Athlete · Doubles Women · team 16-24 · GBR GBR

Emily Gavan

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/emily-gavan-t-15e98f

4 HYROX races over 2 seasons, all in a team with 3 partners.

Best Doubles Women time1:21:33Berlin 2025
Best Doubles Women place881stof 2,427 · Birmingham 2025
Latest race1:16:58Glasgow 2026 · Doubles Mixed with Tom StewartFirst Doubles Mixed race
Strongest part of the raceRoxzonefaster than 52% of Doubles Women at Berlin 2025
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:22:001:23:001:24:00 best 1:21:33

This line shows the finish time of Emily Gavan at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:21:33 at Berlin (May 2025); Emily Gavan was 0:02 slower at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Berlin May 2025 Doubles Women 1:21:33
Birmingham Oct 2025 Doubles Women 1:21:35

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

4 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Mixed, team 16-24, with Tom Stewart 1:16:58 707th of 2,163; 86th of 238 aged 16-24 49:07 23:40 4:15 Runs 49:07 · Stations 23:40 · Roxzone 4:15

707th of 2,163 Doubles Mixed (faster than 67%). Against the 65 who finished around 1:17:46: most time gained on sandbag lunges (1:18), most lost on the eight runs (4:27). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:37 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:24 more).

Emily Gavan at HYROX Glasgow 2026, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 2,163 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,163 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 5:57 5:46 faster than 42%
SkiErg: 3:57 4:20 faster than 93%
Run 2: 5:43 5:34 faster than 43%
Sled push: 1:47 2:08 faster than 86%
Run 3: 6:00 5:50 faster than 44%
Sled pull: 3:09 3:37 faster than 77%
Run 4: 6:07 5:54 faster than 41%
Burpee broad jump: 2:25 3:38 faster than 94%
Run 5: 6:05 6:00 faster than 47%
Row: 4:20 4:54 faster than 94%
Run 6: 6:05 5:58 faster than 45%
Farmers carry: 1:27 1:51 faster than 96%
Run 7: 6:16 5:58 faster than 38%
Sandbag lunges: 2:40 4:07 faster than 97%
Run 8: 6:58 6:41 faster than 41%
Wall balls: 3:55 4:50 faster than 91%
Roxzone: 4:15 5:10 faster than 72%
Runs (8 km) 49:07 47:51 faster than 44%
Stations (8) 23:40
Finish 1:16:58 1:23:17 707th of 2,163 · faster than 67%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Pro Doubles Women, team 16-24, with Anna Lewis 1:50:02 282nd of 295; 20th of 22 aged 16-24 1:01:45 39:30 8:50 Runs 1:01:45 · Stations 39:30 · Roxzone 8:50

282nd of 295 Pro Doubles Women (faster than 4%).

Emily Gavan at HYROX Manchester 2026, Pro Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Pro Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 295 Pro Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 295 Pro Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:34 3:52 faster than 5%
SkiErg: 4:40 4:23 faster than 15%
Run 2: 7:48 5:26 faster than 5%
Sled push: 3:46 2:17 faster than 0%
Run 3: 8:06 5:44 faster than 5%
Sled pull: 5:57 4:17 faster than 6%
Run 4: 8:22 5:47 faster than 4%
Burpee broad jump: 5:44 3:45 faster than 4%
Run 5: 8:10 5:54 faster than 6%
Row: 5:15 4:50 faster than 15%
Run 6: 8:13 5:53 faster than 5%
Farmers carry: 2:31 1:56 faster than 3%
Run 7: 8:20 5:54 faster than 5%
Sandbag lunges: 5:31 4:12 faster than 10%
Run 8: 7:17 4:50 faster than 5%
Wall balls: 6:06 4:11 faster than 5%
Roxzone: 8:50 4:56 faster than 4%
Runs (8 km) 1:01:45 43:44 faster than 4%
Stations (8) 39:30
Finish 1:50:02 1:19:02 282nd of 295 · faster than 4%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 16-24, with Anisha Wilke-Bapoo 1:21:35 881st of 2,427; 103rd of 300 aged 16-24 46:23 29:25 5:50 Runs 46:23 · Stations 29:25 · Roxzone 5:50

881st of 2,427 Doubles Women (faster than 63%). Against the 73 who finished around 1:21:17: most time gained on the roxzone (0:50), most lost on the eight runs (1:19). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:21 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:12 less).

