Athlete · Open Women · 25-29 · NED NED

Lu-Anne Gerner

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/lu-anne-gerner-cb4e072c

7 HYROX races over 3 seasons: 5 solo, 2 in a team with 1 partner.

Best Open Women time1:13:40Maastricht 2026
Best Open Women place37thof 1,072 · Maastricht 2026
Latest race1:13:40Maastricht 2026 · Open WomenLu-Anne's best Open Women time so far
Strongest part of the raceSandbag lungesfaster than 99% of Open Women at Maastricht 2026
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Finish time, race by race: one race type at a time

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:15:001:20:001:25:001:30:001:35:00 best 1:13:40 best 1:13:40 · Maastricht

This line shows the finish time of Lu-Anne Gerner at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:13:40 at Maastricht (Sep 2026); Lu-Anne Gerner was 24:05 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Rotterdam Feb 2025 Open Women 1:37:45
Heerenveen May 2025 Open Women 1:33:05
Amsterdam Jan 2026 Open Women 1:19:12
Rotterdam Apr 2026 Open Women 1:15:13
Maastricht Sep 2026 Open Women 1:13:40

Each dot is one Open Women race; click one for that race's report. From the first Open Women race to the best: 24:05 faster (1:37:45 to 1:13:40).

Every race

7 results at 7 races

Tap a result for its full report
Open Women, 25-29 1:13:40 37th of 1,072; 12th of 279 aged 25-29 37:21 30:40 5:43 Runs 37:21 · Stations 30:40 · Roxzone 5:43

37th of 1,072 Open Women (faster than 96%). Against the 32 who finished around 1:14:58: most time gained on sandbag lunges (0:47), most lost on the eight runs (0:42). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:48 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:59 more).

Lu-Anne Gerner at HYROX Maastricht 2026, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,072 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,072 Open Women here
Run 1: 3:24 4:18 faster than 92%
SkiErg: 4:47 5:09 faster than 89%
Run 2: 4:21 5:38 faster than 96%
Sled push: 2:31 2:57 faster than 81%
Run 3: 4:56 5:58 faster than 90%
Sled pull: 4:54 5:22 faster than 65%
Run 4: 5:08 6:00 faster than 84%
Burpee broad jump: 4:21 7:01 faster than 97%
Run 5: 4:51 6:03 faster than 93%
Row: 5:07 5:30 faster than 85%
Run 6: 4:46 5:57 faster than 93%
Farmers carry: 1:50 2:23 faster than 93%
Run 7: 4:47 5:57 faster than 93%
Sandbag lunges: 2:55 5:07 fastest in the field
Run 8: 5:13 6:31 faster than 92%
Wall balls: 4:15 6:42 faster than 96%
Roxzone: 5:43 8:26 faster than 98%
Runs (8 km) 37:21 46:29 faster than 92%
Stations (8) 30:40
Finish 1:13:40 1:35:36 37th of 1,072 · faster than 96%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Esmee Gulikers 1:09:44 70th of 1,497; 34th of 388 aged 25-29 40:25 22:55 6:30 Runs 40:25 · Stations 22:55 · Roxzone 6:30

70th of 1,497 Doubles Women (faster than 95%). Against the 45 who finished around 1:09:57: most time gained on burpee broad jump (1:10), most lost on the eight runs (2:28). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:54 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:03 more).

