Athlete · Open Women · 35-39 · USA USA

Elizabeth Smith

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/elizabeth-smith-0fbf1d7d

13 HYROX races over 2 seasons: 4 solo, 9 in a team with 10 partners.

Two results in one division at the same race (Doubles Women at Salt Lake City 2026): either two athletes called Elizabeth Smith, or one athlete who raced twice. Both are shown as published; the bests use the faster one.

Best Open Women time1:46:27Washington DC 2026
Best Open Women place771stof 1,044 · Washington DC 2026
Latest race1:32:40Birmingham Oct Birm · Doubles Mixed with Cameron Barton7:41 slower than Elizabeth's best Doubles Mixed time (1:24:59)
Strongest part of the raceSkiErgfaster than 90% of Open Women at Washington DC 2026
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Finish time, race by race: one race type at a time

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:48:001:50:001:52:001:54:001:56:00 best 1:46:27 best 1:46:27 · Washington DC

This line shows the finish time of Elizabeth Smith at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:46:27 at Washington DC (Mar 2026); Elizabeth Smith was 9:50 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Boston Sep 2025 Open Women 1:56:17
Chicago Nov 2025 Open Women 1:48:45
Phoenix Jan 2026 Open Women 1:56:16
Washington DC Mar 2026 Open Women 1:46:27

Each dot is one Open Women race; click one for that race's report. From the first Open Women race to the best: 9:50 faster (1:56:17 to 1:46:27).

Every race

13 results at 9 races

Tap a result for its full report
Birmingham Oct Birm 27–30 Oct 2026 · 2 results
Race results
Doubles Mixed, team 16-24, with Cameron Barton 1:32:40 2617th of 3,498; 231st of 355 aged 16-24 53:50 30:46 8:11 Runs 53:50 · Stations 30:46 · Roxzone 8:11

2,617th of 3,498 Doubles Mixed (faster than 25%). Against the 96 who finished around 1:30:00: most time gained on burpee broad jump (1:03), most lost on the eight runs (5:09). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:22 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:27 more).

Elizabeth Smith at HYROX Birmingham Oct Birm, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 3,498 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,498 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 6:57 5:51 faster than 14%
SkiErg: 4:30 4:18 faster than 28%
Run 2: 6:29 5:08 faster than 8%
Sled push: 2:35 2:26 faster than 38%
Run 3: 6:46 5:23 faster than 10%
Sled pull: 4:11 3:56 faster than 38%
Run 4: 6:34 5:24 faster than 13%
Burpee broad jump: 3:21 3:47 faster than 67%
Run 5: 6:41 5:29 faster than 14%
Row: 4:44 4:45 faster than 52%
Run 6: 6:33 5:25 faster than 15%
Farmers carry: 2:20 1:47 faster than 5%
Run 7: 6:48 5:27 faster than 12%
Sandbag lunges: 4:11 4:03 faster than 44%
Run 8: 7:06 5:30 faster than 12%
Wall balls: 4:54 4:45 faster than 44%
Roxzone: 8:11 6:34 faster than 21%
Runs (8 km) 53:50 43:45 faster than 12%
Stations (8) 30:46
Finish 1:32:40 1:22:06 2617th of 3,498 · faster than 25%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Megan Denny 1:23:55 1517th of 3,479; 302nd of 606 aged 25-29 48:40 28:17 7:03 Runs 48:40 · Stations 28:17 · Roxzone 7:03

1,517th of 3,479 Doubles Women (faster than 56%). Against the 108 who finished around 1:24:17: most time gained on sandbag lunges (0:33), most lost on the eight runs (2:20). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:18 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:00 more).

Elizabeth Smith at HYROX Birmingham Oct Birm, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 3,479 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,479 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:54 6:27 faster than 34%
SkiErg: 4:36 4:46 faster than 73%
Run 2: 5:43 5:37 faster than 44%
Sled push: 1:45 2:05 faster than 91%
Run 3: 5:56 5:50 faster than 45%
Sled pull: 3:53 4:10 faster than 67%
Run 4: 5:58 5:53 faster than 45%
Burpee broad jump: 4:09 4:29 faster than 61%
Run 5: 5:58 5:57 faster than 49%
Row: 5:03 5:11 faster than 64%
Run 6: 6:01 5:54 faster than 44%
Farmers carry: 1:37 1:49 faster than 81%
Run 7: 6:03 5:54 faster than 44%
Sandbag lunges: 3:12 3:46 faster than 79%
Run 8: 6:11 5:58 faster than 41%
Wall balls: 4:02 4:34 faster than 78%
Roxzone: 7:03 7:10 faster than 53%
Runs (8 km) 48:40 47:32 faster than 43%
Stations (8) 28:17
Finish 1:23:55 1:25:56 1517th of 3,479 · faster than 56%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

tampa Tamp 23 Oct 2026
Race results
Doubles Women, team 35-39, with Emily Oeffinger 2:05:00 1841st of 1,920; 415th of 430 aged 35-39 1:10:13 42:21 12:31 Runs 1:10:13 · Stations 42:21 · Roxzone 12:31

