Athlete · Open Women · 25-29 · GBR GBR

Meg Aston

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/meg-aston-608d46c6

4 HYROX races over 1 season: 1 solo, 3 in a team with 1 partner.

Open Women time1:44:43Manchester 2026
Open Women place960thof 1,356 · Manchester 2026
Latest race1:20:21Copenhagen 2026 · Doubles Women with Charlotte Hubble1:32 slower than Meg's best Doubles Women time (1:18:49)
Strongest part of the raceRoxzonefaster than 44% of Open Women at Manchester 2026
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:19:001:20:001:21:00 best 1:18:49 best 1:18:49 · London ExCeL

This line shows the finish time of Meg Aston at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:18:49 at London ExCeL (Dec 2025); Meg Aston was 0:55 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Birmingham Oct 2025 Doubles Women 1:21:16
London ExCeL Dec 2025 Doubles Women 1:18:49
Copenhagen Mar 2026 Doubles Women 1:20:21

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

4 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Charlotte Hubble 1:20:21 375th of 1,058; 111th of 263 aged 25-29 45:34 28:34 6:17 Runs 45:34 · Stations 28:34 · Roxzone 6:17

375th of 1,058 Doubles Women (faster than 64%). Against the 31 who finished around 1:20:16: most time gained on wall balls (0:22), most lost on burpee broad jump (0:46). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:58 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:24 less).

Meg Aston at HYROX Copenhagen 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,058 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,058 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 8:32 8:35 faster than 51%
SkiErg: 4:47 4:44 faster than 44%
Run 2: 4:49 5:19 faster than 77%
Sled push: 1:54 1:52 faster than 47%
Run 3: 5:13 5:34 faster than 68%
Sled pull: 3:36 3:54 faster than 66%
Run 4: 5:14 5:35 faster than 68%
Burpee broad jump: 4:22 4:01 faster than 37%
Run 5: 5:23 5:40 faster than 66%
Row: 5:01 5:00 faster than 49%
Run 6: 5:22 5:37 faster than 64%
Farmers carry: 1:53 1:48 faster than 40%
Run 7: 5:25 5:36 faster than 59%
Sandbag lunges: 3:11 3:29 faster than 69%
Run 8: 5:40 5:46 faster than 54%
Wall balls: 3:50 4:16 faster than 80%
Roxzone: 6:17 7:06 faster than 71%
Runs (8 km) 45:34 47:48 faster than 64%
Stations (8) 28:34
Finish 1:20:21 1:24:14 375th of 1,058 · faster than 64%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 25-29 1:44:43 960th of 1,356; 195th of 278 aged 25-29 52:42 45:39 6:28 Runs 52:42 · Stations 45:39 · Roxzone 6:28

960th of 1,356 Open Women (faster than 29%). Against the 41 who finished around 1:44:23: most time gained on burpee broad jump (0:56), most lost on the eight runs (1:21). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:07 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:05 more).

Meg Aston at HYROX Manchester 2026, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,356 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,356 Open Women here
Run 1: 4:34 4:13 faster than 32%
SkiErg: 5:10 5:07 faster than 43%
Run 2: 6:31 5:56 faster than 30%
Sled push: 3:00 2:39 faster than 26%
Run 3: 6:52 6:18 faster than 31%
Sled pull: 6:38 5:28 faster than 20%
Run 4: 6:52 6:20 faster than 32%
Burpee broad jump: 7:35 6:43 faster than 37%
Run 5: 7:06 6:29 faster than 31%
Row: 5:29 5:24 faster than 43%
Run 6: 6:54 6:22 faster than 32%
Farmers carry: 2:41 2:18 faster than 23%
Run 7: 7:19 6:18 faster than 21%
Sandbag lunges: 6:57 5:17 faster than 17%
Run 8: 6:38 5:20 faster than 21%
Wall balls: 8:09 6:41 faster than 28%
Roxzone: 6:28 6:08 faster than 44%
Runs (8 km) 52:42 47:39 faster than 29%
Stations (8) 45:39
Finish 1:44:43 1:34:09 960th of 1,356 · faster than 29%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Charlotte Hubble 1:18:49 1076th of 3,491; 311th of 794 aged 25-29 37:52* 28:47* 12:15 Runs 37:52 · Stations 28:47 · Roxzone 12:15

1,076th of 3,491 Doubles Women (faster than 69%). Against the 106 who finished around 1:18:37: most time gained on sled pull (0:13), most lost on the eight runs (0:38). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:11 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:56 more).

