Athlete · Open Men · 55-59 · GBR GBR

John das Gupta

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/john-das-gupta-3706af0c

7 HYROX races over 3 seasons: 3 solo, 4 in a team with 3 partners. 2 age-group wins.

Best Open Men time1:05:26Málaga 2026
Best Open Men place176thof 2,820 · Rome 2026
Latest race1:06:07Birmingham Oct Birm · Open Men0:41 slower than John's best Open Men time (1:05:26)
Strongest part of the raceFarmers carryfaster than 98% of Open Men at Málaga 2026
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Finish time, race by race: one race type at a time

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:06:001:07:001:08:00 best 1:05:26 best 1:05:26 · Málaga

This line shows the finish time of John das Gupta at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:05:26 at Málaga (Apr 2026); John das Gupta was 0:41 slower at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Málaga Apr 2026 Open Men 1:05:26
Rome Sep 2026 Open Men 1:06:54
Birmingham Oct 2026 Open Men 1:06:07

Each dot is one Open Men race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Open Men races yet to measure the change.

Every race

7 results at 6 races

Tap a result for its full report
Birmingham Oct Birm 27–31 Oct 2026 · 2 results
Race results
Open Men, 55-59 1:06:07 289th of 3,831; 2nd of 144 aged 55-59 32:32 28:49 4:50 Runs 32:32 · Stations 28:49 · Roxzone 4:50

289th of 3,831 Open Men (faster than 92%). Against the 118 who finished around 1:07:33: most time gained on burpee broad jump (0:27), most lost on sled push (0:12). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:25 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:05 more).

John das Gupta at HYROX Birmingham Oct Birm, Open Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Men at this race, and the share of the 3,831 Open Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,831 Open Men here
Run 1: 4:31 5:09 faster than 81%
SkiErg: 4:29 4:33 faster than 59%
Run 2: 3:58 4:31 faster than 81%
Sled push: 3:05 3:20 faster than 66%
Run 3: 3:59 4:51 faster than 91%
Sled pull: 3:52 4:36 faster than 78%
Run 4: 4:02 4:51 faster than 88%
Burpee broad jump: 3:27 5:33 faster than 93%
Run 5: 4:02 4:59 faster than 91%
Row: 4:21 4:48 faster than 92%
Run 6: 3:57 4:52 faster than 91%
Farmers carry: 1:30 2:08 faster than 96%
Run 7: 4:06 4:52 faster than 87%
Sandbag lunges: 3:30 5:08 faster than 94%
Run 8: 4:00 5:11 faster than 94%
Wall balls: 4:35 7:05 faster than 92%
Roxzone: 4:50 6:25 faster than 89%
Runs (8 km) 32:32 39:20 faster than 89%
Stations (8) 28:49
Finish 1:06:07 1:24:06 289th of 3,831 · faster than 92%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Mixed, team 50-54, with Emma Glanville 1:08:00 486th of 3,498; 10th of 140 aged 50-54 35:52 27:25 4:49 Runs 35:52 · Stations 27:25 · Roxzone 4:49

486th of 3,498 Doubles Mixed (faster than 86%). Against the 96 who finished around 1:07:57: most time gained on the eight runs (0:50), most lost on sandbag lunges (0:33). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:47 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:00 more).