1,841st of 1,920 Doubles Women (faster than 4%). Against the 58 who finished around 2:03:20: most time gained on sled pull (0:29), most lost on burpee broad jump (1:23). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:31 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 3:18 more).

Elizabeth Smith at HYROX tampa Tamp, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,920 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,920 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 7:27 6:09 faster than 11%
SkiErg: 5:33 4:55 faster than 8%
Run 2: 8:25 6:12 faster than 4%
Sled push: 1:45 1:52 faster than 66%
Run 3: 8:41 6:31 faster than 7%
Sled pull: 5:05 4:19 faster than 21%
Run 4: 8:50 6:31 faster than 7%
Burpee broad jump: 8:19 4:18 faster than 2%
Run 5: 9:33 6:34 faster than 4%
Row: 6:04 5:14 faster than 5%
Run 6: 8:52 6:31 faster than 7%
Farmers carry: 2:32 1:56 faster than 2%
Run 7: 8:33 6:27 faster than 9%
Sandbag lunges: 6:34 3:53 faster than 2%
Run 8: 9:56 6:28 faster than 4%
Wall balls: 6:29 4:32 faster than 9%
Roxzone: 12:31 8:12 faster than 5%
Runs (8 km) 1:10:13 51:41 faster than 5%
Stations (8) 42:21
Finish 2:05:00 1:31:24 1841st of 1,920 · faster than 4%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Salt Lake City 2026 18 Sep 2026 · 2 results
Race results
Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Heather Wyatt 2:28:47 1620th of 1,633; 296th of 297 aged 25-29 1:40:05 34:08 14:38 Runs 1:40:05 · Stations 34:08 · Roxzone 14:38

1,620th of 1,633 Doubles Women (faster than 0%). Against the 49 who finished around 2:04:36: most time gained on wall balls (2:05), most lost on the eight runs (29:58). Runs 5 to 8 took 28:18 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 7:57 more).

Elizabeth Smith at HYROX Salt Lake City 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,633 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,633 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:15 3:56 faster than 3%
SkiErg: 5:06 4:59 faster than 38%
Run 2: 9:56 6:20 faster than 2%
Sled push: 1:26 1:39 faster than 83%
Run 3: 9:53 6:38 faster than 3%
Sled pull: 3:35 4:14 faster than 83%
Run 4: 10:52 6:42 faster than 2%
Burpee broad jump: 6:31 4:26 faster than 10%
Run 5: 24:45 6:51 faster than 0%
Row: 5:31 5:19 faster than 32%
Run 6: 12:11 6:47 faster than 0%
Farmers carry: 2:02 1:52 faster than 28%
Run 7: 11:40 6:48 faster than 1%
Sandbag lunges: 5:33 3:52 faster than 7%
Run 8: 15:38 6:52 faster than 0%
Wall balls: 4:24 4:35 faster than 59%
Roxzone: 14:38 10:20 faster than 7%
Runs (8 km) 1:40:05 51:08 faster than 0%
Stations (8) 34:08
Finish 2:28:47 1:33:03 1620th of 1,633 · faster than 0%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Hailey Barnett 1:50:54 1381st of 1,633; 249th of 297 aged 25-29 1:06:21 31:46 12:53 Runs 1:06:21 · Stations 31:46 · Roxzone 12:53

1,381st of 1,633 Doubles Women (faster than 15%). Against the 49 who finished around 1:51:30: most time gained on wall balls (1:17), most lost on the eight runs (3:55). Runs 5 to 8 took 6:09 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 5:50 more).

