Athlete · Open Women · 16-24 · GBR GBR

Emma Horrobin

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/emma-horrobin-06c8035e

4 HYROX races over 2 seasons: 2 solo, 2 in a team with 1 partner.

Best Open Women time1:48:51London ExCeL 2025
Best Open Women place2403rdof 2,921 · London ExCeL 2025
Latest race1:21:45Manchester 2026 · Doubles Women with Sian McLeodEmma's best Doubles Women time so far
Strongest part of the raceSled pullfaster than 40% of Open Women at London ExCeL 2025
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Finish time, race by race: one race type at a time

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:50:001:54:001:58:002:02:00 best 1:48:51

This line shows the finish time of Emma Horrobin at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:48:51 at London ExCeL (Dec 2025); Emma Horrobin was 15:24 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Manchester Jan 2025 Open Women 2:04:15
London ExCeL Dec 2025 Open Women 1:48:51

Each dot is one Open Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Open Women races yet to measure the change.

Every race

4 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Women, team 16-24, with Sian McLeod 1:21:45 542nd of 1,546; 67th of 199 aged 16-24 48:37 28:18 4:54 Runs 48:37 · Stations 28:18 · Roxzone 4:54

542nd of 1,546 Doubles Women (faster than 64%). Against the 47 who finished around 1:21:44: most time gained on wall balls (0:27), most lost on the eight runs (1:35). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:09 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:14 more).

Emma Horrobin at HYROX Manchester 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,546 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,546 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:13 4:32 faster than 65%
SkiErg: 4:28 4:37 faster than 69%
Run 2: 6:07 6:17 faster than 57%
Sled push: 1:56 1:44 faster than 24%
Run 3: 6:27 6:33 faster than 54%
Sled pull: 3:29 4:03 faster than 83%
Run 4: 6:28 6:38 faster than 56%
Burpee broad jump: 4:29 4:28 faster than 49%
Run 5: 6:41 6:44 faster than 52%
Row: 4:56 5:07 faster than 71%
Run 6: 6:44 6:42 faster than 48%
Farmers carry: 1:49 1:54 faster than 61%
Run 7: 6:44 6:43 faster than 48%
Sandbag lunges: 3:26 3:49 faster than 71%
Run 8: 5:17 5:31 faster than 59%
Wall balls: 3:45 4:21 faster than 85%
Roxzone: 4:54 6:04 faster than 76%
Runs (8 km) 48:37 50:04 faster than 57%
Stations (8) 28:18
Finish 1:21:45 1:26:49 542nd of 1,546 · faster than 64%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 16-24 1:48:51 2403rd of 2,921; 311th of 385 aged 16-24 42:43* 49:50* 16:22 Runs 42:43 · Stations 49:50 · Roxzone 16:22

2,403rd of 2,921 Open Women (faster than 17%). Against the 89 who finished around 1:46:37: most time gained on sled pull (0:33), most lost on burpee broad jump (2:08). Runs 5 to 8 took 4:01 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 4:21 more).

Emma Horrobin at HYROX London ExCeL 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 2,921 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,921 Open Women here
Run 1: 4:23 3:39 faster than 11%
SkiErg: 5:49 5:33 faster than 27%
Run 2: 5:06 4:20 faster than 15%
Sled push: 3:28 2:46 faster than 14%
Run 3: 4:56 4:30 faster than 28%
Sled pull: 5:53 5:34 faster than 40%
Run 4: 4:57 4:35 faster than 32%
Burpee broad jump: 10:34 6:43 faster than 8%
Run 5: 5:13 4:39 faster than 24%
Row: 5:48 5:34 faster than 32%
Run 6: 5:01 4:37 faster than 30%
Farmers carry: 2:56 2:11 faster than 12%
Run 7: 5:09 4:36 faster than 25%
Sandbag lunges: 6:06 5:02 faster than 23%
Run 8: 8:00 6:33 faster than 18%
Wall balls: 9:16 6:49 faster than 20%
Roxzone: 16:22 13:10 faster than 15%
Runs (8 km) 42:43 37:29 faster than 21%
Stations (8) 49:50
Finish 1:48:51 1:31:10 2403rd of 2,921 · faster than 17%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team U29, with Sian McLeod 1:27:40 709th of 1,118; 259th of 361 aged U29 49:01 32:00 6:45 Runs 49:01 · Stations 32:00 · Roxzone 6:45

709th of 1,118 Doubles Women (faster than 36%). Against the 33 who finished around 1:28:17: most time gained on the eight runs (0:56), most lost on wall balls (0:58). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:07 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:45 more).

