Athlete · Doubles Women · team 30-39 · GBR GBR

Emily Walton

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/emily-walton-t-3f009a

4 HYROX races over 2 seasons, all in a team with 2 partners.

Best Doubles Women time1:12:03Manchester 2025
Best Doubles Women place113thof 857 · Manchester 2025
Latest race1:22:10Glasgow 2026 · Doubles Mixed with George MoodyFirst Doubles Mixed race
Strongest part of the raceSandbag lungesfaster than 96% of Doubles Women at Manchester 2025
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:13:001:14:001:15:00 best 1:12:03

This line shows the finish time of Emily Walton at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:12:03 at Manchester (Jan 2025); Emily Walton was 3:12 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
London Dec 2024 Doubles Women 1:15:15
Manchester Jan 2025 Doubles Women 1:12:03

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

4 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Mixed, team 30-34, with George Moody 1:22:10 1027th of 2,163; 231st of 452 aged 30-34 48:37 27:21 6:17 Runs 48:37 · Stations 27:21 · Roxzone 6:17

1,027th of 2,163 Doubles Mixed (faster than 52%). Against the 67 who finished around 1:21:04: most time gained on sled pull (0:36), most lost on the eight runs (1:47). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:14 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:32 more).

Emily Walton at HYROX Glasgow 2026, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 2,163 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,163 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 5:47 5:46 faster than 48%
SkiErg: 4:20 4:20 faster than 51%
Run 2: 5:41 5:34 faster than 45%
Sled push: 1:39 2:08 faster than 94%
Run 3: 5:51 5:50 faster than 49%
Sled pull: 3:02 3:37 faster than 83%
Run 4: 5:54 5:54 faster than 49%
Burpee broad jump: 3:14 3:38 faster than 67%
Run 5: 6:08 6:00 faster than 45%
Row: 4:49 4:54 faster than 58%
Run 6: 6:00 5:58 faster than 49%
Farmers carry: 2:00 1:51 faster than 31%
Run 7: 6:15 5:58 faster than 38%
Sandbag lunges: 4:01 4:07 faster than 54%
Run 8: 7:04 6:41 faster than 38%
Wall balls: 4:16 4:50 faster than 76%
Roxzone: 6:17 5:10 faster than 27%
Runs (8 km) 48:37 47:51 faster than 46%
Stations (8) 27:21
Finish 1:22:10 1:23:17 1027th of 2,163 · faster than 52%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Doubles Women, team 30-39, with Caroline Metcalfe 1:18:05 47th of 111; 17th of 38 aged 30-39 43:35 29:31 4:59† Runs 43:35 · Stations 29:31 · Roxzone 4:59

47th of 111 Pro Doubles Women (faster than 58%).

Emily Walton at HYROX Cardiff 2025, Pro Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 111 Pro Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 111 Pro Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:29 5:19 faster than 41%
SkiErg: 4:47 4:35 faster than 22%
Run 2: 5:10 4:57 faster than 38%
Sled push: 2:13 2:24 faster than 66%
Run 3: 5:15 5:12 faster than 46%
Sled pull: 5:02 4:56 faster than 46%
Run 4: 5:24 5:12 faster than 37%
Burpee broad jump: 3:21 4:12 faster than 83%
Run 5: 5:23 5:20 faster than 44%
Row: 5:03 5:00 faster than 46%
Run 6: 5:27 5:17 faster than 40%
Farmers carry: 1:53 1:58 faster than 68%
Run 7: 5:27 5:18 faster than 43%
Sandbag lunges: 3:25 4:06 faster than 76%
Run 8: 6:00 6:06 faster than 58%
Wall balls: 3:47 4:15 faster than 79%
Roxzone †: 4:59
Runs (8 km) 43:35 42:56 faster than 46%
Stations (8) 29:31
Finish 1:18:05 1:20:17 47th of 111 · faster than 58%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 30-39, with Caroline Metcalfe 1:12:03 113th of 857; 47th of 324 aged 30-39 42:14 24:18 5:42 Runs 42:14 · Stations 24:18 · Roxzone 5:42

113th of 857 Doubles Women (faster than 86%).

Emily Walton at HYROX Manchester 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 857 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 857 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 3:49 4:23 faster than 78%
SkiErg: 4:33 4:33 faster than 50%
Run 2: 5:16 5:59 faster than 80%
Sled push: 1:26 1:41 faster than 90%
Run 3: 5:43 6:16 faster than 73%
Sled pull: 3:00 3:50 faster than 92%
Run 4: 5:27 6:21 faster than 84%
Burpee broad jump: 2:52 4:01 faster than 90%
Run 5: 5:34 6:24 faster than 82%
Row: 4:46 5:03 faster than 80%
Run 6: 5:32 6:22 faster than 83%
Farmers carry: 1:37 1:50 faster than 81%
Run 7: 5:35 6:22 faster than 81%
Sandbag lunges: 2:33 3:33 faster than 96%
Run 8: 5:21 6:20 faster than 86%
Wall balls: 3:31 4:04 faster than 90%
Roxzone: 5:42 7:08 faster than 87%
Runs (8 km) 42:14 48:51 faster than 84%
Stations (8) 24:18
Finish 1:12:03 1:24:05 113th of 857 · faster than 86%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 30-39, with Caroline Metcalfe 1:15:15 311th of 1,668; 124th of 654 aged 30-39 41:38 26:27 7:16 Runs 41:38 · Stations 26:27 · Roxzone 7:16

311th of 1,668 Doubles Women (faster than 81%). Against the 51 who finished around 1:15:44: most time gained on burpee broad jump (0:39), most lost on the roxzone (0:21). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:35 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:43 less).