Lu-Anne Gerner at HYROX Heerenveen 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,497 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,497 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:54 5:34 faster than 80%
SkiErg: 4:22 4:37 faster than 86%
Run 2: 4:48 5:41 faster than 88%
Sled push: 1:22 1:42 faster than 94%
Run 3: 4:57 5:52 faster than 90%
Sled pull: 2:50 3:40 faster than 96%
Run 4: 5:08 5:56 faster than 85%
Burpee broad jump: 2:13 4:28 fastest in the field
Run 5: 5:07 6:03 faster than 88%
Row: 4:45 5:06 faster than 88%
Run 6: 4:58 5:57 faster than 90%
Farmers carry: 1:29 1:50 faster than 94%
Run 7: 5:11 5:59 faster than 86%
Sandbag lunges: 2:25 3:38 faster than 97%
Run 8: 5:25 6:23 faster than 87%
Wall balls: 3:29 4:16 faster than 96%
Roxzone: 6:30 8:29 faster than 94%
Runs (8 km) 40:25 47:37 faster than 88%
Stations (8) 22:55
Finish 1:09:44 1:25:44 70th of 1,497 · faster than 95%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 25-29 1:15:13 75th of 1,879; 24th of 478 aged 25-29 39:00 30:57 5:20 Runs 39:00 · Stations 30:57 · Roxzone 5:20

75th of 1,879 Open Women (faster than 96%). Against the 58 who finished around 1:16:12: most time gained on the roxzone (0:34), most lost on the eight runs (1:14). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:46 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:12 more).

Lu-Anne Gerner at HYROX Rotterdam 2026, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,879 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,879 Open Women here
Run 1: 4:49 5:39 faster than 84%
SkiErg: 4:58 5:27 faster than 91%
Run 2: 4:34 5:28 faster than 88%
Sled push: 2:14 2:41 faster than 81%
Run 3: 4:53 5:46 faster than 86%
Sled pull: 4:03 5:15 faster than 91%
Run 4: 4:53 5:51 faster than 88%
Burpee broad jump: 4:39 7:04 faster than 95%
Run 5: 4:49 5:54 faster than 91%
Row: 4:57 5:29 faster than 92%
Run 6: 4:46 5:51 faster than 92%
Farmers carry: 2:09 2:20 faster than 69%
Run 7: 4:52 5:54 faster than 89%
Sandbag lunges: 3:21 5:11 faster than 97%
Run 8: 5:27 6:57 faster than 92%
Wall balls: 4:36 6:54 faster than 94%
Roxzone: 5:20 8:01 faster than 97%
Runs (8 km) 39:00 47:37 faster than 90%
Stations (8) 30:57
Finish 1:15:13 1:36:50 75th of 1,879 · faster than 96%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 25-29 1:19:12 225th of 1,697; 66th of 431 aged 25-29 41:50 31:30 5:56 Runs 41:50 · Stations 31:30 · Roxzone 5:56

225th of 1,697 Open Women (faster than 86%). Against the 52 who finished around 1:19:48: most time gained on wall balls (1:00), most lost on the eight runs (2:09). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:13 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:01 more).

Lu-Anne Gerner at HYROX Amsterdam 2026, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,697 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,697 Open Women here
Run 1: 4:14 4:27 faster than 63%
SkiErg: 5:07 5:05 faster than 47%
Run 2: 5:09 5:32 faster than 70%
Sled push: 2:25 2:49 faster than 80%
Run 3: 5:11 5:45 faster than 78%
Sled pull: 4:26 5:22 faster than 86%
Run 4: 5:16 5:48 faster than 74%
Burpee broad jump: 4:35 6:25 faster than 91%
Run 5: 5:36 5:55 faster than 64%
Row: 5:03 5:18 faster than 77%
Run 6: 5:15 5:50 faster than 76%
Farmers carry: 1:56 2:06 faster than 73%
Run 7: 5:24 5:46 faster than 69%
Sandbag lunges: 3:37 4:59 faster than 93%
Run 8: 5:48 6:34 faster than 77%
Wall balls: 4:21 6:39 faster than 96%
Roxzone: 5:56 7:21 faster than 85%
Runs (8 km) 41:50 45:42 faster than 73%
Stations (8) 31:30
Finish 1:19:12 1:32:22 225th of 1,697 · faster than 86%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 16-24, with Esmee Gulikers 1:23:50 440th of 1,069; 95th of 266 aged 16-24 48:49 26:05 9:01 Runs 48:49 · Stations 26:05 · Roxzone 9:01

440th of 1,069 Doubles Women (faster than 58%). Against the 32 who finished around 1:23:41: most time gained on sandbag lunges (0:47), most lost on the roxzone (1:34). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:55 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:23 more).