Elizabeth Smith at HYROX Salt Lake City 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,633 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,633 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 3:48 3:56 faster than 58%
SkiErg: 5:04 4:59 faster than 42%
Run 2: 7:45 6:20 faster than 12%
Sled push: 1:43 1:39 faster than 41%
Run 3: 9:29 6:38 faster than 5%
Sled pull: 4:07 4:14 faster than 55%
Run 4: 9:06 6:42 faster than 7%
Burpee broad jump: 4:43 4:26 faster than 41%
Run 5: 8:57 6:51 faster than 10%
Row: 5:40 5:19 faster than 22%
Run 6: 8:55 6:47 faster than 9%
Farmers carry: 2:02 1:52 faster than 28%
Run 7: 8:57 6:48 faster than 9%
Sandbag lunges: 4:22 3:52 faster than 29%
Run 8: 9:28 6:52 faster than 9%
Wall balls: 4:05 4:35 faster than 74%
Roxzone: 12:53 10:20 faster than 18%
Runs (8 km) 1:06:21 51:08 faster than 9%
Stations (8) 31:46
Finish 1:50:54 1:33:03 1381st of 1,633 · faster than 15%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 35-39, with Emily Oeffinger 2:10:05 2006th of 2,097; 462nd of 475 aged 35-39 1:10:52 47:34 11:42 Runs 1:10:52 · Stations 47:34 · Roxzone 11:42

2,006th of 2,097 Doubles Women (faster than 4%). Against the 63 who finished around 2:08:34: most time gained on the eight runs (1:46), most lost on wall balls (3:33). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:25 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 4:06 more).

Elizabeth Smith at HYROX Houston 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,097 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,097 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 8:46 6:42 faster than 4%
SkiErg: 5:38 4:58 faster than 7%
Run 2: 8:04 6:02 faster than 8%
Sled push: 2:20 2:01 faster than 22%
Run 3: 10:04 6:17 faster than 2%
Sled pull: 5:51 4:44 faster than 16%
Run 4: 8:21 6:21 faster than 11%
Burpee broad jump: 8:46 4:27 faster than 1%
Run 5: 9:06 6:32 faster than 8%
Row: 6:10 5:19 faster than 5%
Run 6: 8:43 6:26 faster than 10%
Farmers carry: 2:28 1:58 faster than 6%
Run 7: 8:31 6:26 faster than 12%
Sandbag lunges: 6:26 3:56 faster than 4%
Run 8: 9:21 6:39 faster than 10%
Wall balls: 9:55 4:35 faster than 0%
Roxzone: 11:42 8:37 faster than 13%
Runs (8 km) 1:10:52 51:34 faster than 7%
Stations (8) 47:34
Finish 2:10:05 1:33:03 2006th of 2,097 · faster than 4%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 35-39 1:46:27 771st of 1,044; 170th of 221 aged 35-39 57:07 40:48 8:37 Runs 57:07 · Stations 40:48 · Roxzone 8:37

771st of 1,044 Open Women (faster than 26%). Against the 32 who finished around 1:47:23: most time gained on sled pull (1:08), most lost on the eight runs (4:15). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:56 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:16 less).

Elizabeth Smith at HYROX Washington DC 2026, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,044 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,044 Open Women here
Run 1: 8:31 6:52 faster than 12%
SkiErg: 4:48 5:14 faster than 89%
Run 2: 6:51 5:19 faster than 11%
Sled push: 2:35 2:30 faster than 44%
Run 3: 6:48 5:34 faster than 17%
Sled pull: 5:10 5:30 faster than 60%
Run 4: 7:24 5:38 faster than 11%
Burpee broad jump: 6:22 6:13 faster than 47%
Run 5: 7:36 5:54 faster than 14%
Row: 5:32 5:27 faster than 44%
Run 6: 6:39 5:44 faster than 24%
Farmers carry: 2:15 2:16 faster than 52%
Run 7: 6:51 5:43 faster than 21%
Sandbag lunges: 6:54 5:10 faster than 17%
Run 8: 6:32 5:24 faster than 24%
Wall balls: 7:12 6:21 faster than 34%
Roxzone: 8:37 7:33 faster than 33%
Runs (8 km) 57:07 46:13 faster than 17%
Stations (8) 40:48
Finish 1:46:27 1:32:47 771st of 1,044 · faster than 26%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Phoenix Jan 2026 30 Jan – 1 Feb 2026 · 2 results
Race results
Open Women, 35-39 1:56:16 978th of 1,180; 199th of 230 aged 35-39 58:23 49:00 8:57 Runs 58:23 · Stations 49:00 · Roxzone 8:57

978th of 1,180 Open Women (faster than 17%).