Meg Aston at HYROX London ExCeL 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 3,491 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,491 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 3:53 4:02 faster than 59%
SkiErg: 4:54 5:07 faster than 75%
Run 2: 4:23 4:37 faster than 64%
Sled push: 1:51 1:51 faster than 51%
Run 3: 4:32 4:45 faster than 64%
Sled pull: 3:42 4:13 faster than 79%
Run 4: 4:35 4:51 faster than 64%
Burpee broad jump: 4:00 4:23 faster than 64%
Run 5: 4:44 4:54 faster than 60%
Row: 5:02 5:19 faster than 79%
Run 6: 4:41 4:53 faster than 62%
Farmers carry: 1:45 1:49 faster than 61%
Run 7: 4:43 4:54 faster than 60%
Sandbag lunges: 3:28 3:41 faster than 62%
Run 8: 6:25 6:42 faster than 62%
Wall balls: 4:05 4:27 faster than 73%
Roxzone: 12:15 13:21 faster than 70%
Runs (8 km) 37:52 39:40 faster than 63%
Stations (8) 28:47
Finish 1:18:49 1:24:12 1076th of 3,491 · faster than 69%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Charlotte Hubble 1:21:16 848th of 2,427; 216th of 548 aged 25-29 45:15 29:26 6:40 Runs 45:15 · Stations 29:26 · Roxzone 6:40

848th of 2,427 Doubles Women (faster than 65%). Against the 73 who finished around 1:21:17: most time gained on wall balls (0:19), most lost on burpee broad jump (0:30). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:04 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:12 less).

Meg Aston at HYROX Birmingham 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,427 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,427 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:55 6:34 faster than 76%
SkiErg: 4:35 4:45 faster than 72%
Run 2: 5:19 5:35 faster than 63%
Sled push: 2:01 1:56 faster than 41%
Run 3: 5:26 5:49 faster than 69%
Sled pull: 3:53 4:20 faster than 77%
Run 4: 5:27 5:54 faster than 71%
Burpee broad jump: 4:27 4:14 faster than 41%
Run 5: 5:44 5:59 faster than 61%
Row: 5:10 5:11 faster than 51%
Run 6: 5:36 5:53 faster than 63%
Farmers carry: 1:53 1:51 faster than 47%
Run 7: 5:56 5:53 faster than 48%
Sandbag lunges: 3:33 3:38 faster than 55%
Run 8: 5:55 5:54 faster than 49%
Wall balls: 3:54 4:23 faster than 81%
Roxzone: 6:40 7:03 faster than 62%
Runs (8 km) 45:15 47:38 faster than 64%
Stations (8) 29:26
Finish 1:21:16 1:25:22 848th of 2,427 · faster than 65%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Raced with

1 team partner

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Women race

Manchester 2026, against 1,356 Open Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Megedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Meg sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Roxzone (faster than 44% of the field), weakest on Lunges (faster than 18%).

See the numbers
Part Meg: faster than
Ski 44%
Push 27%
Pull 21%
BBJ 37%
Row 43%
Carry 24%
Lunges 18%
Wall balls 29%
Roxzone 44%
Runs 29%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 44%
Sled push faster than 27%
Sled pull faster than 21%
Burpee broad jump faster than 37%
Row faster than 43%
Farmers carry faster than 24%
Sandbag lunges faster than 18%
Wall balls faster than 29%
Roxzone faster than 44%
Runs (8 km) faster than 29%

How much of the field Meg beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Roxzone (faster than 44%); weakest: Sandbag lunges (faster than 18%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:03 slower
Sled push 0:21 slower
Sled pull 1:10 slower
Burpee broad jump 0:52 slower
Row 0:05 slower
Farmers carry 0:23 slower
Sandbag lunges 1:40 slower
Wall balls 1:28 slower
Roxzone 0:20 slower
Runs (8 km) 5:03 slower

Meg's time on each part against the typical Open Women finisher at this race.Best: SkiErg (0:03 slower); weakest: Runs (8 km) (5:03 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Meg against the typical Open Women finisher

Meg1:44:43
4:345:106:313:006:526:386:527:357:065:296:542:417:196:576:388:096:28
Typical Open Women1:33:01
4:135:075:562:396:185:286:206:436:295:246:222:186:185:175:206:416:08
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Meg: 52:47 running, 45:38 at the stations and 6:28 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (8:09).Below, Typical Open Women: 47:15 running, 39:37 at the stations and 6:08 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (6:43).

See the numbers
Part Meg Typical Open Women
Run 1 4:34 4:13
SkiErg 5:10 5:07
Run 2 6:31 5:56
Sled push 3:00 2:39
Run 3 6:52 6:18
Sled pull 6:38 5:28
Run 4 6:52 6:20
Burpee broad jump 7:35 6:43
Run 5 7:06 6:29
Row 5:29 5:24
Run 6 6:54 6:22
Farmers carry 2:41 2:18
Run 7 7:19 6:18
Sandbag lunges 6:57 5:17
Run 8 6:38 5:20
Wall balls 8:09 6:41
Roxzone 6:28 6:08
Finish 1:44:43 1:34:09

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Sandbag lunges cost 1:40 against the typical Open Women finisher at Manchester 2026. The sandbag lunges guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix sandbag lunges. Then beat 1:44:43.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report