Athlete · Open Women · 16-24 · NED NED

Fem Gelinck

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/fem-gelinck-69eccefd

6 HYROX races over 3 seasons: 1 solo, 5 in a team with 3 partners.

Open Women time1:29:06Maastricht Sep 2025
Open Women place299thof 939 · Maastricht Sep 2025
Latest race1:22:41Maastricht 2026 · Doubles Women with Bibi Frank13:37 slower than Fem's best Doubles Women time (1:09:04)
Strongest part of the raceRoxzonefaster than 89% of Open Women at Maastricht Sep 2025
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:10:001:15:001:20:001:25:00 best 1:09:04

This line shows the finish time of Fem Gelinck at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:09:04 at Heerenveen (May 2025); Fem Gelinck was 5:15 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Maastricht Feb 2025 Doubles Women 1:27:56
Mechelen Apr 2025 Doubles Women 1:13:31
Heerenveen May 2025 Doubles Women 1:09:04
Amsterdam Jan 2026 Doubles Women 1:11:19
Maastricht Sep 2026 Doubles Women 1:22:41

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

6 results at 6 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Women, team 16-24, with Bibi Frank 1:22:41 382nd of 1,366; 86th of 328 aged 16-24 45:13 31:00 6:33 Runs 45:13 · Stations 31:00 · Roxzone 6:33

382nd of 1,366 Doubles Women (faster than 72%). Against the 40 who finished around 1:23:21: most time gained on the roxzone (1:15), most lost on burpee broad jump (1:45). Runs 5 to 8 took 4:27 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:26 more).

Fem Gelinck at HYROX Maastricht 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,366 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,366 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 3:49 4:40 faster than 89%
SkiErg: 4:25 4:42 faster than 86%
Run 2: 5:11 6:00 faster than 84%
Sled push: 1:47 1:50 faster than 58%
Run 3: 5:35 6:17 faster than 80%
Sled pull: 4:14 4:08 faster than 44%
Run 4: 5:50 6:23 faster than 72%
Burpee broad jump: 5:50 4:45 faster than 21%
Run 5: 6:01 6:28 faster than 68%
Row: 4:55 5:14 faster than 83%
Run 6: 6:07 6:27 faster than 64%
Farmers carry: 1:56 1:55 faster than 48%
Run 7: 6:01 6:26 faster than 68%
Sandbag lunges: 3:28 3:50 faster than 69%
Run 8: 6:42 6:48 faster than 54%
Wall balls: 4:25 4:24 faster than 49%
Roxzone: 6:33 8:30 faster than 91%
Runs (8 km) 45:13 49:39 faster than 74%
Stations (8) 31:00
Finish 1:22:41 1:29:13 382nd of 1,366 · faster than 72%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 16-24, with Nina Ter Bogt 1:11:19 101st of 1,635; 18th of 347 aged 16-24 37:49 28:14 5:20 Runs 37:49 · Stations 28:14 · Roxzone 5:20

101st of 1,635 Doubles Women (faster than 93%). Against the 49 who finished around 1:10:46: most time gained on the eight runs (1:12), most lost on burpee broad jump (1:00). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:51 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:05 more).

Fem Gelinck at HYROX Amsterdam 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,635 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,635 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 3:35 4:45 faster than 97%
SkiErg: 4:20 4:38 faster than 88%
Run 2: 4:41 5:48 faster than 94%
Sled push: 1:58 1:50 faster than 29%
Run 3: 4:48 6:01 faster than 96%
Sled pull: 3:42 4:03 faster than 74%
Run 4: 4:56 6:03 faster than 94%
Burpee broad jump: 4:20 4:15 faster than 47%
Run 5: 4:50 6:11 faster than 97%
Row: 5:06 5:03 faster than 45%
Run 6: 4:53 6:10 faster than 96%
Farmers carry: 1:43 1:51 faster than 71%
Run 7: 4:51 6:08 faster than 96%
Sandbag lunges: 3:15 3:36 faster than 73%
Run 8: 5:17 6:42 faster than 95%
Wall balls: 3:50 4:21 faster than 83%
Roxzone: 5:20 7:19 faster than 96%
Runs (8 km) 37:49 47:57 faster than 96%
Stations (8) 28:14
Finish 1:11:19 1:25:19 101st of 1,635 · faster than 93%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Women, 16-24 1:29:06 299th of 939; 56th of 207 aged 16-24 42:02 40:53 6:15 Runs 42:02 · Stations 40:53 · Roxzone 6:15

299th of 939 Open Women (faster than 68%).

