NED Amber Scheringa
5 HYROX races over 2 seasons, all in a team with 4 partners.
One best per race type
Finish time, race by race: one race type at a time
Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting fasterThis line shows the finish time of Amber Scheringa at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:11:23 at Heerenveen (May 2026); Amber Scheringa was 11:50 faster at the latest race than at the first.
See the numbers
| Race | Date | Division | Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heerenveen | May 2025 | Doubles Women | 1:23:13 |
| Ghent | Dec 2025 | Doubles Women | 1:12:12 |
| Heerenveen | May 2026 | Doubles Women | 1:11:23 |
Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.
This line shows the finish time of Amber Scheringa at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:19:13 at Rotterdam (Apr 2026); Amber Scheringa was 1:49 faster at the latest race than at the first.
See the numbers
| Race | Date | Division | Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maastricht | Sep 2025 | Doubles Mixed | 1:21:02 |
| Rotterdam | Apr 2026 | Doubles Mixed | 1:19:13 |
Each dot is one Doubles Mixed race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Mixed races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.
5 results at 5 races
98th of 1,497 Doubles Women (faster than 93%). Against the 45 who finished around 1:09:57: most time gained on sled pull (0:17), most lost on sled push (0:32). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:31 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:03 more).
| Part | Time | Typical here | vs 1,497 Doubles Women here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1: | 4:13 | 5:34 | faster than 96% |
| SkiErg: | 4:24 | 4:37 | faster than 83% |
| Run 2: | 4:32 | 5:41 | faster than 94% |
| Sled push: | 2:05 | 1:42 | faster than 9% |
| Run 3: | 4:49 | 5:52 | faster than 93% |
| Sled pull: | 2:51 | 3:40 | faster than 96% |
| Run 4: | 4:48 | 5:56 | faster than 93% |
| Burpee broad jump: | 3:47 | 4:28 | faster than 77% |
| Run 5: | 4:52 | 6:03 | faster than 94% |
| Row: | 4:31 | 5:06 | faster than 98% |
| Run 6: | 4:52 | 5:57 | faster than 93% |
| Farmers carry: | 1:43 | 1:50 | faster than 71% |
| Run 7: | 5:00 | 5:59 | faster than 91% |
| Sandbag lunges: | 3:12 | 3:38 | faster than 77% |
| Run 8: | 5:09 | 6:23 | faster than 92% |
| Wall balls: | 3:43 | 4:16 | faster than 86% |
| Roxzone: | 6:59 | 8:29 | faster than 87% |
| Runs (8 km) | 38:11 | 47:37 | faster than 93% |
| Stations (8) | 26:16 | ||
| Finish | 1:11:23 | 1:25:44 | 98th of 1,497 · faster than 93% |
776th of 2,213 Doubles Mixed (faster than 64%). Against the 68 who finished around 1:19:13: most time gained on the eight runs (1:44), most lost on the roxzone (0:44). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:54 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:17 more).
| Part | Time | Typical here | vs 2,213 Doubles Mixed here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1: | 4:52 | 5:40 | faster than 82% |
| SkiErg: | 4:24 | 4:33 | faster than 71% |
| Run 2: | 4:39 | 5:22 | faster than 79% |
| Sled push: | 2:19 | 1:57 | faster than 17% |
| Run 3: | 5:10 | 5:40 | faster than 73% |
| Sled pull: | 3:35 | 3:41 | faster than 57% |
| Run 4: | 5:10 | 5:44 | faster than 74% |
| Burpee broad jump: | 4:15 | 3:48 | faster than 32% |
| Run 5: | 5:19 | 5:48 | faster than 71% |
| Row: | 4:39 | 4:50 | faster than 69% |
| Run 6: | 5:29 | 5:44 | faster than 63% |
| Farmers carry: | 1:53 | 1:49 | faster than 42% |
| Run 7: | 5:32 | 5:48 | faster than 63% |
| Sandbag lunges: | 3:41 | 4:06 | faster than 69% |
| Run 8: | 6:26 | 6:36 | faster than 56% |
| Wall balls: | 4:44 | 4:41 | faster than 48% |
| Roxzone: | 7:14 | 7:01 | faster than 45% |
| Runs (8 km) | 42:34 | 46:31 | faster than 72% |
| Stations (8) | 29:30 | ||
| Finish | 1:19:13 | 1:23:41 | 776th of 2,213 · faster than 64% |
63rd of 886 Doubles Women (faster than 92%).
