Athlete · Doubles Women · team 50-54 · GBR GBR

Angela Baker

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/angela-baker-t-09ce45

4 HYROX races over 2 seasons, all in a team with 3 partners. Best Doubles Women time: 1:23:00 at Birmingham 2024.

Best Doubles Women time1:23:00Birmingham 2024
Best Doubles Women place578thof 1,370 · Birmingham 2024
Latest race1:34:58Cardiff 2026 · Doubles Women with Sue Morling11:58 slower than Angela's best Doubles Women time (1:23:00)
Strongest part of the raceSled pushfaster than 92% of Doubles Women at Birmingham 2024

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:24:001:26:001:28:001:30:001:32:001:34:00 best 1:23:00 best 1:23:00 · Birmingham

This line shows the finish time of Angela Baker at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:23:00 at Birmingham (Oct 2024); Angela Baker was 11:58 slower at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Birmingham Oct 2024 Doubles Women 1:23:00
Manchester Jan 2025 Doubles Women 1:26:00
Nice Feb 2026 Doubles Women 1:27:00
Cardiff Apr 2026 Doubles Women 1:34:58

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

4 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Women, team 50-54, with Sue Morling 1:34:58 1852nd of 2,444; 49th of 80 aged 50-54 53:30 37:29 3:59† Runs 53:30 · Stations 37:29 · Roxzone 3:59

1,852nd of 2,444 Doubles Women (faster than 24%). Against the 73 who finished around 1:34:29: most time gained on the eight runs (1:02), most lost on wall balls (2:43). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:05 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:34 more).

Angela Baker at HYROX Cardiff 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,444 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,444 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:35 6:21 faster than 40%
SkiErg: 4:48 4:50 faster than 56%
Run 2: 6:09 5:47 faster than 33%
Sled push: 2:08 1:52 faster than 19%
Run 3: 6:29 6:03 faster than 32%
Sled pull: 3:44 3:55 faster than 61%
Run 4: 6:31 6:05 faster than 31%
Burpee broad jump: 6:05 4:41 faster than 16%
Run 5: 6:50 6:11 faster than 25%
Row: 5:17 5:13 faster than 43%
Run 6: 6:59 6:27 faster than 29%
Farmers carry: 2:19 2:22 faster than 56%
Run 7: 6:27 5:47 faster than 24%
Sandbag lunges: 5:28 3:37 faster than 4%
Run 8: 7:33 6:59 faster than 32%
Wall balls: 7:40 4:20 faster than 1%
Roxzone †: 3:59
Runs (8 km) 53:30 49:56 faster than 30%
Stations (8) 37:29
Finish 1:34:58 1:25:36 1852nd of 2,444 · faster than 24%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Nice 2026 12 Feb 2026
Race results
Doubles Women, team 45-49, with Emma Lund 1:27:00 751st of 1,402; 17th of 52 aged 45-49 49:29 29:28 8:08 Runs 49:29 · Stations 29:28 · Roxzone 8:08

751st of 1,402 Doubles Women (faster than 46%). Against the 44 who finished around 1:27:26: most time gained on sled pull (0:54), most lost on the roxzone (1:05). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:14 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:47 more).

Angela Baker at HYROX Nice 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,402 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,402 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:43 6:05 faster than 69%
SkiErg: 4:32 4:55 faster than 90%
Run 2: 5:27 5:44 faster than 66%
Sled push: 1:48 1:39 faster than 26%
Run 3: 5:56 6:00 faster than 54%
Sled pull: 3:18 4:11 faster than 93%
Run 4: 6:03 6:02 faster than 48%
Burpee broad jump: 4:13 4:15 faster than 51%
Run 5: 6:22 6:11 faster than 41%
Row: 4:52 5:07 faster than 77%
Run 6: 6:25 6:05 faster than 35%
Farmers carry: 1:42 1:47 faster than 65%
Run 7: 6:43 6:08 faster than 27%
Sandbag lunges: 4:10 3:54 faster than 37%
Run 8: 6:52 6:06 faster than 23%
Wall balls: 4:53 4:28 faster than 31%
Roxzone: 8:08 6:47 faster than 20%
Runs (8 km) 49:29 48:29 faster than 43%
Stations (8) 29:28
Finish 1:27:00 1:26:07 751st of 1,402 · faster than 46%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 40-49, with Laura Stubbings 1:26:00 471st of 857; 82nd of 177 aged 40-49 49:48 28:34 8:16 Runs 49:48 · Stations 28:34 · Roxzone 8:16

471st of 857 Doubles Women (faster than 45%).

Angela Baker at HYROX Manchester 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 857 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 857 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:12 4:23 faster than 60%
SkiErg: 4:39 4:33 faster than 35%
Run 2: 5:51 5:59 faster than 56%
Sled push: 1:43 1:41 faster than 47%
Run 3: 6:08 6:16 faster than 56%
Sled pull: 4:12 3:50 faster than 29%
Run 4: 6:30 6:21 faster than 43%
Burpee broad jump: 3:48 4:01 faster than 57%
Run 5: 6:38 6:24 faster than 41%
Row: 5:18 5:03 faster than 27%
Run 6: 6:44 6:22 faster than 35%
Farmers carry: 1:46 1:50 faster than 58%
Run 7: 6:43 6:22 faster than 36%
Sandbag lunges: 3:14 3:33 faster than 68%
Run 8: 7:02 6:20 faster than 26%
Wall balls: 3:54 4:04 faster than 62%
Roxzone: 8:16 7:08 faster than 29%
Runs (8 km) 49:48 48:51 faster than 44%
Stations (8) 28:34
Finish 1:26:00 1:24:05 471st of 857 · faster than 45%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 40-49, with Emma Lund 1:23:00 578th of 1,370; 94th of 287 aged 40-49 46:41 28:17 8:06 Runs 46:41 · Stations 28:17 · Roxzone 8:06

578th of 1,370 Doubles Women (faster than 57%). Against the 43 who finished around 1:22:39: most time gained on sled pull (0:23), most lost on the roxzone (0:34). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:54 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:11 more).

