Athlete · Doubles Women · team 45-49 · GBR GBR

Emily Gardner

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/emily-gardner-t-423e48

5 HYROX races over 2 seasons, all in a team with 2 partners. Best Doubles Women time: 1:22:17 at Glasgow 2025.

Best Doubles Women time1:22:17Glasgow 2025
Best Doubles Women place648thof 1,847 · Glasgow 2025
Latest race1:30:55Manchester 2026 · Doubles Women with Justine Leake8:38 slower than Emily's best Doubles Women time (1:22:17)
Strongest part of the raceRuns (8 km)faster than 73% of Doubles Women at Glasgow 2025

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:24:001:26:001:28:001:30:00 best 1:22:17

This line shows the finish time of Emily Gardner at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:22:17 at Glasgow (Mar 2025); Emily Gardner was 0:23 slower at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Birmingham Oct 2024 Doubles Women 1:30:32
Manchester Jan 2025 Doubles Women 1:22:47
Glasgow Mar 2025 Doubles Women 1:22:17
Birmingham Oct 2025 Doubles Women 1:23:52
Manchester Jan 2026 Doubles Women 1:30:55

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

5 results at 5 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Women, team 45-49, with Justine Leake 1:30:55 957th of 1,546; 56th of 107 aged 45-49 49:10 29:45 12:05 Runs 49:10 · Stations 29:45 · Roxzone 12:05

957th of 1,546 Doubles Women (faster than 38%). Against the 46 who finished around 1:30:13: most time gained on burpee broad jump (2:24), most lost on the roxzone (5:35). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:38 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:09 more).

Emily Gardner at HYROX Manchester 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,546 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,546 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:23 4:32 faster than 57%
SkiErg: 4:32 4:37 faster than 61%
Run 2: 6:14 6:17 faster than 52%
Sled push: 1:57 1:44 faster than 22%
Run 3: 6:23 6:33 faster than 57%
Sled pull: 4:34 4:03 faster than 25%
Run 4: 6:18 6:38 faster than 61%
Burpee broad jump: 2:24 4:28 faster than 96%
Run 5: 6:27 6:44 faster than 60%
Row: 5:42 5:07 faster than 10%
Run 6: 6:42 6:42 faster than 50%
Farmers carry: 2:00 1:54 faster than 36%
Run 7: 6:52 6:43 faster than 43%
Sandbag lunges: 2:48 3:49 faster than 95%
Run 8: 5:54 5:31 faster than 36%
Wall balls: 5:48 4:21 faster than 10%
Roxzone: 12:05 6:04 faster than 1%
Runs (8 km) 49:10 50:04 faster than 54%
Stations (8) 29:45
Finish 1:30:55 1:26:49 957th of 1,546 · faster than 38%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 45-49, with Justine Leake 1:23:52 1094th of 2,427; 64th of 180 aged 45-49 45:49 31:15 6:55 Runs 45:49 · Stations 31:15 · Roxzone 6:55

1,094th of 2,427 Doubles Women (faster than 54%). Against the 73 who finished around 1:23:52: most time gained on the eight runs (1:13), most lost on sandbag lunges (0:50). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:44 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:12 less).

Emily Gardner at HYROX Birmingham 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,427 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,427 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:14 6:34 faster than 64%
SkiErg: 4:34 4:45 faster than 75%
Run 2: 5:17 5:35 faster than 65%
Sled push: 1:47 1:56 faster than 67%
Run 3: 5:33 5:49 faster than 62%
Sled pull: 4:22 4:20 faster than 48%
Run 4: 5:30 5:54 faster than 68%
Burpee broad jump: 4:36 4:14 faster than 37%
Run 5: 5:53 5:59 faster than 55%
Row: 5:02 5:11 faster than 66%
Run 6: 5:48 5:53 faster than 54%
Farmers carry: 1:38 1:51 faster than 82%
Run 7: 5:36 5:53 faster than 63%
Sandbag lunges: 4:18 3:38 faster than 22%
Run 8: 6:01 5:54 faster than 44%
Wall balls: 4:58 4:23 faster than 23%
Roxzone: 6:55 7:03 faster than 54%
Runs (8 km) 45:49 47:38 faster than 60%
Stations (8) 31:15
Finish 1:23:52 1:25:22 1094th of 2,427 · faster than 54%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 40-49, with Toni Duce 1:22:17 648th of 1,847; 115th of 380 aged 40-49 46:39 30:05 5:37 Runs 46:39 · Stations 30:05 · Roxzone 5:37