Elizabeth Smith at HYROX Phoenix Jan 2026, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,180 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,180 Open Women here
Run 1: 6:21 5:33 faster than 17%
SkiErg: 5:00 5:13 faster than 71%
Run 2: 6:54 5:32 faster than 10%
Sled push: 2:31 2:32 faster than 54%
Run 3: 7:00 5:48 faster than 15%
Sled pull: 5:06 5:23 faster than 61%
Run 4: 7:35 5:50 faster than 10%
Burpee broad jump: 11:29 6:36 faster than 5%
Run 5: 7:44 6:05 faster than 12%
Row: 5:38 5:35 faster than 46%
Run 6: 7:26 5:59 faster than 14%
Farmers carry: 2:10 2:10 faster than 51%
Run 7: 6:58 6:00 faster than 22%
Sandbag lunges: 8:24 5:17 faster than 6%
Run 8: 8:28 6:27 faster than 16%
Wall balls: 8:42 6:41 faster than 23%
Roxzone: 8:57 7:14 faster than 20%
Runs (8 km) 58:23 47:30 faster than 14%
Stations (8) 49:00
Finish 1:56:16 1:35:18 978th of 1,180 · faster than 17%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Chicago 2025 14 Nov 2025 · 2 results
Race results
Open Women, 35-39 1:48:45 894th of 1,127; 203rd of 249 aged 35-39 57:20 43:52 7:37 Runs 57:20 · Stations 43:52 · Roxzone 7:37

894th of 1,127 Open Women (faster than 20%). Against the 34 who finished around 1:49:06: most time gained on wall balls (1:20), most lost on the eight runs (3:03). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:32 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 4:19 more).

Elizabeth Smith at HYROX Chicago 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,127 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,127 Open Women here
Run 1: 4:30 4:18 faster than 38%
SkiErg: 4:48 5:08 faster than 80%
Run 2: 6:55 5:47 faster than 16%
Sled push: 2:00 2:13 faster than 70%
Run 3: 8:16 6:03 faster than 4%
Sled pull: 6:23 5:22 faster than 25%
Run 4: 7:15 6:08 faster than 16%
Burpee broad jump: 8:50 6:33 faster than 17%
Run 5: 7:41 6:15 faster than 15%
Row: 5:30 5:23 faster than 39%
Run 6: 7:14 6:10 faster than 20%
Farmers carry: 2:03 2:06 faster than 56%
Run 7: 7:03 6:08 faster than 23%
Sandbag lunges: 6:42 5:06 faster than 17%
Run 8: 8:30 6:57 faster than 18%
Wall balls: 7:36 6:30 faster than 30%
Roxzone: 7:37 6:39 faster than 32%
Runs (8 km) 57:20 47:53 faster than 16%
Stations (8) 43:52
Finish 1:48:45 1:33:19 894th of 1,127 · faster than 20%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Mixed, team 25-29, with Neil Cooksey 1:24:59 607th of 1,179; 149th of 248 aged 25-29 52:23 26:02 6:37 Runs 52:23 · Stations 26:02 · Roxzone 6:37

607th of 1,179 Doubles Mixed (faster than 48%). Against the 36 who finished around 1:24:33: most time gained on sandbag lunges (1:05), most lost on the eight runs (3:49). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:49 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:52 more).

Elizabeth Smith at HYROX Chicago 2025, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 1,179 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,179 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 4:52 4:25 faster than 25%
SkiErg: 4:15 4:15 faster than 51%
Run 2: 6:06 5:51 faster than 39%
Sled push: 1:35 1:50 faster than 81%
Run 3: 7:00 6:09 faster than 19%
Sled pull: 3:31 4:08 faster than 79%
Run 4: 6:51 6:13 faster than 27%
Burpee broad jump: 3:03 3:48 faster than 84%
Run 5: 7:13 6:22 faster than 23%
Row: 4:31 4:46 faster than 76%
Run 6: 6:46 6:14 faster than 32%
Farmers carry: 1:37 1:52 faster than 84%
Run 7: 6:50 6:13 faster than 31%
Sandbag lunges: 2:56 3:54 faster than 91%
Run 8: 6:49 6:56 faster than 53%
Wall balls: 4:34 4:35 faster than 51%
Roxzone: 6:37 6:18 faster than 42%
Runs (8 km) 52:23 48:29 faster than 31%
Stations (8) 26:02
Finish 1:24:59 1:24:33 607th of 1,179 · faster than 48%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 30-34 1:56:17 1082nd of 1,291; 227th of 277 aged 30-34 1:00:38 46:26 9:17 Runs 1:00:38 · Stations 46:26 · Roxzone 9:17

1,082nd of 1,291 Open Women (faster than 16%). Against the 38 who finished around 1:57:30: most time gained on wall balls (2:22), most lost on the eight runs (4:13). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:00 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:07 more).

