Athlete · Doubles Women · team 40-44 · PHI PHI

Hazel Cagaanan

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/hazel-cagaanan-t-9264a2

4 HYROX races over 2 seasons, all in a team with 4 partners. Best Doubles Women time: 1:15:23 at Cardiff 2026.

Best Doubles Women time1:15:23Cardiff 2026
Best Doubles Women place414thof 2,444 · Cardiff 2026
Latest race1:15:23Cardiff 2026 · Doubles Women with Charlie DuffellHazel's best Doubles Women time so far
Strongest part of the raceWall ballsfaster than 95% of Doubles Women at Cardiff 2026

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:16:001:20:001:24:001:28:001:32:00 best 1:15:23

This line shows the finish time of Hazel Cagaanan at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:15:23 at Cardiff (Apr 2026); Hazel Cagaanan was 17:41 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Cardiff May 2025 Doubles Women 1:33:04
London ExCeL Dec 2025 Doubles Women 1:33:13
Manchester Jan 2026 Doubles Women 1:20:26
Cardiff Apr 2026 Doubles Women 1:15:23

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

4 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Women, team 40-44, with Charlie Duffell 1:15:23 414th of 2,444; 56th of 352 aged 40-44 44:22 27:30 3:31† Runs 44:22 · Stations 27:30 · Roxzone 3:31

414th of 2,444 Doubles Women (faster than 83%). Against the 75 who finished around 1:14:54: most time gained on burpee broad jump (0:29), most lost on the eight runs (1:13). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:44 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:51 more).

Hazel Cagaanan at HYROX Cardiff 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,444 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,444 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:44 6:21 faster than 77%
SkiErg: 4:42 4:50 faster than 69%
Run 2: 5:19 5:47 faster than 74%
Sled push: 1:52 1:52 faster than 51%
Run 3: 5:24 6:03 faster than 79%
Sled pull: 3:36 3:55 faster than 71%
Run 4: 5:24 6:05 faster than 79%
Burpee broad jump: 3:24 4:41 faster than 93%
Run 5: 5:24 6:11 faster than 82%
Row: 4:54 5:13 faster than 83%
Run 6: 5:45 6:27 faster than 78%
Farmers carry: 2:12 2:22 faster than 69%
Run 7: 5:10 5:47 faster than 78%
Sandbag lunges: 3:19 3:37 faster than 66%
Run 8: 6:16 6:59 faster than 76%
Wall balls: 3:31 4:20 faster than 95%
Roxzone †: 3:31
Runs (8 km) 44:22 49:56 faster than 80%
Stations (8) 27:30
Finish 1:15:23 1:25:36 414th of 2,444 · faster than 83%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 50-54, with Les Park 1:20:26 477th of 1,546; 3rd of 48 aged 50-54 45:43 29:56 4:51 Runs 45:43 · Stations 29:56 · Roxzone 4:51

477th of 1,546 Doubles Women (faster than 69%). Against the 46 who finished around 1:20:07: most time gained on the roxzone (0:18), most lost on SkiErg (0:18). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:04 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:24 more).

Hazel Cagaanan at HYROX Manchester 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,546 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,546 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:17 4:32 faster than 62%
SkiErg: 4:49 4:37 faster than 27%
Run 2: 5:57 6:17 faster than 63%
Sled push: 1:33 1:44 faster than 81%
Run 3: 6:04 6:33 faster than 68%
Sled pull: 3:52 4:03 faster than 60%
Run 4: 6:03 6:38 faster than 69%
Burpee broad jump: 4:25 4:28 faster than 52%
Run 5: 6:04 6:44 faster than 73%
Row: 5:03 5:07 faster than 58%
Run 6: 6:05 6:42 faster than 71%
Farmers carry: 1:51 1:54 faster than 57%
Run 7: 6:15 6:43 faster than 66%
Sandbag lunges: 3:50 3:49 faster than 49%
Run 8: 5:01 5:31 faster than 69%
Wall balls: 4:33 4:21 faster than 40%
Roxzone: 4:51 6:04 faster than 77%
Runs (8 km) 45:43 50:04 faster than 70%
Stations (8) 29:56
Finish 1:20:26 1:26:49 477th of 1,546 · faster than 69%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 30-34, with Naomi Chadd 1:33:13 2674th of 3,491; 584th of 744 aged 30-34 41:48* 37:44* 13:45 Runs 41:48 · Stations 37:44 · Roxzone 13:45

2,674th of 3,491 Doubles Women (faster than 23%). Against the 106 who finished around 1:32:30: most time gained on the eight runs (2:04), most lost on sled pull (1:14). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:02 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 3:52 more).

