
Sled pull 0:34 slower
Burpee broad jump 1:43 slower
Row 0:20 slower
Farmers carry 0:10 slower
Sandbag lunges 0:18 slower
Wall balls 0:05 slower
Roxzone 1:41 faster
Runs (8 km) 4:09 faster

Emily's time on each part against the typical Open Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (4:09 faster); weakest: Burpee broad jump (1:43 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Emily against the typical Open Women finisher

Emily1:28:44
4:465:164:412:484:596:064:568:535:085:455:012:285:025:344:526:306:09
Typical Open Women1:31:12
5:265:165:112:425:245:325:257:105:335:255:322:185:345:165:136:257:50
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Emily: 39:25 running, 43:20 at the stations and 6:09 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (8:53).Below, Typical Open Women: 43:18 running, 40:04 at the stations and 7:50 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (7:10).

See the numbers
Part Emily Typical Open Women
Run 1 4:46 5:26
SkiErg 5:16 5:16
Run 2 4:41 5:11
Sled push 2:48 2:42
Run 3 4:59 5:24
Sled pull 6:06 5:32
Run 4 4:56 5:25
Burpee broad jump 8:53 7:10
Run 5 5:08 5:33
Row 5:45 5:25
Run 6 5:01 5:32
Farmers carry 2:28 2:18
Run 7 5:02 5:34
Sandbag lunges 5:34 5:16
Run 8 4:52 5:13
Wall balls 6:30 6:25
Roxzone 6:09 7:50
Finish 1:28:44 1:32:15

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Burpee broad jump cost 1:43 against the typical Open Women finisher at Paris 2025. The burpee broad jump guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix burpee broad jump. Then beat 1:28:44.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report