Athlete · Open Women · 35-39 · GBR GBR

Emma Pemberton

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/emma-pemberton-29b671cc

7 HYROX races over 3 seasons: 5 solo, 2 in a team with 2 partners.

Best Open Women time1:30:48Glasgow 2025
Best Open Women place552ndof 1,296 · Barcelona 2026
Latest race1:36:04Birmingham Birm · Open Women5:16 slower than Emma's best Open Women time (1:30:48)
Strongest part of the raceSandbag lungesfaster than 88% of Open Women at Glasgow 2025
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Open Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:32:001:34:001:36:001:38:001:40:001:42:00 best 1:30:48 best 1:30:48 · Glasgow

This line shows the finish time of Emma Pemberton at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:30:48 at Glasgow (Mar 2025); Emma Pemberton was 3:11 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Birmingham Oct 2024 Open Women 1:39:15
Glasgow Mar 2025 Open Women 1:30:48
Manchester Jan 2026 Open Women 1:43:57
Barcelona May 2026 Open Women 1:31:21
Birmingham Oct 2026 Open Women 1:36:04

Each dot is one Open Women race; click one for that race's report. From the first Open Women race to the best: 8:27 faster (1:39:15 to 1:30:48).

Every race

7 results at 7 races

Tap a result for its full report
Open Women, 35-39 1:36:04 1537th of 2,703; 267th of 450 aged 35-39 50:06 37:19 8:43 Runs 50:06 · Stations 37:19 · Roxzone 8:43

1,537th of 2,703 Open Women (faster than 43%). Against the 83 who finished around 1:35:02: most time gained on wall balls (1:56), most lost on the eight runs (4:10). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:51 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:02 more).

Emma Pemberton at HYROX Birmingham Birm, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 2,703 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,703 Open Women here
Run 1: 6:03 6:02 faster than 48%
SkiErg: 5:13 5:14 faster than 52%
Run 2: 6:04 5:18 faster than 21%
Sled push: 3:58 3:12 faster than 17%
Run 3: 6:04 5:31 faster than 30%
Sled pull: 5:33 5:25 faster than 46%
Run 4: 5:58 5:33 faster than 34%
Burpee broad jump: 5:13 6:40 faster than 80%
Run 5: 5:59 5:39 faster than 38%
Row: 5:28 5:26 faster than 48%
Run 6: 6:36 5:32 faster than 18%
Farmers carry: 2:11 2:18 faster than 60%
Run 7: 6:52 5:32 faster than 14%
Sandbag lunges: 4:39 5:01 faster than 61%
Run 8: 6:34 5:47 faster than 29%
Wall balls: 5:04 6:48 faster than 85%
Roxzone: 8:43 7:16 faster than 26%
Runs (8 km) 50:06 44:53 faster than 28%
Stations (8) 37:19
Finish 1:36:04 1:32:53 1537th of 2,703 · faster than 43%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 35-39 1:31:21 552nd of 1,296; 90th of 214 aged 35-39 47:00 36:45 7:41 Runs 47:00 · Stations 36:45 · Roxzone 7:41

552nd of 1,296 Open Women (faster than 57%). Against the 39 who finished around 1:32:07: most time gained on sandbag lunges (1:16), most lost on the eight runs (2:11). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:50 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:45 more).