648th of 1,847 Doubles Women (faster than 64%). Against the 58 who finished around 1:22:15: most time gained on the eight runs (1:08), most lost on burpee broad jump (0:49). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:32 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:12 more).

Emily Gardner at HYROX Glasgow 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,847 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,847 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:20 4:41 faster than 71%
SkiErg: 4:34 4:38 faster than 61%
Run 2: 5:47 6:22 faster than 79%
Sled push: 1:50 1:47 faster than 44%
Run 3: 5:55 6:39 faster than 80%
Sled pull: 4:00 3:55 faster than 45%
Run 4: 6:04 6:42 faster than 76%
Burpee broad jump: 4:40 4:15 faster than 36%
Run 5: 6:19 6:52 faster than 72%
Row: 5:14 5:10 faster than 43%
Run 6: 6:41 6:47 faster than 54%
Farmers carry: 1:41 1:49 faster than 70%
Run 7: 6:32 6:50 faster than 61%
Sandbag lunges: 3:58 3:42 faster than 38%
Run 8: 5:06 5:24 faster than 62%
Wall balls: 4:08 4:18 faster than 63%
Roxzone: 5:37 5:42 faster than 52%
Runs (8 km) 46:39 50:53 faster than 73%
Stations (8) 30:05
Finish 1:22:17 1:26:33 648th of 1,847 · faster than 64%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 40-49, with Toni Duce 1:22:47 382nd of 857; 58th of 177 aged 40-49 47:00 29:06 6:51 Runs 47:00 · Stations 29:06 · Roxzone 6:51

382nd of 857 Doubles Women (faster than 55%).

Emily Gardner at HYROX Manchester 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 857 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 857 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:16 4:23 faster than 56%
SkiErg: 4:27 4:33 faster than 64%
Run 2: 5:52 5:59 faster than 55%
Sled push: 1:41 1:41 faster than 52%
Run 3: 6:03 6:16 faster than 59%
Sled pull: 3:32 3:50 faster than 68%
Run 4: 6:06 6:21 faster than 60%
Burpee broad jump: 4:38 4:01 faster than 28%
Run 5: 6:11 6:24 faster than 60%
Row: 5:23 5:03 faster than 21%
Run 6: 6:09 6:22 faster than 59%
Farmers carry: 1:41 1:50 faster than 72%
Run 7: 6:13 6:22 faster than 57%
Sandbag lunges: 3:54 3:33 faster than 33%
Run 8: 6:10 6:20 faster than 55%
Wall balls: 3:50 4:04 faster than 67%
Roxzone: 6:51 7:08 faster than 58%
Runs (8 km) 47:00 48:51 faster than 61%
Stations (8) 29:06
Finish 1:22:47 1:24:05 382nd of 857 · faster than 55%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 30-39, with Toni Duce 1:30:32 933rd of 1,370; 427th of 603 aged 30-39 48:43 32:35 9:19 Runs 48:43 · Stations 32:35 · Roxzone 9:19

933rd of 1,370 Doubles Women (faster than 31%). Against the 44 who finished around 1:31:26: most time gained on the eight runs (1:43), most lost on sandbag lunges (1:01). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:45 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:13 more).

