Athlete · Doubles Men · team 25-29 · GBR GBR

Jordan O’Hanlon

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/jordan-o-hanlon-t-e9f4e4

4 HYROX races over 2 seasons, all in a team with 4 partners. Best Doubles Men time: 1:03:36 at Glasgow 2025.

Best Doubles Men time1:03:36Glasgow 2025
Best Doubles Men place287thof 1,528 · Glasgow 2026
Latest race1:04:34Glasgow 2026 · Doubles Men with Morgan Denison0:58 slower than Jordan's best Doubles Men time (1:03:36)
Strongest part of the raceSkiErgfaster than 95% of Doubles Men at Glasgow 2025

Doubles Men: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:04:001:05:001:06:00 best 1:03:36

This line shows the finish time of Jordan O’Hanlon at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:03:36 at Glasgow (Mar 2025); Jordan O’Hanlon was 1:31 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Birmingham Oct 2024 Doubles Men 1:06:05
Glasgow Mar 2025 Doubles Men 1:03:36
Manchester Jan 2026 Doubles Men 1:04:51
Glasgow Mar 2026 Doubles Men 1:04:34

Each dot is one Doubles Men race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Men races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

4 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Men, team 25-29, with Morgan Denison 1:04:34 287th of 1,528; 67th of 260 aged 25-29 37:07 23:44 3:47 Runs 37:07 · Stations 23:44 · Roxzone 3:47

287th of 1,528 Doubles Men (faster than 81%). Against the 43 who finished around 1:04:36: most time gained on sled pull (0:30), most lost on sandbag lunges (0:38). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:40 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:12 more).

Jordan O’Hanlon at HYROX Glasgow 2026, Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 1,528 Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,528 Doubles Men here
Run 1: 4:23 4:58 faster than 79%
SkiErg: 3:43 4:01 faster than 93%
Run 2: 4:16 4:49 faster than 78%
Sled push: 1:33 1:50 faster than 88%
Run 3: 4:31 5:09 faster than 78%
Sled pull: 2:13 2:57 faster than 97%
Run 4: 4:35 5:09 faster than 76%
Burpee broad jump: 2:53 3:07 faster than 64%
Run 5: 4:48 5:19 faster than 72%
Row: 4:05 4:34 faster than 96%
Run 6: 4:41 5:15 faster than 75%
Farmers carry: 1:31 1:41 faster than 78%
Run 7: 4:41 5:15 faster than 76%
Sandbag lunges: 3:49 3:32 faster than 38%
Run 8: 5:15 5:54 faster than 75%
Wall balls: 3:57 4:33 faster than 86%
Roxzone: 3:47 4:24 faster than 70%
Runs (8 km) 37:07 42:03 faster than 78%
Stations (8) 23:44
Finish 1:04:34 1:13:38 287th of 1,528 · faster than 81%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Men, team 30-34, with Tom Kilifin 1:04:51 320th of 1,596; 98th of 398 aged 30-34 35:49 24:29 4:38 Runs 35:49 · Stations 24:29 · Roxzone 4:38

320th of 1,596 Doubles Men (faster than 80%). Against the 48 who finished around 1:04:51: most time gained on sled pull (0:35), most lost on the roxzone (0:41). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:00 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:34 more).

Jordan O’Hanlon at HYROX Manchester 2026, Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 1,596 Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,596 Doubles Men here
Run 1: 3:12 3:40 faster than 77%
SkiErg: 3:44 3:53 faster than 77%
Run 2: 4:27 5:06 faster than 83%
Sled push: 1:32 1:42 faster than 76%
Run 3: 4:37 5:27 faster than 87%
Sled pull: 2:21 3:07 faster than 95%
Run 4: 4:40 5:30 faster than 87%
Burpee broad jump: 3:17 3:20 faster than 53%
Run 5: 4:56 5:40 faster than 80%
Row: 4:14 4:25 faster than 75%
Run 6: 4:56 5:36 faster than 78%
Farmers carry: 1:44 1:40 faster than 40%
Run 7: 5:00 5:37 faster than 77%
Sandbag lunges: 3:30 3:39 faster than 58%
Run 8: 4:04 4:39 faster than 76%
Wall balls: 4:07 4:20 faster than 63%
Roxzone: 4:38 4:45 faster than 53%
Runs (8 km) 35:49 41:35 faster than 82%
Stations (8) 24:29
Finish 1:04:51 1:12:48 320th of 1,596 · faster than 80%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Men, team U29, with Jake Spedding 1:03:36 461st of 2,052; 180th of 627 aged U29 36:35 23:21 3:43 Runs 36:35 · Stations 23:21 · Roxzone 3:43

461st of 2,052 Doubles Men (faster than 77%). Against the 61 who finished around 1:02:59: most time gained on sled pull (0:24), most lost on the eight runs (0:46). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:07 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:55 more).