John das Gupta at HYROX Birmingham Oct Birm, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 3,498 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,498 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 5:04 5:51 faster than 79%
SkiErg: 4:14 4:18 faster than 62%
Run 2: 4:20 5:08 faster than 82%
Sled push: 2:08 2:26 faster than 79%
Run 3: 4:31 5:23 faster than 84%
Sled pull: 3:35 3:56 faster than 68%
Run 4: 4:26 5:24 faster than 86%
Burpee broad jump: 3:07 3:47 faster than 77%
Run 5: 4:25 5:29 faster than 88%
Row: 4:34 4:45 faster than 69%
Run 6: 4:23 5:25 faster than 88%
Farmers carry: 1:37 1:47 faster than 75%
Run 7: 4:23 5:27 faster than 89%
Sandbag lunges: 3:48 4:03 faster than 61%
Run 8: 4:23 5:30 faster than 89%
Wall balls: 4:22 4:45 faster than 65%
Roxzone: 4:49 6:34 faster than 91%
Runs (8 km) 35:52 43:45 faster than 86%
Stations (8) 27:25
Finish 1:08:00 1:22:06 486th of 3,498 · faster than 86%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Rome 2026 23 Sep 2026
Race results
Open Men, 55-59 1:06:54 176th of 2,820; 1st of 43 aged 55-59 30:59 31:06 4:54 Runs 30:59 · Stations 31:06 · Roxzone 4:54

176th of 2,820 Open Men (faster than 93%). Against the 85 who finished around 1:05:54: most time gained on the eight runs (0:43), most lost on wall balls (1:09). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:36 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:18 less).

John das Gupta at HYROX Rome 2026, Open Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Men at this race, and the share of the 2,820 Open Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,820 Open Men here
Run 1: 5:02 5:48 faster than 87%
SkiErg: 4:25 4:31 faster than 64%
Run 2: 3:31 4:17 faster than 94%
Sled push: 2:52 3:24 faster than 79%
Run 3: 3:40 4:37 faster than 95%
Sled pull: 3:42 4:45 faster than 88%
Run 4: 3:37 4:36 faster than 96%
Burpee broad jump: 3:58 5:30 faster than 87%
Run 5: 3:43 4:46 faster than 95%
Row: 4:32 4:58 faster than 90%
Run 6: 3:37 4:40 faster than 96%
Farmers carry: 2:03 2:11 faster than 60%
Run 7: 3:37 4:41 faster than 97%
Sandbag lunges: 3:40 5:20 faster than 94%
Run 8: 4:17 5:37 faster than 95%
Wall balls: 5:54 6:51 faster than 68%
Roxzone: 4:54 6:55 faster than 96%
Runs (8 km) 30:59 39:17 faster than 96%
Stations (8) 31:06
Finish 1:06:54 1:24:37 176th of 2,820 · faster than 93%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Men, 55-59 1:05:26 161st of 2,072; 1st of 55 aged 55-59 34:03 26:32 4:57 Runs 34:03 · Stations 26:32 · Roxzone 4:57

161st of 2,072 Open Men (faster than 92%). Against the 63 who finished around 1:06:51: most time gained on wall balls (1:00), most lost on the eight runs (1:37). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:10 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:52 more).

John das Gupta at HYROX Málaga 2026, Open Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Men at this race, and the share of the 2,072 Open Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,072 Open Men here
Run 1: 4:10 4:15 faster than 55%
SkiErg: 4:15 4:26 faster than 78%
Run 2: 4:15 4:32 faster than 66%
Sled push: 2:38 2:54 faster than 70%
Run 3: 4:17 4:47 faster than 78%
Sled pull: 3:21 4:37 faster than 94%
Run 4: 4:16 4:52 faster than 81%
Burpee broad jump: 3:13 5:10 faster than 96%
Run 5: 4:21 4:58 faster than 81%
Row: 4:29 4:55 faster than 91%
Run 6: 4:14 4:51 faster than 82%
Farmers carry: 1:23 2:03 faster than 97%
Run 7: 4:18 4:51 faster than 80%
Sandbag lunges: 3:17 4:59 faster than 96%
Run 8: 4:15 4:58 faster than 84%
Wall balls: 3:56 6:05 faster than 97%
Roxzone: 4:57 6:12 faster than 81%
Runs (8 km) 34:03 38:13 faster than 79%
Stations (8) 26:32
Finish 1:05:26 1:20:07 161st of 2,072 · faster than 92%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Men, team 35-39, with Elliot Das Gupta 1:00:32 391st of 3,927; 79th of 842 aged 35-39 26:56* 24:47* 8:54 Runs 26:56 · Stations 24:47 · Roxzone 8:54

391st of 3,927 Doubles Men (faster than 90%). Against the 124 who finished around 1:00:34: most time gained on the eight runs (0:56), most lost on SkiErg (0:18). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:38 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:18 more).