Emily Gardner at HYROX Birmingham 2024, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,370 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,370 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:43 6:28 faster than 36%
SkiErg: 4:26 4:37 faster than 76%
Run 2: 5:45 5:33 faster than 38%
Sled push: 1:50 1:46 faster than 41%
Run 3: 5:40 5:45 faster than 55%
Sled pull: 3:57 4:01 faster than 53%
Run 4: 5:53 5:50 faster than 47%
Burpee broad jump: 5:54 4:13 faster than 13%
Run 5: 6:02 5:56 faster than 44%
Row: 5:32 5:04 faster than 12%
Run 6: 6:06 5:53 faster than 36%
Farmers carry: 1:41 1:48 faster than 68%
Run 7: 6:08 5:53 faster than 37%
Sandbag lunges: 4:48 3:31 faster than 9%
Run 8: 6:30 6:06 faster than 34%
Wall balls: 4:27 4:22 faster than 45%
Roxzone: 9:19 8:05 faster than 27%
Runs (8 km) 48:43 47:20 faster than 41%
Stations (8) 32:35
Finish 1:30:32 1:24:53 933rd of 1,370 · faster than 31%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group.

Best splits · Doubles Women

The fastest Emily has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:26 Birmingham 2024 · best of 5 4:49
Sled push 1:41 Manchester 2025 · best of 5 1:52
Sled pull 3:32 Manchester 2025 · best of 5 4:13
Burpee broad jump 2:24 Manchester 2026 · best of 5 4:18
Row 5:02 Birmingham 2025 · best of 5 5:13
Farmers carry 1:38 Birmingham 2025 · best of 5 1:52
Sandbag lunges 2:48 Manchester 2026 · best of 5 3:47
Wall balls 3:50 Manchester 2025 · best of 5 4:22
Runs (8 km) 45:49 Birmingham 2025 · best of 5 49:17
Roxzone 5:37 Glasgow 2025 · best of 5 7:46
How to read

Each station's best across Emily's Doubles Women races, from different races, against the typical Doubles Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

2 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Doubles Women race

Glasgow 2025, against 1,847 Doubles Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Emilyedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Emily sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Runs (faster than 73% of the field), weakest on BBJ (faster than 37%).

See the numbers
Part Emily: faster than
Ski 61%
Push 44%
Pull 45%
BBJ 37%
Row 43%
Carry 71%
Lunges 39%
Wall balls 64%
Roxzone 52%
Runs 73%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 61%
Sled push faster than 44%
Sled pull faster than 45%
Burpee broad jump faster than 37%
Row faster than 43%
Farmers carry faster than 71%
Sandbag lunges faster than 39%
Wall balls faster than 64%
Roxzone faster than 52%
Runs (8 km) faster than 73%

How much of the field Emily beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (faster than 73%); weakest: Burpee broad jump (faster than 37%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:04 faster
Sled push 0:03 slower
Sled pull 0:05 slower
Burpee broad jump 0:25 slower
Row 0:04 slower
Farmers carry 0:08 faster
Sandbag lunges 0:16 slower
Wall balls 0:10 faster
Roxzone 0:05 faster
Runs (8 km) 4:14 faster

Emily's time on each part against the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (4:14 faster); weakest: Burpee broad jump (0:25 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Emily against the typical Doubles Women finisher

Emily1:22:17
4:204:345:471:505:554:006:044:406:195:146:411:416:323:585:064:085:37
Typical Doubles Women1:25:33
4:414:386:221:476:393:556:424:156:525:106:471:496:503:425:244:185:42
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Emily: 46:44 running, 30:05 at the stations and 5:37 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:14).Below, Typical Doubles Women: 50:18 running, 29:34 at the stations and 5:42 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:10) and the shortest the sled push (1:47).

See the numbers
Part Emily Typical Doubles Women
Run 1 4:20 4:41
SkiErg 4:34 4:38
Run 2 5:47 6:22
Sled push 1:50 1:47
Run 3 5:55 6:39
Sled pull 4:00 3:55
Run 4 6:04 6:42
Burpee broad jump 4:40 4:15
Run 5 6:19 6:52
Row 5:14 5:10
Run 6 6:41 6:47
Farmers carry 1:41 1:49
Run 7 6:32 6:50
Sandbag lunges 3:58 3:42
Run 8 5:06 5:24
Wall balls 4:08 4:18
Roxzone 5:37 5:42
Finish 1:22:17 1:26:33

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Burpee broad jump cost 0:25 against the typical Doubles Women finisher at Glasgow 2025. The burpee broad jump guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix burpee broad jump. Then beat 1:22:17.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report