| Part | Time | Typical here | vs 886 Doubles Women here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1: | 4:59 | 6:11 | faster than 92% |
| SkiErg: | 4:23 | 4:47 | faster than 92% |
| Run 2: | 4:31 | 5:42 | faster than 94% |
| Sled push: | 1:42 | 1:51 | faster than 73% |
| Run 3: | 4:48 | 5:57 | faster than 94% |
| Sled pull: | 4:02 | 4:21 | faster than 69% |
| Run 4: | 4:52 | 6:00 | faster than 93% |
| Burpee broad jump: | 3:30 | 4:11 | faster than 80% |
| Run 5: | 5:17 | 6:09 | faster than 86% |
| Row: | 4:43 | 5:09 | faster than 92% |
| Run 6: | 4:59 | 6:05 | faster than 92% |
| Farmers carry: | 1:54 | 1:52 | faster than 46% |
| Run 7: | 4:51 | 6:04 | faster than 94% |
| Sandbag lunges: | 3:04 | 3:36 | faster than 79% |
| Run 8: | 5:05 | 6:09 | faster than 90% |
| Wall balls: | 3:55 | 4:25 | faster than 82% |
| Roxzone: | 5:46 | 7:37 | faster than 93% |
| Runs (8 km) | 39:18 | 48:27 | faster than 93% |
| Stations (8) | 27:13 | ||
| Finish | 1:12:12 | 1:26:53 | 63rd of 886 · faster than 92% |
387th of 1,026 Doubles Mixed (faster than 62%). Against the 31 who finished around 1:21:51: most time gained on burpee broad jump (0:26), most lost on wall balls (0:33). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:06 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:42 more).
| Part | Time | Typical here | vs 1,026 Doubles Mixed here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1: | 5:20 | 5:33 | faster than 59% |
| SkiErg: | 4:08 | 4:15 | faster than 70% |
| Run 2: | 4:59 | 5:22 | faster than 67% |
| Sled push: | 1:32 | 1:56 | faster than 96% |
| Run 3: | 7:48 | 5:39 | faster than 4% |
| Sled pull: | 3:58 | 4:15 | faster than 63% |
| Run 4: | 5:08 | 5:44 | faster than 77% |
| Burpee broad jump: | 3:29 | 3:54 | faster than 67% |
| Run 5: | 5:23 | 6:00 | faster than 75% |
| Row: | 4:37 | 4:48 | faster than 68% |
| Run 6: | 5:30 | 5:53 | faster than 68% |
| Farmers carry: | 1:53 | 1:50 | faster than 42% |
| Run 7: | 5:28 | 5:53 | faster than 69% |
| Sandbag lunges: | 4:00 | 4:04 | faster than 52% |
| Run 8: | 5:47 | 6:20 | faster than 70% |
| Wall balls: | 5:05 | 4:57 | faster than 47% |
| Roxzone: | 7:07 | 7:45 | faster than 64% |
| Runs (8 km) | 45:18 | 46:38 | faster than 57% |
| Stations (8) | 28:42 | ||
| Finish | 1:21:02 | 1:24:54 | 387th of 1,026 · faster than 62% |
287th of 858 Doubles Women (faster than 66%).
| Part | Time | Typical here | vs 858 Doubles Women here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1: | 4:35 | 5:29 | faster than 91% |
| SkiErg: | 4:49 | 4:37 | faster than 25% |
| Run 2: | 5:09 | 5:41 | faster than 77% |
| Sled push: | 1:48 | 1:41 | faster than 33% |
| Run 3: | 5:25 | 5:56 | faster than 77% |
| Sled pull: | 5:21 | 3:54 | faster than 3% |
| Run 4: | 5:19 | 6:02 | faster than 84% |
| Burpee broad jump: | 4:27 | 4:26 | faster than 49% |
| Run 5: | 5:32 | 6:13 | faster than 80% |
| Row: | 5:13 | 5:12 | faster than 48% |
| Run 6: | 5:21 | 6:06 | faster than 83% |
| Farmers carry: | 1:57 | 1:56 | faster than 48% |
| Run 7: | 5:33 | 6:09 | faster than 78% |
| Sandbag lunges: | 3:14 | 3:42 | faster than 78% |
| Run 8: | 6:05 | 6:37 | faster than 71% |
| Wall balls: | 4:40 | 4:01 | faster than 14% |
| Roxzone: | 8:52 | 9:20 | faster than 61% |
| Runs (8 km) | 42:56 | 48:15 | faster than 82% |
| Stations (8) | 31:29 | ||
| Finish | 1:23:13 | 1:27:28 | 287th of 858 · faster than 66% |
How to read
Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group.