John das Gupta at HYROX London ExCeL 2025, Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 3,927 Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,927 Doubles Men here
Run 1: 2:56 3:18 faster than 77%
SkiErg: 4:23 4:19 faster than 42%
Run 2: 3:13 3:48 faster than 88%
Sled push: 1:42 1:45 faster than 58%
Run 3: 3:16 4:00 faster than 93%
Sled pull: 3:03 3:17 faster than 67%
Run 4: 3:16 4:03 faster than 94%
Burpee broad jump: 2:40 3:12 faster than 79%
Run 5: 3:19 4:08 faster than 94%
Row: 4:20 4:33 faster than 76%
Run 6: 3:18 4:06 faster than 94%
Farmers carry: 1:24 1:34 faster than 80%
Run 7: 3:19 4:07 faster than 94%
Sandbag lunges: 3:09 3:32 faster than 72%
Run 8: 4:22 5:39 faster than 97%
Wall balls: 4:06 4:34 faster than 75%
Roxzone: 8:54 11:04 faster than 92%
Runs (8 km) 26:56 33:15 faster than 94%
Stations (8) 24:47
Finish 1:00:32 1:11:24 391st of 3,927 · faster than 90%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Men, team 60-64, with Mark Kendall 1:12:22 1312th of 2,466; 3rd of 11 aged 60-64 39:09 27:54 5:24 Runs 39:09 · Stations 27:54 · Roxzone 5:24

1,312th of 2,466 Doubles Men (faster than 46%). Against the 74 who finished around 1:12:56: most time gained on the eight runs (0:42), most lost on sled push (0:44). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:19 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:03 more).

John das Gupta at HYROX Birmingham 2025, Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 2,466 Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,466 Doubles Men here
Run 1: 5:09 5:20 faster than 59%
SkiErg: 4:07 3:59 faster than 31%
Run 2: 4:34 4:32 faster than 47%
Sled push: 2:37 1:52 faster than 6%
Run 3: 4:48 4:51 faster than 52%
Sled pull: 3:31 3:13 faster than 32%
Run 4: 4:56 4:53 faster than 48%
Burpee broad jump: 3:37 3:07 faster than 27%
Run 5: 4:55 5:01 faster than 54%
Row: 4:21 4:25 faster than 59%
Run 6: 4:55 4:54 faster than 49%
Farmers carry: 1:35 1:37 faster than 54%
Run 7: 4:57 4:54 faster than 48%
Sandbag lunges: 3:46 3:24 faster than 32%
Run 8: 4:59 4:54 faster than 45%
Wall balls: 4:20 4:25 faster than 54%
Roxzone: 5:24 5:50 faster than 65%
Runs (8 km) 39:09 39:20 faster than 51%
Stations (8) 27:54
Finish 1:12:22 1:11:29 1312th of 2,466 · faster than 46%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Men, team 30-39, with Elliot Das Gupta 1:05:40 272nd of 833; 136th of 381 aged 30-39 37:15 24:30 3:55† Runs 37:15 · Stations 24:30 · Roxzone 3:55

272nd of 833 Doubles Men (faster than 67%).

