Athlete · Pro Women · 35-39 · NED NED

Marloes Oomen

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/marloes-oomen-7ccfee08

6 HYROX races over 2 seasons: 2 solo, 4 in a team with 3 partners. 1 podium finish, 1 age-group win.

Best Pro Women time1:07:33Maastricht Feb 2025
Best Pro Women place10thof 69 · Maastricht Feb 2025
Latest race1:04:39Mechelen 2026 · Doubles Mixed with Mitchel Van Hoof0:42 slower than Marloes's best Doubles Mixed time (1:03:57)
Strongest part of the raceSandbag lungesfaster than 99% of Pro Women at Maastricht Feb 2025
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Finish time, race by race: one race type at a time

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:08:001:10:001:12:001:14:00 best 1:07:33

This line shows the finish time of Marloes Oomen at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:07:33 at Maastricht (Feb 2025); Marloes Oomen was 8:10 slower at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Maastricht Feb 2025 Pro Women 1:07:33
Maastricht Sep 2025 Pro Women 1:15:43

Each dot is one Pro Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Pro Women races yet to measure the change.

Every race

6 results at 6 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Mixed, team 35-39, with Mitchel Van Hoof 1:04:39 130th of 1,780; 22nd of 352 aged 35-39 35:32 23:07 6:04 Runs 35:32 · Stations 23:07 · Roxzone 6:04

130th of 1,780 Doubles Mixed (faster than 92%). Against the 54 who finished around 1:02:40: most time gained on sled pull (0:31), most lost on the eight runs (2:41). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:24 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:32 more).

Marloes Oomen at HYROX Mechelen 2026, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 1,780 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,780 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 3:25 4:12 faster than 88%
SkiErg: 3:52 4:15 faster than 93%
Run 2: 4:05 5:10 faster than 92%
Sled push: 1:39 1:58 faster than 88%
Run 3: 4:41 5:24 faster than 81%
Sled pull: 2:25 3:34 faster than 98%
Run 4: 4:24 5:26 faster than 89%
Burpee broad jump: 2:53 3:42 faster than 85%
Run 5: 4:35 5:33 faster than 87%
Row: 4:09 4:40 faster than 95%
Run 6: 4:35 5:30 faster than 86%
Farmers carry: 1:33 1:48 faster than 85%
Run 7: 4:48 5:27 faster than 78%
Sandbag lunges: 3:02 3:57 faster than 88%
Run 8: 5:02 5:52 faster than 81%
Wall balls: 3:34 4:30 faster than 96%
Roxzone: 6:04 8:03 faster than 93%
Runs (8 km) 35:32 42:36 faster than 86%
Stations (8) 23:07
Finish 1:04:39 1:19:26 130th of 1,780 · faster than 92%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Ghent 2025 12 Dec 2025
Race results
Doubles Mixed, team 35-39, with Joppe Ellenbroek 1:03:57 58th of 1,085; 11th of 224 aged 35-39 35:25 23:37 4:59 Runs 35:25 · Stations 23:37 · Roxzone 4:59

58th of 1,085 Doubles Mixed (faster than 94%). Against the 33 who finished around 1:03:49: most time gained on sled pull (0:25), most lost on the eight runs (1:14). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:33 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:17 more).

Marloes Oomen at HYROX Ghent 2025, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 1,085 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,085 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 4:29 5:35 faster than 90%
SkiErg: 4:06 4:19 faster than 81%
Run 2: 4:14 5:11 faster than 89%
Sled push: 1:46 2:12 faster than 94%
Run 3: 4:24 5:30 faster than 91%
Sled pull: 2:49 4:10 faster than 98%
Run 4: 4:21 5:30 faster than 92%
Burpee broad jump: 2:34 3:37 faster than 92%
Run 5: 4:25 5:38 faster than 92%
Row: 4:21 4:42 faster than 86%
Run 6: 4:33 5:31 faster than 87%
Farmers carry: 1:38 1:46 faster than 69%
Run 7: 4:25 5:31 faster than 91%
Sandbag lunges: 2:43 3:51 faster than 95%
Run 8: 4:37 5:37 faster than 87%
Wall balls: 3:40 4:37 faster than 95%
Roxzone: 4:59 6:42 faster than 92%
Runs (8 km) 35:25 44:18 faster than 91%
Stations (8) 23:37
Finish 1:03:57 1:20:52 58th of 1,085 · faster than 94%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Women, 35-39 1:15:43 33rd of 160; 8th of 30 aged 35-39 36:26 33:09 6:14 Runs 36:26 · Stations 33:09 · Roxzone 6:14

33rd of 160 Pro Women (faster than 79%).