Hazel Cagaanan at HYROX London ExCeL 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 3,491 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,491 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 3:54 4:02 faster than 58%
SkiErg: 5:33 5:07 faster than 12%
Run 2: 6:03 4:37 faster than 4%
Sled push: 2:40 1:51 faster than 1%
Run 3: 4:36 4:45 faster than 59%
Sled pull: 5:50 4:13 faster than 4%
Run 4: 4:51 4:51 faster than 49%
Burpee broad jump: 4:55 4:23 faster than 32%
Run 5: 4:50 4:54 faster than 53%
Row: 5:40 5:19 faster than 21%
Run 6: 4:59 4:53 faster than 44%
Farmers carry: 2:21 1:49 faster than 2%
Run 7: 4:48 4:54 faster than 55%
Sandbag lunges: 5:21 3:41 faster than 5%
Run 8: 7:49 6:42 faster than 20%
Wall balls: 5:24 4:27 faster than 16%
Roxzone: 13:45 13:21 faster than 43%
Runs (8 km) 41:48 39:40 faster than 36%
Stations (8) 37:44
Finish 1:33:13 1:24:12 2674th of 3,491 · faster than 23%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 30-39, with Gemma Moran 1:33:04 622nd of 778; 246th of 313 aged 30-39 55:42 31:19 6:03† Runs 55:42 · Stations 31:19 · Roxzone 6:03

622nd of 778 Doubles Women (faster than 20%).

Hazel Cagaanan at HYROX Cardiff 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 778 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 778 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:35 5:55 faster than 21%
SkiErg: 5:04 4:49 faster than 19%
Run 2: 6:14 5:28 faster than 20%
Sled push: 1:44 1:41 faster than 44%
Run 3: 6:08 5:43 faster than 32%
Sled pull: 4:09 3:53 faster than 37%
Run 4: 6:12 5:44 faster than 31%
Burpee broad jump: 5:21 4:26 faster than 22%
Run 5: 6:24 5:49 faster than 28%
Row: 5:32 5:11 faster than 17%
Run 6: 6:31 5:47 faster than 23%
Farmers carry: 2:03 1:50 faster than 20%
Run 7: 7:45 5:49 faster than 6%
Sandbag lunges: 3:16 3:27 faster than 61%
Run 8: 9:53 6:42 faster than 3%
Wall balls: 4:10 4:04 faster than 45%
Roxzone †: 6:03
Runs (8 km) 55:42 47:06 faster than 15%
Stations (8) 31:19
Finish 1:33:04 1:22:09 622nd of 778 · faster than 20%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. † This venue did not time the roxzone: the figure is the finish minus runs and stations, and part of the walk is inside the run laps there, so it is shorter than at other venues. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Doubles Women

The fastest Hazel has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:42 Cardiff 2026 · best of 4 4:49
Sled push 1:33 Manchester 2026 · best of 4 1:52
Sled pull 3:36 Cardiff 2026 · best of 4 4:13
Burpee broad jump 3:24 Cardiff 2026 · best of 4 4:18
Row 4:54 Cardiff 2026 · best of 4 5:13
Farmers carry 1:51 Manchester 2026 · best of 4 1:52
Sandbag lunges 3:16 Cardiff 2025 · best of 4 3:47
Wall balls 3:31 Cardiff 2026 · best of 4 4:22
Runs (8 km) 41:48 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 4 49:17
Roxzone 4:51 Manchester 2026 · best of 2 7:46
How to read

Each station's best across Hazel's Doubles Women races, from different races, against the typical Doubles Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

4 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Doubles Women race

Cardiff 2026, against 2,444 Doubles Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Hazeledge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Hazel sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Wall balls (faster than 95% of the field), weakest on Push (faster than 51%).

See the numbers
Part Hazel: faster than
Ski 70%
Push 51%
Pull 71%
BBJ 93%
Row 83%
Carry 69%
Lunges 66%
Wall balls 95%
Roxzone 80%
Runs 80%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 70%
Sled push faster than 51%
Sled pull faster than 71%
Burpee broad jump faster than 93%
Row faster than 83%
Farmers carry faster than 69%
Sandbag lunges faster than 66%
Wall balls faster than 95%
Roxzone faster than 80%
Runs (8 km) faster than 80%

How much of the field Hazel beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Wall balls (faster than 95%); weakest: Sled push (faster than 51%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:08 faster
Sled push level
Sled pull 0:19 faster
Burpee broad jump 1:17 faster
Row 0:19 faster
Farmers carry 0:10 faster
Sandbag lunges 0:18 faster
Wall balls 0:49 faster
Roxzone 0:53 faster
Runs (8 km) 5:34 faster

Hazel's time on each part against the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (5:34 faster); weakest: Sled push (level).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Hazel against the typical Doubles Women finisher

Hazel1:15:23
5:444:425:191:525:243:365:243:245:244:545:452:125:103:196:163:313:31
Typical Doubles Women1:24:54
6:214:505:471:526:033:556:054:416:115:136:272:225:473:376:594:204:24
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Hazel: 44:26 running, 27:31 at the stations and 3:31 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (4:54) and the shortest the sled push (1:52).Below, Typical Doubles Women: 49:40 running, 30:50 at the stations and 4:24 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:13) and the shortest the sled push (1:52).

See the numbers
Part Hazel Typical Doubles Women
Run 1 5:44 6:21
SkiErg 4:42 4:50
Run 2 5:19 5:47
Sled push 1:52 1:52
Run 3 5:24 6:03
Sled pull 3:36 3:55
Run 4 5:24 6:05
Burpee broad jump 3:24 4:41
Run 5 5:24 6:11
Row 4:54 5:13
Run 6 5:45 6:27
Farmers carry 2:12 2:22
Run 7 5:10 5:47
Sandbag lunges 3:19 3:37
Run 8 6:16 6:59
Wall balls 3:31 4:20
Roxzone 3:31 4:24
Finish 1:15:23 1:25:36

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Training for the next one? Let's beat 1:15:23.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report