John das Gupta at HYROX Cardiff 2025, Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 833 Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 833 Doubles Men here
Run 1: 5:06 4:55 faster than 39%
SkiErg: 4:13 4:03 faster than 26%
Run 2: 4:32 4:32 faster than 50%
Sled push: 1:26 1:38 faster than 81%
Run 3: 4:29 4:46 faster than 67%
Sled pull: 2:47 3:01 faster than 67%
Run 4: 4:33 4:49 faster than 66%
Burpee broad jump: 3:08 3:20 faster than 63%
Run 5: 4:37 4:57 faster than 66%
Row: 4:07 4:26 faster than 88%
Run 6: 4:29 4:52 faster than 73%
Farmers carry: 1:27 1:34 faster than 72%
Run 7: 4:31 4:54 faster than 71%
Sandbag lunges: 3:17 3:13 faster than 47%
Run 8: 4:58 5:36 faster than 79%
Wall balls: 4:05 4:08 faster than 53%
Roxzone †: 3:55
Runs (8 km) 37:15 39:37 faster than 66%
Stations (8) 24:30
Finish 1:05:40 1:09:31 272nd of 833 · faster than 67%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. † This venue did not time the roxzone: the figure is the finish minus runs and stations, and part of the walk is inside the run laps there, so it is shorter than at other venues. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Open Men

The fastest John has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:15 Málaga 2026 · best of 3 4:34
Sled push 2:38 Málaga 2026 · best of 3 3:04
Sled pull 3:21 Málaga 2026 · best of 3 4:57
Burpee broad jump 3:13 Málaga 2026 · best of 3 5:38
Row 4:21 Birmingham Oct Birm · best of 3 4:53
Farmers carry 1:23 Málaga 2026 · best of 3 2:11
Sandbag lunges 3:17 Málaga 2026 · best of 3 5:20
Wall balls 3:56 Málaga 2026 · best of 3 7:03
Runs (8 km) 30:59 Rome 2026 · best of 3 41:47
Roxzone 4:50 Birmingham Oct Birm · best of 3 7:23
How to read

Each station's best across John's Open Men races, from different races, against the typical Open Men split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

3 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Men race

Málaga 2026, against 2,072 Open Men

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Johnedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where John sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Carry (faster than 98% of the field), weakest on Push (faster than 70%).

See the numbers
Part John: faster than
Ski 78%
Push 70%
Pull 95%
BBJ 97%
Row 91%
Carry 98%
Lunges 97%
Wall balls 97%
Roxzone 82%
Runs 79%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 78%
Sled push faster than 70%
Sled pull faster than 95%
Burpee broad jump faster than 97%
Row faster than 91%
Farmers carry faster than 98%
Sandbag lunges faster than 97%
Wall balls faster than 97%
Roxzone faster than 82%
Runs (8 km) faster than 79%

How much of the field John beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Farmers carry (faster than 98%); weakest: Sled push (faster than 70%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:11 faster
Sled push 0:16 faster
Sled pull 1:16 faster
Burpee broad jump 1:57 faster
Row 0:26 faster
Farmers carry 0:40 faster
Sandbag lunges 1:42 faster
Wall balls 2:09 faster
Roxzone 1:15 faster
Runs (8 km) 4:10 faster

John's time on each part against the typical Open Men finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (4:10 faster); weakest: SkiErg (0:11 faster).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Men finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: John against the typical Open Men finisher

John1:05:26
4:104:154:152:384:173:214:163:134:214:294:141:234:183:174:153:564:57
Typical Open Men1:19:25
4:154:264:322:544:474:374:525:104:584:554:512:034:514:594:586:056:12
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.John: 34:06 running, 26:31 at the stations and 4:57 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (4:29).Below, Typical Open Men: 38:04 running, 35:09 at the stations and 6:12 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (6:05).

See the numbers
Part John Typical Open Men
Run 1 4:10 4:15
SkiErg 4:15 4:26
Run 2 4:15 4:32
Sled push 2:38 2:54
Run 3 4:17 4:47
Sled pull 3:21 4:37
Run 4 4:16 4:52
Burpee broad jump 3:13 5:10
Run 5 4:21 4:58
Row 4:29 4:55
Run 6 4:14 4:51
Farmers carry 1:23 2:03
Run 7 4:18 4:51
Sandbag lunges 3:17 4:59
Run 8 4:15 4:58
Wall balls 3:56 6:05
Roxzone 4:57 6:12
Finish 1:05:26 1:20:07

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Training for the next one? Let's beat 1:05:26.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report