Jordan O’Hanlon at HYROX Glasgow 2025, Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 2,052 Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,052 Doubles Men here
Run 1: 3:08 3:42 faster than 85%
SkiErg: 3:34 3:52 faster than 94%
Run 2: 4:30 5:06 faster than 81%
Sled push: 1:32 1:44 faster than 81%
Run 3: 4:45 5:24 faster than 79%
Sled pull: 2:15 2:54 faster than 92%
Run 4: 4:53 5:23 faster than 74%
Burpee broad jump: 2:34 3:03 faster than 77%
Run 5: 5:18 5:34 faster than 61%
Row: 4:13 4:23 faster than 72%
Run 6: 5:00 5:29 faster than 72%
Farmers carry: 1:25 1:33 faster than 76%
Run 7: 5:12 5:33 faster than 65%
Sandbag lunges: 3:33 3:24 faster than 42%
Run 8: 3:53 4:24 faster than 75%
Wall balls: 4:15 4:17 faster than 52%
Roxzone: 3:43 4:24 faster than 80%
Runs (8 km) 36:35 41:01 faster than 75%
Stations (8) 23:21
Finish 1:03:36 1:10:48 461st of 2,052 · faster than 77%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Men, team U29, with Elliot Owens 1:06:05 308th of 1,317; 114th of 332 aged U29 36:04 24:11 5:55 Runs 36:04 · Stations 24:11 · Roxzone 5:55

308th of 1,317 Doubles Men (faster than 76%). Against the 42 who finished around 1:06:25: most time gained on the eight runs (0:38), most lost on wall balls (0:52). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:20 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:15 more).

Jordan O’Hanlon at HYROX Birmingham 2024, Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 1,317 Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,317 Doubles Men here
Run 1: 4:53 5:24 faster than 76%
SkiErg: 3:38 3:54 faster than 93%
Run 2: 4:16 4:37 faster than 74%
Sled push: 1:40 1:44 faster than 61%
Run 3: 4:22 4:55 faster than 80%
Sled pull: 2:50 3:00 faster than 63%
Run 4: 4:23 4:58 faster than 81%
Burpee broad jump: 2:09 3:03 faster than 94%
Run 5: 4:36 5:05 faster than 75%
Row: 4:21 4:23 faster than 54%
Run 6: 4:29 5:00 faster than 79%
Farmers carry: 1:28 1:35 faster than 70%
Run 7: 4:31 5:01 faster than 77%
Sandbag lunges: 3:20 3:19 faster than 49%
Run 8: 4:38 5:13 faster than 78%
Wall balls: 4:45 4:08 faster than 19%
Roxzone: 5:55 6:42 faster than 73%
Runs (8 km) 36:04 40:19 faster than 79%
Stations (8) 24:11
Finish 1:06:05 1:12:25 308th of 1,317 · faster than 76%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group.

Best splits · Doubles Men

The fastest Jordan has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 3:34 Glasgow 2025 · best of 4 4:04
Sled push 1:32 Manchester 2026 · best of 4 1:51
Sled pull 2:13 Glasgow 2026 · best of 4 3:21
Burpee broad jump 2:09 Birmingham 2024 · best of 4 3:14
Row 4:05 Glasgow 2026 · best of 4 4:32
Farmers carry 1:25 Glasgow 2025 · best of 4 1:40
Sandbag lunges 3:20 Birmingham 2024 · best of 4 3:36
Wall balls 3:57 Glasgow 2026 · best of 4 4:23
Runs (8 km) 35:49 Manchester 2026 · best of 4 42:20
Roxzone 3:43 Glasgow 2025 · best of 4 6:43
How to read

Each station's best across Jordan's Doubles Men races, from different races, against the typical Doubles Men split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

4 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Doubles Men race

Glasgow 2025, against 2,052 Doubles Men

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Jordanedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Jordan sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Ski (faster than 95% of the field), weakest on Lunges (faster than 42%).

See the numbers
Part Jordan: faster than
Ski 95%
Push 82%
Pull 92%
BBJ 77%
Row 73%
Carry 76%
Lunges 42%
Wall balls 53%
Roxzone 80%
Runs 76%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 95%
Sled push faster than 82%
Sled pull faster than 92%
Burpee broad jump faster than 77%
Row faster than 73%
Farmers carry faster than 76%
Sandbag lunges faster than 42%
Wall balls faster than 53%
Roxzone faster than 80%
Runs (8 km) faster than 76%

How much of the field Jordan beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: SkiErg (faster than 95%); weakest: Sandbag lunges (faster than 42%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:18 faster
Sled push 0:12 faster
Sled pull 0:39 faster
Burpee broad jump 0:29 faster
Row 0:10 faster
Farmers carry 0:08 faster
Sandbag lunges 0:09 slower
Wall balls 0:02 faster
Roxzone 0:41 faster
Runs (8 km) 4:26 faster

Jordan's time on each part against the typical Doubles Men finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (4:26 faster); weakest: Sandbag lunges (0:09 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Doubles Men finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Jordan against the typical Doubles Men finisher

Jordan1:03:36
3:083:344:301:324:452:154:532:345:184:135:001:255:123:333:534:153:43
Typical Doubles Men1:10:09
3:423:525:061:445:242:545:233:035:344:235:291:335:333:244:244:174:24
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Jordan: 36:38 running, 23:22 at the stations and 3:43 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (4:15).Below, Typical Doubles Men: 40:35 running, 25:10 at the stations and 4:24 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (4:23).

See the numbers
Part Jordan Typical Doubles Men
Run 1 3:08 3:42
SkiErg 3:34 3:52
Run 2 4:30 5:06
Sled push 1:32 1:44
Run 3 4:45 5:24
Sled pull 2:15 2:54
Run 4 4:53 5:23
Burpee broad jump 2:34 3:03
Run 5 5:18 5:34
Row 4:13 4:23
Run 6 5:00 5:29
Farmers carry 1:25 1:33
Run 7 5:12 5:33
Sandbag lunges 3:33 3:24
Run 8 3:53 4:24
Wall balls 4:15 4:17
Roxzone 3:43 4:24
Finish 1:03:36 1:10:48

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Training for the next one? Let's beat 1:03:36.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report