The fastest Amber has done each station
| Part | Best | Race | Typical |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | 4:23 | Ghent 2025 · best of 3 | 4:49 |
| Sled push | 1:42 | Ghent 2025 · best of 3 | 1:52 |
| Sled pull | 2:51 | Heerenveen 2026 · best of 3 | 4:13 |
| Burpee broad jump | 3:30 | Ghent 2025 · best of 3 | 4:18 |
| Row | 4:31 | Heerenveen 2026 · best of 3 | 5:13 |
| Farmers carry | 1:43 | Heerenveen 2026 · best of 3 | 1:52 |
| Sandbag lunges | 3:04 | Ghent 2025 · best of 3 | 3:47 |
| Wall balls | 3:43 | Heerenveen 2026 · best of 3 | 4:22 |
| Runs (8 km) | 38:11 | Heerenveen 2026 · best of 3 | 49:17 |
| Roxzone | 5:46 | Ghent 2025 · best of 3 | 7:46 |
How to read
Each station's best across Amber's Doubles Women races, from different races, against the typical Doubles Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.
4 team partners
- Christel Van der Ploeg2 races
- Dianne Van Meerveld1 race
- Mark De Boer1 race
- Sander Scheringa1 race
From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.
Heerenveen 2026, against 1,497 Doubles Women
Shape of the race
This chart shows where Amber sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Row (faster than 98% of the field), weakest on Push (faster than 9%).
See the numbers
| Part | Amber: faster than |
|---|---|
| Ski | 83% |
| Push | 9% |
| Pull | 96% |
| BBJ | 78% |
| Row | 98% |
| Carry | 72% |
| Lunges | 77% |
| Wall balls | 86% |
| Roxzone | 87% |
| Runs | 94% |
Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.
How you ranked on each station
How much of the field Amber beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Row (faster than 98%); weakest: Sled push (faster than 9%).
Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.
Minutes against the typical finisher
Amber's time on each part against the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (9:26 faster); weakest: Sled push (0:23 slower).
Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.
The race as one bar: Amber against the typical Doubles Women finisher
This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Amber: 38:16 running, 26:16 at the stations and 6:59 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (4:31).Below, Typical Doubles Women: 47:25 running, 29:17 at the stations and 8:29 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:06) and the shortest the sled push (1:42).
See the numbers
| Part | Amber | Typical Doubles Women |
|---|---|---|
| Run 1 | 4:13 | 5:34 |
| SkiErg | 4:24 | 4:37 |
| Run 2 | 4:32 | 5:41 |
| Sled push | 2:05 | 1:42 |
| Run 3 | 4:49 | 5:52 |
| Sled pull | 2:51 | 3:40 |
| Run 4 | 4:48 | 5:56 |
| Burpee broad jump | 3:47 | 4:28 |
| Run 5 | 4:52 | 6:03 |
| Row | 4:31 | 5:06 |
| Run 6 | 4:52 | 5:57 |
| Farmers carry | 1:43 | 1:50 |
| Run 7 | 5:00 | 5:59 |
| Sandbag lunges | 3:12 | 3:38 |
| Run 8 | 5:09 | 6:23 |
| Wall balls | 3:43 | 4:16 |
| Roxzone | 6:59 | 8:29 |
| Finish | 1:11:23 | 1:25:44 |
The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.
Sled push cost 0:23 against the typical Doubles Women finisher at Heerenveen 2026. The sled push guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.
Fix sled push. Then beat 1:11:23.
The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.
- A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
- Extra work on your slowest stations
- Adjusts every week to what you actually did
Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.