Elizabeth Smith at HYROX Boston 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,291 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,291 Open Women here
Run 1: 9:05 6:37 faster than 3%
SkiErg: 5:08 5:16 faster than 64%
Run 2: 7:08 5:29 faster than 6%
Sled push: 2:42 2:33 faster than 39%
Run 3: 7:22 5:46 faster than 9%
Sled pull: 6:07 6:09 faster than 51%
Run 4: 7:15 5:49 faster than 11%
Burpee broad jump: 9:24 6:35 faster than 15%
Run 5: 7:48 5:55 faster than 10%
Row: 5:37 5:28 faster than 38%
Run 6: 7:13 5:48 faster than 13%
Farmers carry: 2:24 2:10 faster than 28%
Run 7: 7:10 5:42 faster than 13%
Sandbag lunges: 7:48 5:03 faster than 8%
Run 8: 7:39 6:21 faster than 22%
Wall balls: 7:16 7:05 faster than 46%
Roxzone: 9:17 6:57 faster than 17%
Runs (8 km) 1:00:38 47:39 faster than 10%
Stations (8) 46:26
Finish 1:56:17 1:35:15 1082nd of 1,291 · faster than 16%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's, and a relay place is among all relay teams at that race (relay teams are ranked together). Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. A dash in runs, stations and roxzone on a result from the live results service means the splits are not in yet (finish time only). The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. A dash means the organiser did not publish that number for the result. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Open Women

The fastest Elizabeth has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:48 Washington DC 2026 · best of 4 5:16
Sled push 2:00 Chicago 2025 · best of 4 2:55
Sled pull 5:06 Phoenix Jan 2026 · best of 4 5:47
Burpee broad jump 6:22 Washington DC 2026 · best of 4 6:46
Row 5:30 Chicago 2025 · best of 4 5:31
Farmers carry 2:03 Chicago 2025 · best of 4 2:19
Sandbag lunges 6:42 Chicago 2025 · best of 4 5:13
Wall balls 7:12 Washington DC 2026 · best of 4 6:43
Runs (8 km) 57:07 Washington DC 2026 · best of 4 46:44
Roxzone 7:37 Chicago 2025 · best of 4 7:57
How to read

Each station's best across Elizabeth's Open Women races, from different races, against the typical Open Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

10 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Women race

Washington DC 2026, against 1,044 Open Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Elizabethedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Elizabeth sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Ski (faster than 90% of the field), weakest on Runs (faster than 17%).

See the numbers
Part Elizabeth: faster than
Ski 90%
Push 45%
Pull 61%
BBJ 47%
Row 44%
Carry 53%
Lunges 18%
Wall balls 35%
Roxzone 34%
Runs 17%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 90%
Sled push faster than 45%
Sled pull faster than 61%
Burpee broad jump faster than 47%
Row faster than 44%
Farmers carry faster than 53%
Sandbag lunges faster than 18%
Wall balls faster than 35%
Roxzone faster than 34%
Runs (8 km) faster than 17%

How much of the field Elizabeth beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: SkiErg (faster than 90%); weakest: Runs (8 km) (faster than 17%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:26 faster
Sled push 0:05 slower
Sled pull 0:20 faster
Burpee broad jump 0:09 slower
Row 0:05 slower
Farmers carry 0:01 faster
Sandbag lunges 1:44 slower
Wall balls 0:51 slower
Roxzone 1:04 slower
Runs (8 km) 10:54 slower

Elizabeth's time on each part against the typical Open Women finisher at this race.Best: SkiErg (0:26 faster); weakest: Runs (8 km) (10:54 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Elizabeth against the typical Open Women finisher

Elizabeth1:46:27
8:314:486:512:356:485:107:246:227:365:326:392:156:516:546:327:128:37
Typical Open Women1:32:22
6:525:145:192:305:345:305:386:135:545:275:442:165:435:105:246:217:33
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Elizabeth: 57:12 running, 40:48 at the stations and 8:37 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (7:12).Below, Typical Open Women: 46:08 running, 38:42 at the stations and 7:33 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (6:21).

See the numbers
Part Elizabeth Typical Open Women
Run 1 8:31 6:52
SkiErg 4:48 5:14
Run 2 6:51 5:19
Sled push 2:35 2:30
Run 3 6:48 5:34
Sled pull 5:10 5:30
Run 4 7:24 5:38
Burpee broad jump 6:22 6:13
Run 5 7:36 5:54
Row 5:32 5:27
Run 6 6:39 5:44
Farmers carry 2:15 2:16
Run 7 6:51 5:43
Sandbag lunges 6:54 5:10
Run 8 6:32 5:24
Wall balls 7:12 6:21
Roxzone 8:37 7:33
Finish 1:46:27 1:32:47

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Sandbag lunges cost 1:44 against the typical Open Women finisher at Washington DC 2026. The sandbag lunges guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix sandbag lunges. Then beat 1:46:27.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report