Fem Gelinck at HYROX Maastricht Sep 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 939 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 939 Open Women here
Run 1: 4:53 5:30 faster than 79%
SkiErg: 4:49 5:07 faster than 84%
Run 2: 4:47 5:30 faster than 81%
Sled push: 2:21 2:31 faster than 64%
Run 3: 5:12 5:44 faster than 74%
Sled pull: 5:59 5:44 faster than 41%
Run 4: 5:16 5:51 faster than 74%
Burpee broad jump: 7:43 6:50 faster than 34%
Run 5: 5:25 6:06 faster than 76%
Row: 5:06 5:22 faster than 76%
Run 6: 5:10 5:55 faster than 81%
Farmers carry: 1:58 2:12 faster than 78%
Run 7: 5:21 5:52 faster than 71%
Sandbag lunges: 4:55 5:06 faster than 56%
Run 8: 6:02 6:33 faster than 67%
Wall balls: 8:02 7:03 faster than 33%
Roxzone: 6:15 8:04 faster than 89%
Runs (8 km) 42:02 47:12 faster than 77%
Stations (8) 40:53
Finish 1:29:06 1:35:47 299th of 939 · faster than 68%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team U29, with Nina Ter Bogt 1:09:04 19th of 858; 8th of 403 aged U29 37:52 24:53 6:23 Runs 37:52 · Stations 24:53 · Roxzone 6:23

19th of 858 Doubles Women (faster than 97%).

Fem Gelinck at HYROX Heerenveen 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 858 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 858 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:21 5:29 faster than 95%
SkiErg: 4:12 4:37 faster than 97%
Run 2: 4:32 5:41 faster than 96%
Sled push: 1:29 1:41 faster than 85%
Run 3: 4:36 5:56 faster than 97%
Sled pull: 3:10 3:54 faster than 90%
Run 4: 4:45 6:02 faster than 96%
Burpee broad jump: 3:14 4:26 faster than 93%
Run 5: 4:54 6:13 faster than 95%
Row: 4:53 5:12 faster than 85%
Run 6: 4:47 6:06 faster than 96%
Farmers carry: 1:33 1:56 faster than 91%
Run 7: 4:50 6:09 faster than 96%
Sandbag lunges: 2:44 3:42 faster than 97%
Run 8: 5:12 6:37 faster than 94%
Wall balls: 3:38 4:01 faster than 84%
Roxzone: 6:23 9:20 faster than 98%
Runs (8 km) 37:52 48:15 faster than 96%
Stations (8) 24:53
Finish 1:09:04 1:27:28 19th of 858 · faster than 97%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team U29, with Nina ter Bogt 1:13:31 58th of 712; 23rd of 293 aged U29 39:01 26:01 8:29† Runs 39:01 · Stations 26:01 · Roxzone 8:29

58th of 712 Doubles Women (faster than 91%).

Fem Gelinck at HYROX Mechelen 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 712 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 712 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:19 7:43 faster than 90%
SkiErg: 4:30 4:41 faster than 76%
Run 2: 4:21 5:09 faster than 89%
Sled push: 1:16 1:30 faster than 89%
Run 3: 4:29 5:28 faster than 92%
Sled pull: 3:25 4:23 faster than 92%
Run 4: 4:47 5:31 faster than 85%
Burpee broad jump: 3:41 4:30 faster than 77%
Run 5: 4:52 5:36 faster than 82%
Row: 4:58 5:08 faster than 65%
Run 6: 4:31 5:33 faster than 93%
Farmers carry: 1:46 1:53 faster than 64%
Run 7: 4:48 5:32 faster than 84%
Sandbag lunges: 2:38 3:42 faster than 95%
Run 8: 4:54 5:57 faster than 90%
Wall balls: 3:47 4:00 faster than 69%
Roxzone †: 8:29
Runs (8 km) 39:01 46:43 faster than 90%
Stations (8) 26:01
Finish 1:13:31 1:27:45 58th of 712 · faster than 91%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, with Sanne Luesink 1:27:56 442nd of 665 48:05* 25:41* 6:50 Runs 48:05 · Stations 25:41 · Roxzone 6:50

442nd of 665 Doubles Women (faster than 33%).

