Athlete · Open Women · 30-34 · GBR GBR

Esme Hall

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/esme-hall-ce40afc1

6 HYROX races over 3 seasons: 1 solo, 5 in a team with 3 partners.

Two results in one division at the same race (Doubles Women at Birmingham Nov Birm; Doubles Women at Birmingham Oct Birm): either two athletes called Esme Hall, or one athlete who raced twice. Both are shown as published; the bests use the faster one.

Open Women time1:35:23Birmingham 2024
Open Women place734thof 1,410 · Birmingham 2024
Latest race1:20:00Birmingham Nov Birm · Doubles Women with Amy Brown4:57 slower than Esme's best Doubles Women time (1:15:03)
Strongest part of the raceSkiErgfaster than 97% of Open Women at Birmingham 2024
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:16:001:20:001:24:001:28:00 best 1:15:03 best 1:15:03 · Birmingham

This line shows the finish time of Esme Hall at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:15:03 at Birmingham (Oct 2024); Esme Hall was 4:57 slower at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Birmingham Oct 2024 Doubles Women 1:15:03
Cardiff Apr 2026 Doubles Women 1:30:29
Birmingham Oct 2026 Doubles Women 1:16:21
Birmingham Nov 2026 Doubles Women 1:20:00

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

6 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Birmingham Nov Birm 28 Oct – 1 Nov 2026 · 2 results
Race results
Doubles Women, team 30-34, with Amy Brown 1:20:00 1067th of 3,479; 259th of 661 aged 30-34 47:09 26:14 6:42 Runs 47:09 · Stations 26:14 · Roxzone 6:42

1,067th of 3,479 Doubles Women (faster than 69%). Against the 104 who finished around 1:19:48: most time gained on sandbag lunges (0:38), most lost on the eight runs (2:58). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:16 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:01 less).

Esme Hall at HYROX Birmingham Nov Birm, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 3,479 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,479 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:31 6:27 faster than 84%
SkiErg: 4:21 4:46 faster than 94%
Run 2: 5:33 5:37 faster than 53%
Sled push: 1:34 2:05 faster than 98%
Run 3: 5:58 5:50 faster than 43%
Sled pull: 3:19 4:10 faster than 94%
Run 4: 5:56 5:53 faster than 47%
Burpee broad jump: 3:35 4:29 faster than 83%
Run 5: 6:05 5:57 faster than 44%
Row: 5:03 5:11 faster than 64%
Run 6: 5:57 5:54 faster than 47%
Farmers carry: 1:35 1:49 faster than 84%
Run 7: 5:57 5:54 faster than 48%
Sandbag lunges: 2:49 3:46 faster than 94%
Run 8: 6:15 5:58 faster than 38%
Wall balls: 3:58 4:34 faster than 82%
Roxzone: 6:42 7:10 faster than 62%
Runs (8 km) 47:09 47:32 faster than 52%
Stations (8) 26:14
Finish 1:20:00 1:25:56 1067th of 3,479 · faster than 69%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 30-34, with Aimee Hunt 1:16:21 670th of 3,479; 171st of 661 aged 30-34 42:25 27:58 6:04 Runs 42:25 · Stations 27:58 · Roxzone 6:04

670th of 3,479 Doubles Women (faster than 80%). Against the 109 who finished around 1:16:40: most time gained on SkiErg (0:21), most lost on the eight runs (0:16). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:03 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:21 less).

Esme Hall at HYROX Birmingham Oct Birm, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 3,479 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,479 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:20 6:27 faster than 89%
SkiErg: 4:15 4:46 faster than 97%
Run 2: 4:53 5:37 faster than 83%
Sled push: 2:11 2:05 faster than 38%
Run 3: 5:10 5:50 faster than 80%
Sled pull: 3:40 4:10 faster than 81%
Run 4: 5:20 5:53 faster than 72%
Burpee broad jump: 3:55 4:29 faster than 71%
Run 5: 5:19 5:57 faster than 75%
Row: 4:42 5:11 faster than 92%
Run 6: 5:23 5:54 faster than 71%
Farmers carry: 1:49 1:49 faster than 51%
Run 7: 5:31 5:54 faster than 67%
Sandbag lunges: 3:20 3:46 faster than 73%
Run 8: 5:33 5:58 faster than 66%
Wall balls: 4:06 4:34 faster than 74%
Roxzone: 6:04 7:10 faster than 79%
Runs (8 km) 42:25 47:32 faster than 77%
Stations (8) 27:58
Finish 1:16:21 1:25:56 670th of 3,479 · faster than 80%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 30-34, with Amy Brown 1:30:29 1610th of 2,444; 347th of 479 aged 30-34 — 30:20 — Runs — · Stations 30:20 · Roxzone —

1,610th of 2,444 Doubles Women (faster than 34%). Against the 73 who finished around 1:30:12: most time gained on sled pull (1:08), most lost on sandbag lunges (1:49).

