Athlete · Doubles Women · team 45-49 · GBR GBR

Amy Galvin

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/amy-galvin-t-56d65a

4 HYROX races over 2 seasons, all in a team with 3 partners.

Best Doubles Women time1:16:59London 2024
Best Doubles Women place397thof 1,668 · London 2024
Latest race1:27:29London ExCeL 2025 · Doubles Women with Elizabeth Black10:30 slower than Amy's best Doubles Women time (1:16:59)
Strongest part of the raceRuns (8 km)faster than 79% of Doubles Women at London 2024
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:18:001:20:001:22:001:24:001:26:00 best 1:16:59 best 1:16:59 · London

This line shows the finish time of Amy Galvin at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:16:59 at London (Dec 2024); Amy Galvin was 10:30 slower at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
London Dec 2024 Doubles Women 1:16:59
London May 2025 Doubles Women 1:27:02
London ExCeL Dec 2025 Doubles Women 1:27:29

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

4 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Women, team 45-49, with Elizabeth Black 1:27:29 2139th of 3,491; 163rd of 292 aged 45-49 41:37* 30:54* 15:02 Runs 41:37 · Stations 30:54 · Roxzone 15:02

2,139th of 3,491 Doubles Women (faster than 38%). Against the 111 who finished around 1:27:09: most time gained on burpee broad jump (0:24), most lost on the roxzone (1:08). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:26 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 3:15 more).

Amy Galvin at HYROX London ExCeL 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 3,491 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,491 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:13 4:02 faster than 37%
SkiErg: 5:14 5:07 faster than 37%
Run 2: 4:55 4:37 faster than 32%
Sled push: 2:05 1:51 faster than 23%
Run 3: 4:56 4:45 faster than 40%
Sled pull: 4:03 4:13 faster than 59%
Run 4: 5:03 4:51 faster than 38%
Burpee broad jump: 4:14 4:23 faster than 56%
Run 5: 5:08 4:54 faster than 38%
Row: 5:11 5:19 faster than 64%
Run 6: 5:08 4:53 faster than 36%
Farmers carry: 1:51 1:49 faster than 45%
Run 7: 5:07 4:54 faster than 38%
Sandbag lunges: 3:44 3:41 faster than 48%
Run 8: 7:10 6:42 faster than 34%
Wall balls: 4:32 4:27 faster than 46%
Roxzone: 15:02 13:21 faster than 25%
Runs (8 km) 41:37 39:40 faster than 37%
Stations (8) 30:54
Finish 1:27:29 1:24:12 2139th of 3,491 · faster than 38%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 40-49, with Kate Narbrough 1:27:02 685th of 1,118; 143rd of 261 aged 40-49 53:46 27:31 5:48 Runs 53:46 · Stations 27:31 · Roxzone 5:48

685th of 1,118 Doubles Women (faster than 38%). Against the 33 who finished around 1:26:40: most time gained on burpee broad jump (1:25), most lost on the eight runs (4:44). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:24 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:24 more).

Amy Galvin at HYROX London 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,118 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,118 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:06 5:43 faster than 80%
SkiErg: 4:46 4:35 faster than 28%
Run 2: 4:54 5:29 faster than 82%
Sled push: 1:45 1:48 faster than 59%
Run 3: 10:09 5:40 faster than 0%
Sled pull: 3:34 3:54 faster than 70%
Run 4: 5:04 5:42 faster than 81%
Burpee broad jump: 3:12 4:13 faster than 89%
Run 5: 5:23 5:47 faster than 71%
Row: 5:11 5:05 faster than 40%
Run 6: 5:19 5:46 faster than 73%
Farmers carry: 1:53 1:49 faster than 40%
Run 7: 5:06 5:48 faster than 83%
Sandbag lunges: 3:05 3:42 faster than 84%
Run 8: 12:49 7:51 faster than 2%
Wall balls: 4:05 4:20 faster than 67%
Roxzone: 5:48 5:56 faster than 54%
Runs (8 km) 53:46 47:57 faster than 22%
Stations (8) 27:31
Finish 1:27:02 1:23:57 685th of 1,118 · faster than 38%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 40-49, with Kate Narbrough 1:16:59 397th of 1,668; 60th of 387 aged 40-49 41:23 28:15 7:26 Runs 41:23 · Stations 28:15 · Roxzone 7:26

397th of 1,668 Doubles Women (faster than 76%). Against the 50 who finished around 1:17:24: most time gained on the eight runs (0:40), most lost on SkiErg (0:16). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:06 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:45 less).

