Athlete · Open Women · 30-34 · GBR GBR

Amber Ryan

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/amber-ryan-15a696c2

4 HYROX races over 2 seasons: 2 solo, 2 in a team with 2 partners.

Best Open Women time1:34:05London ExCeL 2025
Best Open Women place906thof 1,726 · Glasgow 2026
Latest race1:22:44Cardiff 2026 · Doubles Women with Kelly LushAmber's best Doubles Women time so far
Strongest part of the raceRuns (8 km)faster than 64% of Open Women at London ExCeL 2025
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Finish time, race by race: one race type at a time

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:35:001:36:001:37:00 best 1:34:05

This line shows the finish time of Amber Ryan at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:34:05 at London ExCeL (Dec 2025); Amber Ryan was 1:44 slower at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
London ExCeL Dec 2025 Open Women 1:34:05
Glasgow Mar 2026 Open Women 1:35:49

Each dot is one Open Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Open Women races yet to measure the change.

Every race

4 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Women, team 30-34, with Kelly Lush 1:22:44 964th of 2,444; 215th of 479 aged 30-34 47:19 31:52 3:33† Runs 47:19 · Stations 31:52 · Roxzone 3:33

964th of 2,444 Doubles Women (faster than 60%). Against the 75 who finished around 1:22:53: most time gained on the eight runs (0:34), most lost on wall balls (0:33). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:37 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:01 more).

Amber Ryan at HYROX Cardiff 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,444 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,444 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:45 6:21 faster than 76%
SkiErg: 4:56 4:50 faster than 39%
Run 2: 5:33 5:47 faster than 62%
Sled push: 2:19 1:52 faster than 9%
Run 3: 6:02 6:03 faster than 50%
Sled pull: 3:47 3:55 faster than 58%
Run 4: 6:03 6:05 faster than 51%
Burpee broad jump: 4:51 4:41 faster than 44%
Run 5: 5:56 6:11 faster than 61%
Row: 5:01 5:13 faster than 72%
Run 6: 6:12 6:27 faster than 61%
Farmers carry: 2:20 2:22 faster than 54%
Run 7: 5:19 5:47 faster than 70%
Sandbag lunges: 3:50 3:37 faster than 40%
Run 8: 6:33 6:59 faster than 66%
Wall balls: 4:48 4:20 faster than 30%
Roxzone †: 3:33
Runs (8 km) 47:19 49:56 faster than 64%
Stations (8) 31:52
Finish 1:22:44 1:25:36 964th of 2,444 · faster than 60%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 30-34 1:35:49 906th of 1,726; 164th of 290 aged 30-34 45:55 44:29 5:30 Runs 45:55 · Stations 44:29 · Roxzone 5:30

906th of 1,726 Open Women (faster than 47%). Against the 52 who finished around 1:34:52: most time gained on the eight runs (2:03), most lost on wall balls (2:53). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:05 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:32 more).

Amber Ryan at HYROX Glasgow 2026, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,726 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,726 Open Women here
Run 1: 5:48 5:48 faster than 49%
SkiErg: 5:13 5:15 faster than 54%
Run 2: 5:23 5:40 faster than 63%
Sled push: 2:50 2:48 faster than 48%
Run 3: 5:32 5:56 faster than 67%
Sled pull: 5:20 5:12 faster than 45%
Run 4: 5:44 5:58 faster than 60%
Burpee broad jump: 6:56 6:57 faster than 50%
Run 5: 5:45 6:06 faster than 64%
Row: 5:32 5:38 faster than 59%
Run 6: 5:48 5:58 faster than 57%
Farmers carry: 2:54 2:19 faster than 17%
Run 7: 5:43 5:56 faster than 60%
Sandbag lunges: 5:30 5:15 faster than 43%
Run 8: 6:15 6:50 faster than 72%
Wall balls: 10:14 7:04 faster than 14%
Roxzone: 5:30 5:35 faster than 52%
Runs (8 km) 45:55 48:36 faster than 63%
Stations (8) 44:29
Finish 1:35:49 1:34:53 906th of 1,726 · faster than 47%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 30-34 1:34:05 1675th of 2,921; 387th of 618 aged 30-34 35:35* 46:06* 12:28 Runs 35:35 · Stations 46:06 · Roxzone 12:28

1,675th of 2,921 Open Women (faster than 42%). Against the 88 who finished around 1:33:13: most time gained on the eight runs (2:29), most lost on wall balls (2:58). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:46 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 3:20 more).

Amber Ryan at HYROX London ExCeL 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 2,921 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,921 Open Women here
Run 1: 3:48 3:39 faster than 40%
SkiErg: 5:44 5:33 faster than 33%
Run 2: 4:08 4:20 faster than 63%
Sled push: 2:51 2:46 faster than 43%
Run 3: 4:10 4:30 faster than 69%
Sled pull: 6:06 5:34 faster than 33%
Run 4: 4:20 4:35 faster than 63%
Burpee broad jump: 7:23 6:43 faster than 38%
Run 5: 4:26 4:39 faster than 63%
Row: 5:29 5:34 faster than 58%
Run 6: 4:19 4:37 faster than 66%
Farmers carry: 2:37 2:11 faster than 22%
Run 7: 4:26 4:36 faster than 60%
Sandbag lunges: 5:50 5:02 faster than 29%
Run 8: 6:01 6:33 faster than 69%
Wall balls: 10:06 6:49 faster than 14%
Roxzone: 12:28 13:10 faster than 62%
Runs (8 km) 35:35 37:29 faster than 64%
Stations (8) 46:06
Finish 1:34:05 1:31:10 1675th of 2,921 · faster than 42%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team U29, with Mia Williams 1:30:09 593rd of 857; 225th of 317 aged U29 52:51 30:38 6:49 Runs 52:51 · Stations 30:38 · Roxzone 6:49

593rd of 857 Doubles Women (faster than 30%).