Esme Hall at HYROX Cardiff 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,444 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,444 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:58 6:21 faster than 68%
SkiErg: 4:29 4:50 faster than 90%
Run 2: 6:15 5:47 faster than 30%
Sled push: 1:39 1:52 faster than 80%
Run 3: 6:31 6:03 faster than 30%
Sled pull: 3:03 3:55 faster than 95%
Run 4: 7:03 6:05 faster than 18%
Burpee broad jump: 4:11 4:41 faster than 67%
Run 5: 7:36 6:11 faster than 13%
Row: 5:04 5:13 faster than 67%
Run 6: 20:35 6:27 faster than 0%
Farmers carry: 2:08 2:22 faster than 76%
Run 7: — 5:47
Sandbag lunges: 5:39 3:37 faster than 3%
Run 8: 17:05 6:59 faster than 0%
Wall balls: 4:07 4:20 faster than 64%
Roxzone: —
Runs (8 km) — 49:56
Stations (8) 30:20
Finish 1:30:29 1:25:36 1610th of 2,444 · faster than 34%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Doubles Women, team 30-34, with Tyla Jackson 1:22:43 187th of 278; 47th of 66 aged 30-34 45:27 31:14 6:07 Runs 45:27 · Stations 31:14 · Roxzone 6:07

187th of 278 Pro Doubles Women (faster than 32%).

Esme Hall at HYROX Birmingham 2025, Pro Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 278 Pro Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 278 Pro Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:08 5:36 faster than 29%
SkiErg: 4:21 4:29 faster than 72%
Run 2: 5:17 4:47 faster than 29%
Sled push: 3:12 2:33 faster than 14%
Run 3: 5:27 5:05 faster than 31%
Sled pull: 4:13 4:41 faster than 72%
Run 4: 5:37 5:08 faster than 27%
Burpee broad jump: 3:52 3:38 faster than 38%
Run 5: 5:53 5:09 faster than 22%
Row: 4:54 4:53 faster than 47%
Run 6: 5:37 5:07 faster than 27%
Farmers carry: 2:14 1:55 faster than 14%
Run 7: 5:39 5:09 faster than 27%
Sandbag lunges: 4:18 3:57 faster than 37%
Run 8: 5:52 5:06 faster than 23%
Wall balls: 4:10 4:17 faster than 58%
Roxzone: 6:07 5:58 faster than 47%
Runs (8 km) 45:27 41:12 faster than 28%
Stations (8) 31:14
Finish 1:22:43 1:17:36 187th of 278 · faster than 32%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Birmingham 2024 25 Oct 2024 · 2 results
Race results
Open Women, 30-34 1:35:23 734th of 1,410; 156th of 263 aged 30-34 47:42 39:37 8:08 Runs 47:42 · Stations 39:37 · Roxzone 8:08

734th of 1,410 Open Women (faster than 47%). Against the 43 who finished around 1:34:24: most time gained on wall balls (1:11), most lost on the eight runs (1:47). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:34 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:17 more).

Esme Hall at HYROX Birmingham 2024, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,410 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,410 Open Women here
Run 1: 6:24 6:07 faster than 36%
SkiErg: 4:33 5:05 faster than 97%
Run 2: 5:40 5:20 faster than 32%
Sled push: 2:44 2:40 faster than 45%
Run 3: 5:45 5:32 faster than 38%
Sled pull: 4:51 5:41 faster than 78%
Run 4: 5:47 5:37 faster than 41%
Burpee broad jump: 8:32 7:03 faster than 27%
Run 5: 5:59 5:46 faster than 40%
Row: 4:55 5:25 faster than 90%
Run 6: 5:58 5:39 faster than 35%
Farmers carry: 2:29 2:13 faster than 30%
Run 7: 5:51 5:37 faster than 38%
Sandbag lunges: 6:10 5:02 faster than 21%
Run 8: 6:22 6:02 faster than 39%
Wall balls: 5:23 6:45 faster than 78%
Roxzone: 8:08 8:04 faster than 49%
Runs (8 km) 47:42 45:50 faster than 39%
Stations (8) 39:37
Finish 1:35:23 1:34:24 734th of 1,410 · faster than 47%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team U29, with Tyla Jackson 1:15:03 182nd of 1,370; 67th of 424 aged U29 44:18 24:34 6:16 Runs 44:18 · Stations 24:34 · Roxzone 6:16

182nd of 1,370 Doubles Women (faster than 86%). Against the 41 who finished around 1:15:35: most time gained on sled pull (0:41), most lost on the eight runs (2:16). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:30 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:10 less).

