Athlete · Doubles Women · team 25-29 · GBR GBR

Isley Joseph

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/isley-joseph-t-df581b

4 HYROX races over 1 season, all in a team with 3 partners.

Best Doubles Women time1:13:53Manchester 2026
Best Doubles Women place200thof 1,546 · Manchester 2026
Latest race1:22:28London Olympia 2026 · Doubles Women with Amber-Lee Downie8:35 slower than Isley's best Doubles Women time (1:13:53)
Strongest part of the raceRuns (8 km)faster than 88% of Doubles Women at Manchester 2026
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:14:001:16:001:18:001:20:001:22:001:24:00 best 1:13:53 best 1:13:53 · Manchester

This line shows the finish time of Isley Joseph at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:13:53 at Manchester (Jan 2026); Isley Joseph was 3:14 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Valencia Oct 2025 Doubles Women 1:25:42
Manchester Jan 2026 Doubles Women 1:13:53
London Olympia Mar 2026 Doubles Women 1:22:28

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

4 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Amber-Lee Downie 1:22:28 896th of 2,211; 232nd of 470 aged 25-29 48:15 28:27 5:52 Runs 48:15 · Stations 28:27 · Roxzone 5:52

896th of 2,211 Doubles Women (faster than 59%). Against the 65 who finished around 1:22:16: most time gained on wall balls (0:27), most lost on the eight runs (1:50). Runs 5 to 8 took 7:48 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:35 more).

Isley Joseph at HYROX London Olympia 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,211 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,211 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:59 5:44 faster than 83%
SkiErg: 4:42 4:40 faster than 47%
Run 2: 4:46 5:27 faster than 84%
Sled push: 1:41 1:51 faster than 75%
Run 3: 5:17 5:40 faster than 69%
Sled pull: 3:19 3:51 faster than 82%
Run 4: 5:13 5:42 faster than 73%
Burpee broad jump: 4:12 4:21 faster than 55%
Run 5: 5:31 5:50 faster than 64%
Row: 5:17 5:08 faster than 36%
Run 6: 5:23 5:47 faster than 68%
Farmers carry: 1:32 1:55 faster than 95%
Run 7: 5:22 5:46 faster than 69%
Sandbag lunges: 3:51 3:49 faster than 49%
Run 8: 11:47 7:52 faster than 7%
Wall balls: 3:53 4:37 faster than 88%
Roxzone: 5:52 6:17 faster than 64%
Runs (8 km) 48:15 48:15 faster than 50%
Stations (8) 28:27
Finish 1:22:28 1:25:16 896th of 2,211 · faster than 59%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Montana Cameron 1:13:53 200th of 1,546; 62nd of 325 aged 25-29 41:38 27:35 4:43 Runs 41:38 · Stations 27:35 · Roxzone 4:43

200th of 1,546 Doubles Women (faster than 87%). Against the 48 who finished around 1:14:31: most time gained on the eight runs (0:53), most lost on sandbag lunges (0:12). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:26 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:09 more).

Isley Joseph at HYROX Manchester 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,546 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,546 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 3:18 4:32 faster than 96%
SkiErg: 4:20 4:37 faster than 85%
Run 2: 5:15 6:17 faster than 87%
Sled push: 1:30 1:44 faster than 87%
Run 3: 5:55 6:33 faster than 73%
Sled pull: 3:40 4:03 faster than 72%
Run 4: 5:40 6:38 faster than 83%
Burpee broad jump: 3:56 4:28 faster than 69%
Run 5: 5:48 6:44 faster than 83%
Row: 5:02 5:07 faster than 60%
Run 6: 5:36 6:42 faster than 87%
Farmers carry: 1:40 1:54 faster than 81%
Run 7: 5:40 6:43 faster than 85%
Sandbag lunges: 3:32 3:49 faster than 65%
Run 8: 4:30 5:31 faster than 87%
Wall balls: 3:55 4:21 faster than 76%
Roxzone: 4:43 6:04 faster than 80%
Runs (8 km) 41:38 50:04 faster than 87%
Stations (8) 27:35
Finish 1:13:53 1:26:49 200th of 1,546 · faster than 87%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Tasha Dennis 1:19:58 299th of 561; 78th of 126 aged 25-29 33:45* 34:57* 11:20 Runs 33:45 · Stations 34:57 · Roxzone 11:20

299th of 561 Pro Doubles Women (faster than 46%).

Isley Joseph at HYROX London ExCeL 2025, Pro Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 561 Pro Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 561 Pro Doubles Women here
Run 1: 3:11 3:29 faster than 72%
SkiErg: 4:50 4:50 faster than 51%
Run 2: 3:56 4:07 faster than 60%
Sled push: 2:39 2:24 faster than 27%
Run 3: 4:02 4:18 faster than 69%
Sled pull: 4:26 4:42 faster than 62%
Run 4: 4:08 4:19 faster than 64%
Burpee broad jump: 4:16 3:48 faster than 30%
Run 5: 4:15 4:21 faster than 57%
Row: 5:12 5:00 faster than 31%
Run 6: 4:09 4:24 faster than 64%
Farmers carry: 1:48 1:54 faster than 69%
Run 7: 4:17 4:24 faster than 56%
Sandbag lunges: 4:48 4:08 faster than 26%
Run 8: 5:51 6:04 faster than 59%
Wall balls: 6:58 4:26 faster than 7%
Roxzone: 11:20 11:51 faster than 60%
Runs (8 km) 33:45 35:39 faster than 64%
Stations (8) 34:57
Finish 1:19:58 1:19:08 299th of 561 · faster than 46%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Tasha Dennis 1:25:42 354th of 770; 102nd of 209 aged 25-29 46:44 32:05 6:58 Runs 46:44 · Stations 32:05 · Roxzone 6:58

354th of 770 Doubles Women (faster than 54%).