Emily Walton at HYROX London 2024, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,668 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,668 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:22 7:10 faster than 80%
SkiErg: 4:29 4:39 faster than 73%
Run 2: 4:48 5:15 faster than 74%
Sled push: 1:44 1:54 faster than 74%
Run 3: 5:02 5:26 faster than 72%
Sled pull: 3:55 4:12 faster than 67%
Run 4: 4:56 5:30 faster than 79%
Burpee broad jump: 3:01 4:15 faster than 93%
Run 5: 5:00 5:36 faster than 79%
Row: 5:10 5:07 faster than 45%
Run 6: 5:16 5:34 faster than 66%
Farmers carry: 1:41 1:46 faster than 65%
Run 7: 4:57 5:34 faster than 80%
Sandbag lunges: 2:51 3:33 faster than 87%
Run 8: 5:20 6:01 faster than 79%
Wall balls: 3:36 4:21 faster than 94%
Roxzone: 7:16 8:09 faster than 71%
Runs (8 km) 41:38 46:15 faster than 77%
Stations (8) 26:27
Finish 1:15:15 1:24:23 311th of 1,668 · faster than 81%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. † This venue did not time the roxzone: the figure is the finish minus runs and stations, and part of the walk is inside the run laps there, so it is shorter than at other venues. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group.

Best splits · Doubles Women

The fastest Emily has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:29 London 2024 · best of 2 4:49
Sled push 1:26 Manchester 2025 · best of 2 1:52
Sled pull 3:00 Manchester 2025 · best of 2 4:13
Burpee broad jump 2:52 Manchester 2025 · best of 2 4:18
Row 4:46 Manchester 2025 · best of 2 5:13
Farmers carry 1:37 Manchester 2025 · best of 2 1:52
Sandbag lunges 2:33 Manchester 2025 · best of 2 3:47
Wall balls 3:31 Manchester 2025 · best of 2 4:22
Runs (8 km) 41:38 London 2024 · best of 2 49:17
Roxzone 5:42 Manchester 2025 · best of 2 7:46
How to read

Each station's best across Emily's Doubles Women races, from different races, against the typical Doubles Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

2 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Doubles Women race

Manchester 2025, against 857 Doubles Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Emilyedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Emily sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Lunges (faster than 96% of the field), weakest on Ski (faster than 50%).

See the numbers
Part Emily: faster than
Ski 50%
Push 90%
Pull 92%
BBJ 90%
Row 80%
Carry 81%
Lunges 96%
Wall balls 91%
Roxzone 87%
Runs 84%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 50%
Sled push faster than 90%
Sled pull faster than 92%
Burpee broad jump faster than 90%
Row faster than 80%
Farmers carry faster than 81%
Sandbag lunges faster than 96%
Wall balls faster than 91%
Roxzone faster than 87%
Runs (8 km) faster than 84%

How much of the field Emily beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Sandbag lunges (faster than 96%); weakest: SkiErg (faster than 50%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg level
Sled push 0:15 faster
Sled pull 0:50 faster
Burpee broad jump 1:09 faster
Row 0:17 faster
Farmers carry 0:13 faster
Sandbag lunges 1:00 faster
Wall balls 0:33 faster
Roxzone 1:26 faster
Runs (8 km) 6:37 faster

Emily's time on each part against the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (6:37 faster); weakest: SkiErg (level).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Emily against the typical Doubles Women finisher

Emily1:12:03
3:494:335:161:265:433:005:272:525:344:465:321:375:352:335:213:315:42
Typical Doubles Women1:24:10
4:234:335:591:416:163:506:214:016:245:036:221:506:223:336:204:047:08
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Emily: 42:17 running, 24:19 at the stations and 5:42 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (4:46) and the shortest the sled push (1:26).Below, Typical Doubles Women: 48:27 running, 28:34 at the stations and 7:08 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:03) and the shortest the sled push (1:41).

See the numbers
Part Emily Typical Doubles Women
Run 1 3:49 4:23
SkiErg 4:33 4:33
Run 2 5:16 5:59
Sled push 1:26 1:41
Run 3 5:43 6:16
Sled pull 3:00 3:50
Run 4 5:27 6:21
Burpee broad jump 2:52 4:01
Run 5 5:34 6:24
Row 4:46 5:03
Run 6 5:32 6:22
Farmers carry 1:37 1:50
Run 7 5:35 6:22
Sandbag lunges 2:33 3:33
Run 8 5:21 6:20
Wall balls 3:31 4:04
Roxzone 5:42 7:08
Finish 1:12:03 1:24:05

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Training for the next one? Let's beat 1:12:03.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report