Esme Hall at HYROX Birmingham 2024, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,370 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,370 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:22 6:28 faster than 54%
SkiErg: 4:13 4:37 faster than 96%
Run 2: 5:23 5:33 faster than 60%
Sled push: 1:37 1:46 faster than 75%
Run 3: 5:19 5:45 faster than 74%
Sled pull: 2:55 4:01 faster than 98%
Run 4: 5:21 5:50 faster than 75%
Burpee broad jump: 2:50 4:13 faster than 96%
Run 5: 5:26 5:56 faster than 75%
Row: 4:38 5:04 faster than 91%
Run 6: 5:23 5:53 faster than 76%
Farmers carry: 1:40 1:48 faster than 70%
Run 7: 5:29 5:53 faster than 71%
Sandbag lunges: 2:58 3:31 faster than 81%
Run 8: 5:38 6:06 faster than 72%
Wall balls: 3:43 4:22 faster than 90%
Roxzone: 6:16 8:05 faster than 89%
Runs (8 km) 44:18 47:20 faster than 71%
Stations (8) 24:34
Finish 1:15:03 1:24:53 182nd of 1,370 · faster than 86%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. A dash means the organiser did not publish that number for the result.

Raced with

3 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Women race

Birmingham 2024, against 1,410 Open Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Esmeedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Esme sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Ski (faster than 97% of the field), weakest on Lunges (faster than 22%).

See the numbers
Part Esme: faster than
Ski 97%
Push 45%
Pull 78%
BBJ 28%
Row 91%
Carry 31%
Lunges 22%
Wall balls 79%
Roxzone 49%
Runs 40%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 97%
Sled push faster than 45%
Sled pull faster than 78%
Burpee broad jump faster than 28%
Row faster than 91%
Farmers carry faster than 31%
Sandbag lunges faster than 22%
Wall balls faster than 79%
Roxzone faster than 49%
Runs (8 km) faster than 40%

How much of the field Esme beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: SkiErg (faster than 97%); weakest: Sandbag lunges (faster than 22%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:32 faster
Sled push 0:04 slower
Sled pull 0:50 faster
Burpee broad jump 1:29 slower
Row 0:30 faster
Farmers carry 0:16 slower
Sandbag lunges 1:08 slower
Wall balls 1:22 faster
Roxzone 0:04 slower
Runs (8 km) 1:52 slower

Esme's time on each part against the typical Open Women finisher at this race.Best: Wall balls (1:22 faster); weakest: Runs (8 km) (1:52 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Esme against the typical Open Women finisher

Esme1:35:23
6:244:335:402:445:454:515:478:325:594:555:582:295:516:106:225:238:08
Typical Open Women1:33:38
6:075:055:202:405:325:415:377:035:465:255:392:135:375:026:026:458:04
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Esme: 47:46 running, 39:37 at the stations and 8:08 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (8:32).Below, Typical Open Women: 45:40 running, 39:54 at the stations and 8:04 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (7:03).

See the numbers
Part Esme Typical Open Women
Run 1 6:24 6:07
SkiErg 4:33 5:05
Run 2 5:40 5:20
Sled push 2:44 2:40
Run 3 5:45 5:32
Sled pull 4:51 5:41
Run 4 5:47 5:37
Burpee broad jump 8:32 7:03
Run 5 5:59 5:46
Row 4:55 5:25
Run 6 5:58 5:39
Farmers carry 2:29 2:13
Run 7 5:51 5:37
Sandbag lunges 6:10 5:02
Run 8 6:22 6:02
Wall balls 5:23 6:45
Roxzone 8:08 8:04
Finish 1:35:23 1:34:24

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Burpee broad jump cost 1:29 against the typical Open Women finisher at Birmingham 2024. The burpee broad jump guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix burpee broad jump. Then beat 1:35:23.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report