Isley Joseph at HYROX Valencia 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 770 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 770 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 7:16 6:11 faster than 13%
SkiErg: 4:41 4:51 faster than 74%
Run 2: 5:28 5:44 faster than 66%
Sled push: 2:05 2:00 faster than 38%
Run 3: 5:37 6:01 faster than 73%
Sled pull: 4:06 4:23 faster than 68%
Run 4: 5:31 6:03 faster than 78%
Burpee broad jump: 4:54 4:05 faster than 21%
Run 5: 5:45 6:10 faster than 72%
Row: 5:09 5:07 faster than 48%
Run 6: 5:27 6:05 faster than 81%
Farmers carry: 2:02 1:56 faster than 34%
Run 7: 5:31 6:05 faster than 78%
Sandbag lunges: 4:18 3:48 faster than 25%
Run 8: 6:11 6:29 faster than 62%
Wall balls: 4:50 4:13 faster than 21%
Roxzone: 6:58 6:52 faster than 47%
Runs (8 km) 46:44 49:05 faster than 65%
Stations (8) 32:05
Finish 1:25:42 1:27:00 354th of 770 · faster than 54%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Doubles Women

The fastest Isley has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:20 Manchester 2026 · best of 3 4:49
Sled push 1:30 Manchester 2026 · best of 3 1:52
Sled pull 3:19 London Olympia 2026 · best of 3 4:13
Burpee broad jump 3:56 Manchester 2026 · best of 3 4:18
Row 5:02 Manchester 2026 · best of 3 5:13
Farmers carry 1:32 London Olympia 2026 · best of 3 1:52
Sandbag lunges 3:32 Manchester 2026 · best of 3 3:47
Wall balls 3:53 London Olympia 2026 · best of 3 4:22
Runs (8 km) 41:38 Manchester 2026 · best of 3 49:17
Roxzone 4:43 Manchester 2026 · best of 3 7:46
How to read

Each station's best across Isley's Doubles Women races, from different races, against the typical Doubles Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

3 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Doubles Women race

Manchester 2026, against 1,546 Doubles Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Isleyedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Isley sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Runs (faster than 88% of the field), weakest on Row (faster than 60%).

See the numbers
Part Isley: faster than
Ski 86%
Push 87%
Pull 72%
BBJ 70%
Row 60%
Carry 81%
Lunges 65%
Wall balls 77%
Roxzone 80%
Runs 88%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 86%
Sled push faster than 87%
Sled pull faster than 72%
Burpee broad jump faster than 70%
Row faster than 60%
Farmers carry faster than 81%
Sandbag lunges faster than 65%
Wall balls faster than 77%
Roxzone faster than 80%
Runs (8 km) faster than 88%

How much of the field Isley beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (faster than 88%); weakest: Row (faster than 60%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:17 faster
Sled push 0:14 faster
Sled pull 0:23 faster
Burpee broad jump 0:32 faster
Row 0:05 faster
Farmers carry 0:14 faster
Sandbag lunges 0:17 faster
Wall balls 0:26 faster
Roxzone 1:21 faster
Runs (8 km) 8:26 faster

Isley's time on each part against the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (8:26 faster); weakest: Row (0:05 faster).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Isley against the typical Doubles Women finisher

Isley1:13:53
3:184:205:151:305:553:405:403:565:485:025:361:405:403:324:303:554:43
Typical Doubles Women1:25:47
4:324:376:171:446:334:036:384:286:445:076:421:546:433:495:314:216:04
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Isley: 41:43 running, 27:35 at the stations and 4:43 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:02) and the shortest the sled push (1:30).Below, Typical Doubles Women: 49:40 running, 30:03 at the stations and 6:04 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:07) and the shortest the sled push (1:44).

See the numbers
Part Isley Typical Doubles Women
Run 1 3:18 4:32
SkiErg 4:20 4:37
Run 2 5:15 6:17
Sled push 1:30 1:44
Run 3 5:55 6:33
Sled pull 3:40 4:03
Run 4 5:40 6:38
Burpee broad jump 3:56 4:28
Run 5 5:48 6:44
Row 5:02 5:07
Run 6 5:36 6:42
Farmers carry 1:40 1:54
Run 7 5:40 6:43
Sandbag lunges 3:32 3:49
Run 8 4:30 5:31
Wall balls 3:55 4:21
Roxzone 4:43 6:04
Finish 1:13:53 1:26:49

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Training for the next one? Let's beat 1:13:53.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report