Amber Ryan at HYROX Manchester 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 857 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 857 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:49 4:23 faster than 25%
SkiErg: 4:58 4:33 faster than 8%
Run 2: 6:25 5:59 faster than 32%
Sled push: 1:50 1:41 faster than 29%
Run 3: 6:52 6:16 faster than 27%
Sled pull: 3:30 3:50 faster than 71%
Run 4: 6:59 6:21 faster than 27%
Burpee broad jump: 5:20 4:01 faster than 14%
Run 5: 6:49 6:24 faster than 35%
Row: 4:59 5:03 faster than 59%
Run 6: 6:59 6:22 faster than 28%
Farmers carry: 1:41 1:50 faster than 72%
Run 7: 7:11 6:22 faster than 22%
Sandbag lunges: 3:56 3:33 faster than 31%
Run 8: 6:50 6:20 faster than 32%
Wall balls: 4:24 4:04 faster than 30%
Roxzone: 6:49 7:08 faster than 59%
Runs (8 km) 52:51 48:51 faster than 30%
Stations (8) 30:38
Finish 1:30:09 1:24:05 593rd of 857 · faster than 30%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. † This venue did not time the roxzone: the figure is the finish minus runs and stations, and part of the walk is inside the run laps there, so it is shorter than at other venues. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Open Women

The fastest Amber has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 5:13 Glasgow 2026 · best of 2 5:16
Sled push 2:50 Glasgow 2026 · best of 2 2:55
Sled pull 5:20 Glasgow 2026 · best of 2 5:47
Burpee broad jump 6:56 Glasgow 2026 · best of 2 6:46
Row 5:29 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 5:31
Farmers carry 2:37 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 2:19
Sandbag lunges 5:30 Glasgow 2026 · best of 2 5:13
Wall balls 10:06 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 6:43
Runs (8 km) 35:35 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 46:44
Roxzone 5:30 Glasgow 2026 · best of 2 7:57
How to read

Each station's best across Amber's Open Women races, from different races, against the typical Open Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

2 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Women race

London ExCeL 2025, against 2,921 Open Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Amberedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Amber sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Runs (faster than 64% of the field), weakest on Wall balls (faster than 15%).

See the numbers
Part Amber: faster than
Ski 34%
Push 44%
Pull 33%
BBJ 39%
Row 58%
Carry 23%
Lunges 29%
Wall balls 15%
Roxzone 62%
Runs 64%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 34%
Sled push faster than 44%
Sled pull faster than 33%
Burpee broad jump faster than 39%
Row faster than 58%
Farmers carry faster than 23%
Sandbag lunges faster than 29%
Wall balls faster than 15%
Roxzone faster than 62%
Runs (8 km) faster than 64%

How much of the field Amber beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (faster than 64%); weakest: Wall balls (faster than 15%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:11 slower
Sled push 0:05 slower
Sled pull 0:32 slower
Burpee broad jump 0:40 slower
Row 0:05 faster
Farmers carry 0:26 slower
Sandbag lunges 0:48 slower
Wall balls 3:17 slower
Roxzone 0:42 faster
Runs (8 km) 1:54 faster

Amber's time on each part against the typical Open Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (1:54 faster); weakest: Wall balls (3:17 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Amber against the typical Open Women finisher

Amber1:34:05
3:485:444:082:514:106:064:207:234:265:294:192:374:265:506:0110:0612:28
Typical Open Women1:30:51
3:395:334:202:464:305:344:356:434:395:344:372:114:365:026:336:4913:10
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Amber: 35:38 running, 46:05 at the stations and 12:28 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (10:06).Below, Typical Open Women: 37:29 running, 40:12 at the stations and 13:10 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (6:49).

See the numbers
Part Amber Typical Open Women
Run 1 3:48 3:39
SkiErg 5:44 5:33
Run 2 4:08 4:20
Sled push 2:51 2:46
Run 3 4:10 4:30
Sled pull 6:06 5:34
Run 4 4:20 4:35
Burpee broad jump 7:23 6:43
Run 5 4:26 4:39
Row 5:29 5:34
Run 6 4:19 4:37
Farmers carry 2:37 2:11
Run 7 4:26 4:36
Sandbag lunges 5:50 5:02
Run 8 6:01 6:33
Wall balls 10:06 6:49
Roxzone 12:28 13:10
Finish 1:34:05 1:31:10

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Wall balls cost 3:17 against the typical Open Women finisher at London ExCeL 2025. The wall balls guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix wall balls. Then beat 1:34:05.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report