Amy Galvin at HYROX London 2024, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,668 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,668 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:37 7:10 faster than 71%
SkiErg: 4:48 4:39 faster than 31%
Run 2: 4:44 5:15 faster than 78%
Sled push: 1:43 1:54 faster than 77%
Run 3: 4:54 5:26 faster than 78%
Sled pull: 3:53 4:12 faster than 68%
Run 4: 5:01 5:30 faster than 75%
Burpee broad jump: 3:40 4:15 faster than 73%
Run 5: 5:00 5:36 faster than 79%
Row: 5:04 5:07 faster than 56%
Run 6: 5:03 5:34 faster than 77%
Farmers carry: 1:48 1:46 faster than 47%
Run 7: 4:47 5:34 faster than 86%
Sandbag lunges: 3:05 3:33 faster than 76%
Run 8: 5:20 6:01 faster than 79%
Wall balls: 4:14 4:21 faster than 57%
Roxzone: 7:26 8:09 faster than 66%
Runs (8 km) 41:23 46:15 faster than 79%
Stations (8) 28:15
Finish 1:16:59 1:24:23 397th of 1,668 · faster than 76%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Mixed, team 40-49, with Paul Galvin 1:38:57 1232nd of 1,389; 273rd of 320 aged 40-49 50:02 37:33 11:26 Runs 50:02 · Stations 37:33 · Roxzone 11:26

1,232nd of 1,389 Doubles Mixed (faster than 11%). Against the 42 who finished around 1:40:07: most time gained on the eight runs (3:40), most lost on wall balls (1:12). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:59 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:10 more).

Amy Galvin at HYROX Birmingham 2024, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 1,389 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,389 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 6:22 6:05 faster than 35%
SkiErg: 4:36 4:13 faster than 11%
Run 2: 5:39 5:10 faster than 25%
Sled push: 2:17 2:03 faster than 25%
Run 3: 5:56 5:23 faster than 25%
Sled pull: 5:21 3:55 faster than 6%
Run 4: 6:07 5:26 faster than 22%
Burpee broad jump: 5:18 3:39 faster than 10%
Run 5: 6:29 5:33 faster than 18%
Row: 5:00 4:39 faster than 20%
Run 6: 6:19 5:28 faster than 18%
Farmers carry: 2:02 1:45 faster than 16%
Run 7: 6:33 5:29 faster than 15%
Sandbag lunges: 6:02 3:50 faster than 4%
Run 8: 6:42 5:42 faster than 19%
Wall balls: 6:57 4:27 faster than 6%
Roxzone: 11:26 7:28 faster than 6%
Runs (8 km) 50:02 44:21 faster than 21%
Stations (8) 37:33
Finish 1:38:57 1:20:32 1232nd of 1,389 · faster than 11%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Doubles Women

The fastest Amy has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:46 London 2025 · best of 3 4:49
Sled push 1:43 London 2024 · best of 3 1:52
Sled pull 3:34 London 2025 · best of 3 4:13
Burpee broad jump 3:12 London 2025 · best of 3 4:18
Row 5:04 London 2024 · best of 3 5:13
Farmers carry 1:48 London 2024 · best of 3 1:52
Sandbag lunges 3:05 London 2025 · best of 3 3:47
Wall balls 4:05 London 2025 · best of 3 4:22
Runs (8 km) 41:23 London 2024 · best of 3 49:17
Roxzone 5:48 London 2025 · best of 3 7:46
How to read

Each station's best across Amy's Doubles Women races, from different races, against the typical Doubles Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

3 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Doubles Women race

London 2024, against 1,668 Doubles Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Amyedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Amy sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Runs (faster than 79% of the field), weakest on Ski (faster than 32%).

See the numbers
Part Amy: faster than
Ski 32%
Push 77%
Pull 69%
BBJ 73%
Row 56%
Carry 48%
Lunges 77%
Wall balls 58%
Roxzone 67%
Runs 79%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 32%
Sled push faster than 77%
Sled pull faster than 69%
Burpee broad jump faster than 73%
Row faster than 56%
Farmers carry faster than 48%
Sandbag lunges faster than 77%
Wall balls faster than 58%
Roxzone faster than 67%
Runs (8 km) faster than 79%

How much of the field Amy beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (faster than 79%); weakest: SkiErg (faster than 32%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:09 slower
Sled push 0:11 faster
Sled pull 0:19 faster
Burpee broad jump 0:35 faster
Row 0:03 faster
Farmers carry 0:02 slower
Sandbag lunges 0:28 faster
Wall balls 0:07 faster
Roxzone 0:43 faster
Runs (8 km) 4:52 faster

Amy's time on each part against the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (4:52 faster); weakest: SkiErg (0:09 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Amy against the typical Doubles Women finisher

Amy1:16:59
6:374:484:441:434:543:535:013:405:005:045:031:484:473:055:204:147:26
Typical Doubles Women1:24:02
7:104:395:151:545:264:125:304:155:365:075:341:465:343:336:014:218:09
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Amy: 41:26 running, 28:15 at the stations and 7:26 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:04) and the shortest the sled push (1:43).Below, Typical Doubles Women: 46:06 running, 29:47 at the stations and 8:09 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:07).

See the numbers
Part Amy Typical Doubles Women
Run 1 6:37 7:10
SkiErg 4:48 4:39
Run 2 4:44 5:15
Sled push 1:43 1:54
Run 3 4:54 5:26
Sled pull 3:53 4:12
Run 4 5:01 5:30
Burpee broad jump 3:40 4:15
Run 5 5:00 5:36
Row 5:04 5:07
Run 6 5:03 5:34
Farmers carry 1:48 1:46
Run 7 4:47 5:34
Sandbag lunges 3:05 3:33
Run 8 5:20 6:01
Wall balls 4:14 4:21
Roxzone 7:26 8:09
Finish 1:16:59 1:24:23

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Training for the next one? Let's beat 1:16:59.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report