Angela Baker at HYROX Birmingham 2024, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,370 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,370 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:01 6:28 faster than 72%
SkiErg: 4:26 4:37 faster than 76%
Run 2: 5:27 5:33 faster than 55%
Sled push: 1:29 1:46 faster than 91%
Run 3: 5:39 5:45 faster than 56%
Sled pull: 3:35 4:01 faster than 73%
Run 4: 5:48 5:50 faster than 52%
Burpee broad jump: 4:28 4:13 faster than 41%
Run 5: 5:55 5:56 faster than 51%
Row: 4:42 5:04 faster than 86%
Run 6: 6:03 5:53 faster than 39%
Farmers carry: 1:44 1:48 faster than 61%
Run 7: 5:55 5:53 faster than 48%
Sandbag lunges: 3:32 3:31 faster than 49%
Run 8: 5:56 6:06 faster than 57%
Wall balls: 4:21 4:22 faster than 51%
Roxzone: 8:06 8:05 faster than 49%
Runs (8 km) 46:41 47:20 faster than 55%
Stations (8) 28:17
Finish 1:23:00 1:24:53 578th of 1,370 · faster than 57%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. † This venue did not time the roxzone: the figure is the finish minus runs and stations, and part of the walk is inside the run laps there, so it is shorter than at other venues. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group.

Best splits · Doubles Women

The fastest Angela has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:26 Birmingham 2024 · best of 4 4:49
Sled push 1:29 Birmingham 2024 · best of 4 1:52
Sled pull 3:18 Nice 2026 · best of 4 4:13
Burpee broad jump 3:48 Manchester 2025 · best of 4 4:18
Row 4:42 Birmingham 2024 · best of 4 5:13
Farmers carry 1:42 Nice 2026 · best of 4 1:52
Sandbag lunges 3:14 Manchester 2025 · best of 4 3:47
Wall balls 3:54 Manchester 2025 · best of 4 4:22
Runs (8 km) 46:41 Birmingham 2024 · best of 4 49:17
Roxzone 8:06 Birmingham 2024 · best of 3 7:46
How to read

Each station's best across Angela's Doubles Women races, from different races, against the typical Doubles Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

3 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Doubles Women race

Birmingham 2024, against 1,370 Doubles Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Angelaedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Angela sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Push (faster than 92% of the field), weakest on BBJ (faster than 42%).

See the numbers
Part Angela: faster than
Ski 77%
Push 92%
Pull 74%
BBJ 42%
Row 86%
Carry 61%
Lunges 49%
Wall balls 51%
Roxzone 50%
Runs 55%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 77%
Sled push faster than 92%
Sled pull faster than 74%
Burpee broad jump faster than 42%
Row faster than 86%
Farmers carry faster than 61%
Sandbag lunges faster than 49%
Wall balls faster than 51%
Roxzone faster than 50%
Runs (8 km) faster than 55%

How much of the field Angela beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Sled push (faster than 92%); weakest: Burpee broad jump (faster than 42%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:11 faster
Sled push 0:17 faster
Sled pull 0:26 faster
Burpee broad jump 0:15 slower
Row 0:22 faster
Farmers carry 0:04 faster
Sandbag lunges 0:01 slower
Wall balls 0:01 faster
Roxzone 0:01 slower
Runs (8 km) 0:39 faster

Angela's time on each part against the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (0:39 faster); weakest: Burpee broad jump (0:15 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Angela against the typical Doubles Women finisher

Angela1:23:00
6:014:265:271:295:393:355:484:285:554:426:031:445:553:325:564:218:06
Typical Doubles Women1:24:51
6:284:375:331:465:454:015:504:135:565:045:531:485:533:316:064:228:05
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Angela: 46:44 running, 28:16 at the stations and 8:06 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (4:42) and the shortest the sled push (1:29).Below, Typical Doubles Women: 47:24 running, 29:22 at the stations and 8:05 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:04) and the shortest the sled push (1:46).

See the numbers
Part Angela Typical Doubles Women
Run 1 6:01 6:28
SkiErg 4:26 4:37
Run 2 5:27 5:33
Sled push 1:29 1:46
Run 3 5:39 5:45
Sled pull 3:35 4:01
Run 4 5:48 5:50
Burpee broad jump 4:28 4:13
Run 5 5:55 5:56
Row 4:42 5:04
Run 6 6:03 5:53
Farmers carry 1:44 1:48
Run 7 5:55 5:53
Sandbag lunges 3:32 3:31
Run 8 5:56 6:06
Wall balls 4:21 4:22
Roxzone 8:06 8:05
Finish 1:23:00 1:24:53

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Training for the next one? Let's beat 1:23:00.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report