Emma Pemberton at HYROX Barcelona 2026, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,296 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,296 Open Women here
Run 1: 5:15 5:15 faster than 50%
SkiErg: 5:27 5:30 faster than 55%
Run 2: 5:30 5:24 faster than 45%
Sled push: 3:16 3:12 faster than 46%
Run 3: 5:54 5:45 faster than 42%
Sled pull: 5:26 5:46 faster than 59%
Run 4: 5:57 5:44 faster than 40%
Burpee broad jump: 5:32 6:31 faster than 71%
Run 5: 5:52 5:48 faster than 46%
Row: 5:28 5:34 faster than 58%
Run 6: 6:00 5:42 faster than 36%
Farmers carry: 2:14 2:21 faster than 61%
Run 7: 6:04 5:41 faster than 32%
Sandbag lunges: 3:39 4:59 faster than 89%
Run 8: 6:30 5:59 faster than 31%
Wall balls: 5:43 6:27 faster than 66%
Roxzone: 7:41 7:21 faster than 43%
Runs (8 km) 47:00 45:31 faster than 40%
Stations (8) 36:45
Finish 1:31:21 1:33:47 552nd of 1,296 · faster than 57%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 35-39 1:43:57 938th of 1,356; 151st of 228 aged 35-39 53:29 42:55 7:36 Runs 53:29 · Stations 42:55 · Roxzone 7:36

938th of 1,356 Open Women (faster than 30%). Against the 41 who finished around 1:44:23: most time gained on wall balls (1:38), most lost on the eight runs (2:08). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:30 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:05 more).

Emma Pemberton at HYROX Manchester 2026, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,356 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,356 Open Women here
Run 1: 4:23 4:13 faster than 40%
SkiErg: 5:05 5:07 faster than 54%
Run 2: 6:50 5:56 faster than 23%
Sled push: 3:04 2:39 faster than 23%
Run 3: 7:09 6:18 faster than 25%
Sled pull: 6:40 5:28 faster than 19%
Run 4: 7:09 6:20 faster than 26%
Burpee broad jump: 8:40 6:43 faster than 23%
Run 5: 7:19 6:29 faster than 26%
Row: 5:50 5:24 faster than 20%
Run 6: 7:18 6:22 faster than 23%
Farmers carry: 2:10 2:18 faster than 63%
Run 7: 7:14 6:18 faster than 23%
Sandbag lunges: 5:02 5:17 faster than 56%
Run 8: 6:10 5:20 faster than 29%
Wall balls: 6:24 6:41 faster than 55%
Roxzone: 7:36 6:08 faster than 29%
Runs (8 km) 53:29 47:39 faster than 26%
Stations (8) 42:55
Finish 1:43:57 1:34:09 938th of 1,356 · faster than 30%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Mixed, team 30-34, with Alex Henderson 1:36:51 1901st of 2,158; 470th of 514 aged 30-34 54:09 33:36 9:09 Runs 54:09 · Stations 33:36 · Roxzone 9:09

1,901st of 2,158 Doubles Mixed (faster than 11%). Against the 64 who finished around 1:38:49: most time gained on wall balls (1:00), most lost on the eight runs (0:28). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:44 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:07 more).

Emma Pemberton at HYROX Birmingham 2025, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 2,158 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,158 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 6:25 5:59 faster than 32%
SkiErg: 4:44 4:18 faster than 9%
Run 2: 6:17 5:06 faster than 9%
Sled push: 2:34 2:18 faster than 33%
Run 3: 6:46 5:21 faster than 8%
Sled pull: 5:14 4:01 faster than 10%
Run 4: 6:16 5:23 faster than 18%
Burpee broad jump: 4:32 3:32 faster than 18%
Run 5: 6:50 5:30 faster than 11%
Row: 5:12 4:43 faster than 14%
Run 6: 6:57 5:25 faster than 8%
Farmers carry: 2:11 1:47 faster than 9%
Run 7: 7:22 5:26 faster than 5%
Sandbag lunges: 4:01 3:52 faster than 43%
Run 8: 7:19 5:27 faster than 8%
Wall balls: 5:08 4:39 faster than 33%
Roxzone: 9:09 6:30 faster than 9%
Runs (8 km) 54:09 43:41 faster than 9%
Stations (8) 33:36
Finish 1:36:51 1:19:51 1901st of 2,158 · faster than 11%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 30-34 1:30:48 719th of 1,479; 154th of 277 aged 30-34 50:02 34:51 5:59 Runs 50:02 · Stations 34:51 · Roxzone 5:59

719th of 1,479 Open Women (faster than 51%). Against the 46 who finished around 1:31:22: most time gained on sandbag lunges (1:08), most lost on the eight runs (3:53). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:58 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:51 more).