Marloes Oomen at HYROX Maastricht Sep 2025, Pro Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Women at this race, and the share of the 160 Pro Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 160 Pro Women here
Run 1: 4:23 4:41 faster than 63%
SkiErg: 4:40 4:45 faster than 66%
Run 2: 4:10 4:39 faster than 76%
Sled push: 2:31 3:30 faster than 96%
Run 3: 4:22 5:00 faster than 75%
Sled pull: 5:07 6:34 faster than 84%
Run 4: 4:28 5:06 faster than 74%
Burpee broad jump: 5:05 5:42 faster than 62%
Run 5: 4:34 5:17 faster than 74%
Row: 5:12 5:03 faster than 38%
Run 6: 4:35 5:07 faster than 69%
Farmers carry: 2:09 2:35 faster than 72%
Run 7: 4:45 5:10 faster than 67%
Sandbag lunges: 4:01 5:23 faster than 89%
Run 8: 5:13 5:46 faster than 66%
Wall balls: 4:24 6:53 faster than 93%
Roxzone: 6:14 7:03 faster than 66%
Runs (8 km) 36:26 40:54 faster than 72%
Stations (8) 33:09
Finish 1:15:43 1:30:41 33rd of 160 · faster than 79%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 30-39, with Jana Bekkers 1:02:44 2nd of 1,149; 1st of 441 aged 30-39 36:35 22:18 3:55 Runs 36:35 · Stations 22:18 · Roxzone 3:55

2nd of 1,149 Doubles Women (the fastest).

Marloes Oomen at HYROX Rotterdam 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,149 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,149 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:13 6:21 fastest in the field
SkiErg: 4:14 4:36 faster than 92%
Run 2: 4:24 5:55 faster than 98%
Sled push: 1:31 1:39 faster than 71%
Run 3: 4:29 6:10 faster than 99%
Sled pull: 3:14 4:00 faster than 92%
Run 4: 4:40 6:14 faster than 98%
Burpee broad jump: 2:32 4:17 faster than 99%
Run 5: 4:44 6:24 faster than 98%
Row: 4:23 5:02 faster than 99%
Run 6: 4:40 6:15 faster than 98%
Farmers carry: 1:21 1:50 faster than 97%
Run 7: 4:45 6:14 faster than 98%
Sandbag lunges: 2:01 3:28 fastest in the field
Run 8: 4:43 6:40 fastest in the field
Wall balls: 3:02 3:51 fastest in the field
Roxzone: 3:55 6:58 fastest in the field
Runs (8 km) 36:35 50:18 faster than 99%
Stations (8) 22:18
Finish 1:02:44 1:26:22 2nd of 1,149 · fastest in the field

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Women, 35-39 1:07:33 10th of 69; 2nd of 14 aged 35-39 30:05* 28:15* 4:34 Runs 30:05 · Stations 28:15 · Roxzone 4:34

10th of 69 Pro Women (faster than 86%).

Marloes Oomen at HYROX Maastricht Feb 2025, Pro Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Women at this race, and the share of the 69 Pro Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 69 Pro Women here
Run 1: 5:24 6:16 faster than 81%
SkiErg: 4:21 4:42 faster than 89%
Run 2: 3:57 4:33 faster than 80%
Sled push: 2:03 3:15 faster than 97%
Run 3: 4:09 4:48 faster than 74%
Sled pull: 4:45 4:58 faster than 58%
Run 4: 4:09 4:48 faster than 78%
Burpee broad jump: 3:43 5:02 faster than 88%
Run 5: —
Row: 4:43 5:16 faster than 88%
Run 6: 4:07 4:52 faster than 81%
Farmers carry: 1:47 2:19 faster than 88%
Run 7: 4:10 4:53 faster than 81%
Sandbag lunges: 3:10 4:59 faster than 98%
Run 8: 4:07 5:00 faster than 82%
Wall balls: 3:43 5:53 faster than 92%
Roxzone: 4:34 6:21 faster than 86%
Runs (8 km) 30:05 35:36 faster than 81%
Stations (8) 28:15
Finish 1:07:33 1:27:18 10th of 69 · faster than 86%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 30-39, with Jana Bekkers 1:03:47 4th of 965; 2nd of 361 aged 30-39 37:10 22:29 4:13 Runs 37:10 · Stations 22:29 · Roxzone 4:13

4th of 965 Doubles Women (the fastest).