Lu-Anne Gerner at HYROX Maastricht 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,069 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,069 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:42 5:56 faster than 62%
SkiErg: 4:22 4:40 faster than 87%
Run 2: 5:30 5:45 faster than 61%
Sled push: 1:36 1:38 faster than 58%
Run 3: 5:49 5:57 faster than 57%
Sled pull: 3:29 4:05 faster than 85%
Run 4: 5:58 6:02 faster than 52%
Burpee broad jump: 3:38 4:15 faster than 76%
Run 5: 6:25 6:15 faster than 42%
Row: 5:02 5:04 faster than 54%
Run 6: 6:20 6:09 faster than 40%
Farmers carry: 1:37 1:50 faster than 82%
Run 7: 6:25 6:07 faster than 36%
Sandbag lunges: 2:47 3:45 faster than 95%
Run 8: 6:44 6:29 faster than 41%
Wall balls: 3:34 4:25 faster than 97%
Roxzone: 9:01 7:48 faster than 26%
Runs (8 km) 48:49 48:48 faster than 49%
Stations (8) 26:05
Finish 1:23:50 1:26:46 440th of 1,069 · faster than 58%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 16-24 1:33:05 346th of 754; 59th of 140 aged 16-24 44:46 38:56 9:27 Runs 44:46 · Stations 38:56 · Roxzone 9:27

346th of 754 Open Women (faster than 54%).

Lu-Anne Gerner at HYROX Heerenveen 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 754 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 754 Open Women here
Run 1: 5:01 5:06 faster than 55%
SkiErg: 5:06 5:02 faster than 43%
Run 2: 5:10 5:21 faster than 60%
Sled push: 3:09 2:36 faster than 18%
Run 3: 5:42 5:36 faster than 45%
Sled pull: 6:19 5:36 faster than 28%
Run 4: 5:30 5:39 faster than 59%
Burpee broad jump: 6:06 7:07 faster than 71%
Run 5: 5:55 5:54 faster than 48%
Row: 5:37 5:23 faster than 31%
Run 6: 5:37 5:45 faster than 57%
Farmers carry: 3:03 2:16 faster than 9%
Run 7: 5:48 5:47 faster than 49%
Sandbag lunges: 4:19 5:06 faster than 78%
Run 8: 6:07 6:33 faster than 64%
Wall balls: 5:17 5:56 faster than 67%
Roxzone: 9:27 9:20 faster than 48%
Runs (8 km) 44:46 45:49 faster than 56%
Stations (8) 38:56
Finish 1:33:05 1:34:46 346th of 754 · faster than 54%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 16-24 1:37:45 654th of 1,119; 115th of 225 aged 16-24 47:53 40:35 9:21 Runs 47:53 · Stations 40:35 · Roxzone 9:21

654th of 1,119 Open Women (faster than 41%). Against the 35 who finished around 1:38:32: most time gained on the eight runs (1:52), most lost on the roxzone (1:36). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:21 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:27 more).

Lu-Anne Gerner at HYROX Rotterdam 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,119 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,119 Open Women here
Run 1: 5:33 5:53 faster than 65%
SkiErg: 5:04 5:04 faster than 51%
Run 2: 5:52 5:37 faster than 37%
Sled push: 3:23 2:34 faster than 10%
Run 3: 6:01 5:53 faster than 44%
Sled pull: 6:45 5:38 faster than 23%
Run 4: 5:52 5:57 faster than 53%
Burpee broad jump: 5:54 6:52 faster than 69%
Run 5: 6:00 6:08 faster than 55%
Row: 5:47 5:18 faster than 14%
Run 6: 5:52 5:57 faster than 54%
Farmers carry: 2:49 2:12 faster than 12%
Run 7: 5:57 5:55 faster than 48%
Sandbag lunges: 4:55 5:02 faster than 54%
Run 8: 6:51 6:35 faster than 41%
Wall balls: 5:58 5:44 faster than 43%
Roxzone: 9:21 7:17 faster than 20%
Runs (8 km) 47:53 48:08 faster than 51%
Stations (8) 40:35
Finish 1:37:45 1:34:28 654th of 1,119 · faster than 41%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group.