Emma Pemberton at HYROX Glasgow 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,479 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,479 Open Women here
Run 1: 4:13 4:09 faster than 45%
SkiErg: 5:06 5:05 faster than 48%
Run 2: 6:10 5:50 faster than 35%
Sled push: 2:20 2:43 faster than 77%
Run 3: 6:47 6:06 faster than 25%
Sled pull: 4:55 5:12 faster than 62%
Run 4: 6:54 6:07 faster than 23%
Burpee broad jump: 6:06 6:33 faster than 59%
Run 5: 7:03 6:21 faster than 28%
Row: 5:26 5:23 faster than 45%
Run 6: 6:34 6:14 faster than 38%
Farmers carry: 1:54 2:11 faster than 81%
Run 7: 6:44 6:14 faster than 32%
Sandbag lunges: 3:49 4:58 faster than 88%
Run 8: 5:41 5:12 faster than 37%
Wall balls: 5:15 6:10 faster than 75%
Roxzone: 5:59 5:37 faster than 42%
Runs (8 km) 50:02 46:43 faster than 34%
Stations (8) 34:51
Finish 1:30:48 1:31:22 719th of 1,479 · faster than 51%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 30-39, with Katy Hawkins 1:28:50 341st of 486; 134th of 180 aged 30-39 47:54 33:20 7:38 Runs 47:54 · Stations 33:20 · Roxzone 7:38

341st of 486 Doubles Women (faster than 29%).

Emma Pemberton at HYROX Manchester 2024, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 486 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 486 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:06 4:15 faster than 60%
SkiErg: 4:48 4:28 faster than 12%
Run 2: 6:05 5:56 faster than 43%
Sled push: 2:03 1:35 faster than 6%
Run 3: 6:01 6:09 faster than 58%
Sled pull: 5:19 3:52 faster than 4%
Run 4: 6:00 6:11 faster than 60%
Burpee broad jump: 5:40 4:11 faster than 9%
Run 5: 6:20 6:17 faster than 48%
Row: 5:34 4:59 faster than 6%
Run 6: 6:25 6:14 faster than 43%
Farmers carry: 1:41 1:41 faster than 51%
Run 7: 6:24 6:18 faster than 46%
Sandbag lunges: 3:30 3:29 faster than 49%
Run 8: 6:37 6:32 faster than 46%
Wall balls: 4:45 4:01 faster than 19%
Roxzone: 7:38 6:01 faster than 17%
Runs (8 km) 47:54 47:57 faster than 50%
Stations (8) 33:20
Finish 1:28:50 1:23:09 341st of 486 · faster than 29%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 30-34 1:39:15 881st of 1,410; 181st of 263 aged 30-34 49:00 41:01 9:18 Runs 49:00 · Stations 41:01 · Roxzone 9:18

881st of 1,410 Open Women (faster than 37%). Against the 43 who finished around 1:38:24: most time gained on sandbag lunges (0:58), most lost on the eight runs (1:44). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:15 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:32 more).

Emma Pemberton at HYROX Birmingham 2024, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,410 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,410 Open Women here
Run 1: 6:33 6:07 faster than 29%
SkiErg: 5:08 5:05 faster than 46%
Run 2: 5:39 5:20 faster than 33%
Sled push: 3:06 2:40 faster than 22%
Run 3: 5:59 5:32 faster than 27%
Sled pull: 6:30 5:41 faster than 27%
Run 4: 6:13 5:37 faster than 22%
Burpee broad jump: 6:37 7:03 faster than 57%
Run 5: 6:06 5:46 faster than 36%
Row: 5:35 5:25 faster than 36%
Run 6: 5:59 5:39 faster than 34%
Farmers carry: 2:15 2:13 faster than 48%
Run 7: 5:57 5:37 faster than 34%
Sandbag lunges: 4:22 5:02 faster than 71%
Run 8: 6:37 6:02 faster than 32%
Wall balls: 7:28 6:45 faster than 37%
Roxzone: 9:18 8:04 faster than 28%
Runs (8 km) 49:00 45:50 faster than 31%
Stations (8) 41:01
Finish 1:39:15 1:34:24 881st of 1,410 · faster than 37%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group.