Marloes Oomen at HYROX Amsterdam 2024, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 965 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 965 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 3:13 4:36 faster than 98%
SkiErg: 4:10 4:38 faster than 96%
Run 2: 4:46 6:22 faster than 98%
Sled push: 1:14 1:32 faster than 96%
Run 3: 4:46 6:32 fastest in the field
Sled pull: 2:43 3:43 faster than 97%
Run 4: 4:48 6:38 fastest in the field
Burpee broad jump: 2:58 4:14 faster than 94%
Run 5: 4:49 6:47 faster than 99%
Row: 4:28 5:04 faster than 97%
Run 6: 4:49 6:44 faster than 99%
Farmers carry: 1:19 1:46 faster than 96%
Run 7: 4:54 6:45 faster than 98%
Sandbag lunges: 2:21 3:29 fastest in the field
Run 8: 5:09 7:10 faster than 98%
Wall balls: 3:16 3:56 faster than 98%
Roxzone: 4:13 6:36 faster than 99%
Runs (8 km) 37:10 51:55 faster than 99%
Stations (8) 22:29
Finish 1:03:47 1:27:54 4th of 965 · fastest in the field

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Pro Women

The fastest Marloes has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:21 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 2 4:53
Sled push 2:03 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 2 3:56
Sled pull 4:45 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 2 5:49
Burpee broad jump 3:43 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 2 5:12
Row 4:43 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 2 5:07
Farmers carry 1:47 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 2 2:36
Sandbag lunges 3:10 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 2 5:10
Wall balls 3:43 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 2 6:18
Runs (8 km) 30:05 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 2 40:26
Roxzone 4:34 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 2 6:34
How to read

Each station's best across Marloes's Pro Women races, from different races, against the typical Pro Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

3 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Pro Women race

Maastricht Feb 2025, against 69 Pro Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Marloesedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Marloes sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Lunges (faster than 99% of the field), weakest on Pull (faster than 58%).

See the numbers
Part Marloes: faster than
Ski 90%
Push 97%
Pull 58%
BBJ 88%
Row 88%
Carry 88%
Lunges 99%
Wall balls 93%
Roxzone 86%
Runs 82%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 90%
Sled push faster than 97%
Sled pull faster than 58%
Burpee broad jump faster than 88%
Row faster than 88%
Farmers carry faster than 88%
Sandbag lunges faster than 99%
Wall balls faster than 93%
Roxzone faster than 86%
Runs (8 km) faster than 82%

How much of the field Marloes beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Sandbag lunges (faster than 99%); weakest: Sled pull (faster than 58%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:21 faster
Sled push 1:12 faster
Sled pull 0:13 faster
Burpee broad jump 1:19 faster
Row 0:33 faster
Farmers carry 0:32 faster
Sandbag lunges 1:49 faster
Wall balls 2:10 faster
Roxzone 1:47 faster
Runs (8 km) 5:31 faster

Marloes's time on each part against the typical Pro Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (5:31 faster); weakest: Sled pull (0:13 faster).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Pro Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Marloes against the typical Pro Women finisher

Marloes1:07:33
5:244:213:572:034:094:454:093:434:434:071:474:103:104:073:434:34
Typical Pro Women1:17:55
6:164:424:333:154:484:584:485:025:164:522:194:534:595:005:536:21
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)Hatched: no split for run 5 at this race, so the bar is shorter than the finish.

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Marloes: 30:04 running, 28:16 at the stations and 4:34 in the roxzone; the longest station was the sled pull (4:45).Below, Typical Pro Women: 35:10 running, 36:24 at the stations and 6:21 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (5:53).

See the numbers
Part Marloes Typical Pro Women
Run 1 5:24 6:16
SkiErg 4:21 4:42
Run 2 3:57 4:33
Sled push 2:03 3:15
Run 3 4:09 4:48
Sled pull 4:45 4:58
Run 4 4:09 4:48
Burpee broad jump 3:43 5:02
Run 5 — —
Row 4:43 5:16
Run 6 4:07 4:52
Farmers carry 1:47 2:19
Run 7 4:10 4:53
Sandbag lunges 3:10 4:59
Run 8 4:07 5:00
Wall balls 3:43 5:53
Roxzone 4:34 6:21
Finish 1:07:33 1:27:18

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Training for the next one? Let's beat 1:07:33.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report