Fem Gelinck at HYROX Maastricht Feb 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 665 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 665 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 9:03 7:52 faster than 12%
SkiErg: 4:41 4:37 faster than 40%
Run 2: 6:08 5:28 faster than 19%
Sled push: 1:47 1:33 faster than 18%
Run 3: 6:28 5:36 faster than 12%
Sled pull: 3:20 3:37 faster than 68%
Run 4: 6:35 5:41 faster than 12%
Burpee broad jump: 3:20 3:57 faster than 78%
Run 5: —
Row: 4:37 5:01 faster than 92%
Run 6: 6:37 5:44 faster than 16%
Farmers carry: 1:40 1:43 faster than 58%
Run 7: 6:41 5:46 faster than 16%
Sandbag lunges: 2:54 3:18 faster than 79%
Run 8: 6:33 5:48 faster than 22%
Wall balls: 3:22 3:50 faster than 95%
Roxzone: 6:50 6:54 faster than 53%
Runs (8 km) 48:05 42:11 faster than 17%
Stations (8) 25:41
Finish 1:27:56 1:23:14 442nd of 665 · faster than 33%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. † This venue did not time the roxzone: the figure is the finish minus runs and stations, and part of the walk is inside the run laps there, so it is shorter than at other venues. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Raced with

3 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Women race

Maastricht Sep 2025, against 939 Open Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Femedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Fem sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Roxzone (faster than 89% of the field), weakest on Wall balls (faster than 34%).

See the numbers
Part Fem: faster than
Ski 84%
Push 64%
Pull 42%
BBJ 35%
Row 76%
Carry 78%
Lunges 57%
Wall balls 34%
Roxzone 89%
Runs 78%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 84%
Sled push faster than 64%
Sled pull faster than 42%
Burpee broad jump faster than 35%
Row faster than 76%
Farmers carry faster than 78%
Sandbag lunges faster than 57%
Wall balls faster than 34%
Roxzone faster than 89%
Runs (8 km) faster than 78%

How much of the field Fem beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Roxzone (faster than 89%); weakest: Wall balls (faster than 34%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:18 faster
Sled push 0:10 faster
Sled pull 0:15 slower
Burpee broad jump 0:53 slower
Row 0:16 faster
Farmers carry 0:14 faster
Sandbag lunges 0:11 faster
Wall balls 0:59 slower
Roxzone 1:49 faster
Runs (8 km) 5:10 faster

Fem's time on each part against the typical Open Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (5:10 faster); weakest: Wall balls (0:59 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Fem against the typical Open Women finisher

Fem1:29:06
4:534:494:472:215:125:595:167:435:255:065:101:585:214:556:028:026:15
Typical Open Women1:35:00
5:305:075:302:315:445:445:516:506:065:225:552:125:525:066:337:038:04
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Fem: 42:06 running, 40:53 at the stations and 6:15 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (8:02).Below, Typical Open Women: 47:01 running, 39:56 at the stations and 8:04 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (7:03).

See the numbers
Part Fem Typical Open Women
Run 1 4:53 5:30
SkiErg 4:49 5:07
Run 2 4:47 5:30
Sled push 2:21 2:31
Run 3 5:12 5:44
Sled pull 5:59 5:44
Run 4 5:16 5:51
Burpee broad jump 7:43 6:50
Run 5 5:25 6:06
Row 5:06 5:22
Run 6 5:10 5:55
Farmers carry 1:58 2:12
Run 7 5:21 5:52
Sandbag lunges 4:55 5:06
Run 8 6:02 6:33
Wall balls 8:02 7:03
Roxzone 6:15 8:04
Finish 1:29:06 1:35:47

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Wall balls cost 0:59 against the typical Open Women finisher at Maastricht Sep 2025. The wall balls guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix wall balls. Then beat 1:29:06.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report