Best splits · Open Women

The fastest Emma has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 5:05 Manchester 2026 · best of 5 5:16
Sled push 2:20 Glasgow 2025 · best of 5 2:55
Sled pull 4:55 Glasgow 2025 · best of 5 5:47
Burpee broad jump 5:13 Birmingham Birm · best of 5 6:46
Row 5:26 Glasgow 2025 · best of 5 5:31
Farmers carry 1:54 Glasgow 2025 · best of 5 2:19
Sandbag lunges 3:39 Barcelona 2026 · best of 5 5:13
Wall balls 5:04 Birmingham Birm · best of 5 6:43
Runs (8 km) 47:00 Barcelona 2026 · best of 5 46:44
Roxzone 5:59 Glasgow 2025 · best of 5 7:57
How to read

Each station's best across Emma's Open Women races, from different races, against the typical Open Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

2 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Women race

Glasgow 2025, against 1,479 Open Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Emmaedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Emma sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Lunges (faster than 88% of the field), weakest on Runs (faster than 34%).

See the numbers
Part Emma: faster than
Ski 49%
Push 78%
Pull 62%
BBJ 59%
Row 45%
Carry 82%
Lunges 88%
Wall balls 75%
Roxzone 42%
Runs 34%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 49%
Sled push faster than 78%
Sled pull faster than 62%
Burpee broad jump faster than 59%
Row faster than 45%
Farmers carry faster than 82%
Sandbag lunges faster than 88%
Wall balls faster than 75%
Roxzone faster than 42%
Runs (8 km) faster than 34%

How much of the field Emma beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Sandbag lunges (faster than 88%); weakest: Runs (8 km) (faster than 34%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:01 slower
Sled push 0:23 faster
Sled pull 0:17 faster
Burpee broad jump 0:27 faster
Row 0:03 slower
Farmers carry 0:17 faster
Sandbag lunges 1:09 faster
Wall balls 0:55 faster
Roxzone 0:22 slower
Runs (8 km) 3:19 slower

Emma's time on each part against the typical Open Women finisher at this race.Best: Sandbag lunges (1:09 faster); weakest: Runs (8 km) (3:19 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Emma against the typical Open Women finisher

Emma1:30:48
4:135:066:102:206:474:556:546:067:035:266:341:546:443:495:415:155:59
Typical Open Women1:30:05
4:095:055:502:436:065:126:076:336:215:236:142:116:144:585:126:105:37
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Emma: 50:06 running, 34:51 at the stations and 5:59 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (6:06).Below, Typical Open Women: 46:13 running, 38:15 at the stations and 5:37 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (6:33).

See the numbers
Part Emma Typical Open Women
Run 1 4:13 4:09
SkiErg 5:06 5:05
Run 2 6:10 5:50
Sled push 2:20 2:43
Run 3 6:47 6:06
Sled pull 4:55 5:12
Run 4 6:54 6:07
Burpee broad jump 6:06 6:33
Run 5 7:03 6:21
Row 5:26 5:23
Run 6 6:34 6:14
Farmers carry 1:54 2:11
Run 7 6:44 6:14
Sandbag lunges 3:49 4:58
Run 8 5:41 5:12
Wall balls 5:15 6:10
Roxzone 5:59 5:37
Finish 1:30:48 1:31:22

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Roxzone cost 0:22 against the typical Open Women finisher at Glasgow 2025. The pacing guide is where that time comes back.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix roxzone. Then beat 1:30:48.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report