Best splits · Open Women

The fastest Lu-Anne has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:47 Maastricht 2026 · best of 5 5:16
Sled push 2:14 Rotterdam 2026 · best of 5 2:55
Sled pull 4:03 Rotterdam 2026 · best of 5 5:47
Burpee broad jump 4:21 Maastricht 2026 · best of 5 6:46
Row 4:57 Rotterdam 2026 · best of 5 5:31
Farmers carry 1:50 Maastricht 2026 · best of 5 2:19
Sandbag lunges 2:55 Maastricht 2026 · best of 5 5:13
Wall balls 4:15 Maastricht 2026 · best of 5 6:43
Runs (8 km) 37:21 Maastricht 2026 · best of 5 46:44
Roxzone 5:20 Rotterdam 2026 · best of 5 7:57
How to read

Each station's best across Lu-Anne's Open Women races, from different races, against the typical Open Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

1 team partner

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Women race

Maastricht 2026, against 1,072 Open Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Lu-Anneedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Lu-Anne sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Lunges (faster than 99% of the field), weakest on Pull (faster than 66%).

See the numbers
Part Lu-Anne: faster than
Ski 90%
Push 81%
Pull 66%
BBJ 97%
Row 85%
Carry 94%
Lunges 99%
Wall balls 97%
Roxzone 98%
Runs 92%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 90%
Sled push faster than 81%
Sled pull faster than 66%
Burpee broad jump faster than 97%
Row faster than 85%
Farmers carry faster than 94%
Sandbag lunges faster than 99%
Wall balls faster than 97%
Roxzone faster than 98%
Runs (8 km) faster than 92%

How much of the field Lu-Anne beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Sandbag lunges (faster than 99%); weakest: Sled pull (faster than 66%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:22 faster
Sled push 0:26 faster
Sled pull 0:28 faster
Burpee broad jump 2:40 faster
Row 0:23 faster
Farmers carry 0:33 faster
Sandbag lunges 2:12 faster
Wall balls 2:27 faster
Roxzone 2:43 faster
Runs (8 km) 9:08 faster

Lu-Anne's time on each part against the typical Open Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (9:08 faster); weakest: SkiErg (0:22 faster).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Lu-Anne against the typical Open Women finisher

Lu-Anne1:13:40
3:244:474:212:314:564:545:084:214:515:074:461:504:472:555:134:155:43
Typical Open Women1:34:59
4:185:095:382:575:585:226:007:016:035:305:572:235:575:076:316:428:26
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Lu-Anne: 37:26 running, 30:40 at the stations and 5:43 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:07).Below, Typical Open Women: 46:22 running, 40:11 at the stations and 8:26 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (7:01).

See the numbers
Part Lu-Anne Typical Open Women
Run 1 3:24 4:18
SkiErg 4:47 5:09
Run 2 4:21 5:38
Sled push 2:31 2:57
Run 3 4:56 5:58
Sled pull 4:54 5:22
Run 4 5:08 6:00
Burpee broad jump 4:21 7:01
Run 5 4:51 6:03
Row 5:07 5:30
Run 6 4:46 5:57
Farmers carry 1:50 2:23
Run 7 4:47 5:57
Sandbag lunges 2:55 5:07
Run 8 5:13 6:31
Wall balls 4:15 6:42
Roxzone 5:43 8:26
Finish 1:13:40 1:35:36

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Training for the next one? Let's beat 1:13:40.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report