Emma Horrobin at HYROX London 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,118 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,118 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:35 5:43 faster than 58%
SkiErg: 4:24 4:35 faster than 78%
Run 2: 5:43 5:29 faster than 37%
Sled push: 2:09 1:48 faster than 13%
Run 3: 5:44 5:40 faster than 47%
Sled pull: 4:12 3:54 faster than 33%
Run 4: 5:57 5:42 faster than 38%
Burpee broad jump: 4:54 4:13 faster than 29%
Run 5: 5:59 5:47 faster than 41%
Row: 5:09 5:05 faster than 42%
Run 6: 6:01 5:46 faster than 37%
Farmers carry: 1:52 1:49 faster than 42%
Run 7: 6:02 5:48 faster than 39%
Sandbag lunges: 3:45 3:42 faster than 47%
Run 8: 8:04 7:51 faster than 43%
Wall balls: 5:35 4:20 faster than 9%
Roxzone: 6:45 5:56 faster than 29%
Runs (8 km) 49:01 47:57 faster than 43%
Stations (8) 32:00
Finish 1:27:40 1:23:57 709th of 1,118 · faster than 36%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 16-24 2:04:15 511th of 539; 77th of 80 aged 16-24 57:03 53:08 14:03 Runs 57:03 · Stations 53:08 · Roxzone 14:03

511th of 539 Open Women (faster than 5%).

Emma Horrobin at HYROX Manchester 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 539 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 539 Open Women here
Run 1: 4:36 4:03 faster than 22%
SkiErg: 5:36 5:00 faster than 8%
Run 2: 6:49 5:35 faster than 10%
Sled push: 3:19 2:36 faster than 11%
Run 3: 6:46 5:52 faster than 17%
Sled pull: 6:02 5:21 faster than 30%
Run 4: 7:24 5:59 faster than 9%
Burpee broad jump: 11:16 6:29 faster than 5%
Run 5: 7:33 6:05 faster than 11%
Row: 5:47 5:17 faster than 17%
Run 6: 7:32 5:59 faster than 9%
Farmers carry: 3:36 2:13 faster than 1%
Run 7: 7:41 6:00 faster than 8%
Sandbag lunges: 6:10 5:02 faster than 21%
Run 8: 8:43 6:07 faster than 5%
Wall balls: 11:22 6:17 faster than 4%
Roxzone: 14:03 7:13 faster than 2%
Runs (8 km) 57:03 45:48 faster than 10%
Stations (8) 53:08
Finish 2:04:15 1:32:13 511th of 539 · faster than 5%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Open Women

The fastest Emma has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 5:36 Manchester 2025 · best of 2 5:16
Sled push 3:19 Manchester 2025 · best of 2 2:55
Sled pull 5:53 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 5:47
Burpee broad jump 10:34 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 6:46
Row 5:47 Manchester 2025 · best of 2 5:31
Farmers carry 2:56 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 2:19
Sandbag lunges 6:06 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 5:13
Wall balls 9:16 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 6:43
Runs (8 km) 42:43 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 46:44
Roxzone 14:03 Manchester 2025 · best of 2 7:57
How to read

Each station's best across Emma's Open Women races, from different races, against the typical Open Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

1 team partner

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Women race

London ExCeL 2025, against 2,921 Open Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Emmaedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Emma sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Pull (faster than 40% of the field), weakest on BBJ (faster than 9%).

See the numbers
Part Emma: faster than
Ski 28%
Push 15%
Pull 40%
BBJ 9%
Row 32%
Carry 12%
Lunges 24%
Wall balls 20%
Roxzone 16%
Runs 22%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 28%
Sled push faster than 15%
Sled pull faster than 40%
Burpee broad jump faster than 9%
Row faster than 32%
Farmers carry faster than 12%
Sandbag lunges faster than 24%
Wall balls faster than 20%
Roxzone faster than 16%
Runs (8 km) faster than 22%

How much of the field Emma beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Sled pull (faster than 40%); weakest: Burpee broad jump (faster than 9%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:16 slower
Sled push 0:42 slower
Sled pull 0:19 slower
Burpee broad jump 3:51 slower
Row 0:14 slower
Farmers carry 0:45 slower
Sandbag lunges 1:04 slower
Wall balls 2:27 slower
Roxzone 3:12 slower
Runs (8 km) 5:14 slower

Emma's time on each part against the typical Open Women finisher at this race.Best: Row (0:14 slower); weakest: Runs (8 km) (5:14 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Emma against the typical Open Women finisher

Emma1:48:51
4:235:495:063:284:565:534:5710:345:135:485:012:565:096:068:009:1616:22
Typical Open Women1:30:51
3:395:334:202:464:305:344:356:434:395:344:372:114:365:026:336:4913:10
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Emma: 42:45 running, 49:50 at the stations and 16:22 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (10:34).Below, Typical Open Women: 37:29 running, 40:12 at the stations and 13:10 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (6:49).

See the numbers
Part Emma Typical Open Women
Run 1 4:23 3:39
SkiErg 5:49 5:33
Run 2 5:06 4:20
Sled push 3:28 2:46
Run 3 4:56 4:30
Sled pull 5:53 5:34
Run 4 4:57 4:35
Burpee broad jump 10:34 6:43
Run 5 5:13 4:39
Row 5:48 5:34
Run 6 5:01 4:37
Farmers carry 2:56 2:11
Run 7 5:09 4:36
Sandbag lunges 6:06 5:02
Run 8 8:00 6:33
Wall balls 9:16 6:49
Roxzone 16:22 13:10
Finish 1:48:51 1:31:10

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Burpee broad jump cost 3:51 against the typical Open Women finisher at London ExCeL 2025. The burpee broad jump guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix burpee broad jump. Then beat 1:48:51.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report