Emily Gavan at HYROX Birmingham 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,427 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,427 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:43 6:34 faster than 83%
SkiErg: 4:38 4:45 faster than 65%
Run 2: 5:37 5:35 faster than 47%
Sled push: 1:58 1:56 faster than 46%
Run 3: 5:51 5:49 faster than 48%
Sled pull: 3:57 4:20 faster than 73%
Run 4: 5:51 5:54 faster than 52%
Burpee broad jump: 5:05 4:14 faster than 24%
Run 5: 6:00 5:59 faster than 49%
Row: 4:53 5:11 faster than 81%
Run 6: 5:38 5:53 faster than 61%
Farmers carry: 1:45 1:51 faster than 67%
Run 7: 6:00 5:53 faster than 45%
Sandbag lunges: 3:36 3:38 faster than 52%
Run 8: 5:45 5:54 faster than 56%
Wall balls: 3:33 4:23 faster than 96%
Roxzone: 5:50 7:03 faster than 84%
Runs (8 km) 46:23 47:38 faster than 57%
Stations (8) 29:25
Finish 1:21:35 1:25:22 881st of 2,427 · faster than 63%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team U29, with Anisha Wilke-Bapoo 1:21:33 964th of 1,701; 451st of 746 aged U29 43:52 28:34‡ 9:11 Runs 43:52 · Stations 28:34 · Roxzone 9:11

964th of 1,701 Doubles Women (faster than 43%). Against the 56 who finished around 1:21:05: most time gained on the roxzone (0:11), most lost on the eight runs (0:55). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:26 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:52 more).

Emily Gavan at HYROX Berlin 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,701 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,701 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:14 4:20 faster than 58%
SkiErg: 4:49 4:36 faster than 23%
Run 2: 5:14 5:01 faster than 36%
Sled push: 1:54 1:46 faster than 32%
Run 3: 5:27 5:09 faster than 34%
Sled pull: 3:44 3:41 faster than 47%
Run 4: 5:20 5:12 faster than 41%
Burpee broad jump: 4:24 3:57 faster than 31%
Run 5: 5:23 5:18 faster than 44%
Row: 5:08 4:56 faster than 27%
Run 6: 5:26 5:15 faster than 40%
Farmers carry: 1:59 1:45 faster than 19%
Run 7: 5:37 5:14 faster than 31%
Sandbag lunges: 3:56 3:32 faster than 30%
Run 8: 7:14 6:38 faster than 29%
Wall balls: 2:40 ‡ 4:01
Roxzone: 9:11 9:15 faster than 51%
Runs (8 km) 43:52 42:06 faster than 37%
Stations (8) 28:34
Finish 1:21:33 1:19:51 964th of 1,701 · faster than 43%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. ‡ The organiser timed all eight stations and the total is theirs, but one split is not used in comparisons: it was under our floor for that station (just under the fastest Elite 15 splits ever), which usually means a timing slip at the mats or a short course. Open the splits to see it. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group.

Best splits · Doubles Women

The fastest Emily has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:38 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 4:49
Sled push 1:54 Berlin 2025 · best of 2 1:52
Sled pull 3:44 Berlin 2025 · best of 2 4:13
Burpee broad jump 4:24 Berlin 2025 · best of 2 4:18
Row 4:53 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 5:13
Farmers carry 1:45 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 1:52
Sandbag lunges 3:36 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 3:47
Wall balls 3:33 Birmingham 2025 4:22
Runs (8 km) 43:52 Berlin 2025 · best of 2 49:17
Roxzone 5:50 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 7:46
How to read

Each station's best across Emily's Doubles Women races, from different races, against the typical Doubles Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

3 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Doubles Women race

Berlin 2025, against 1,701 Doubles Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall balls
no split
RoxzoneRuns
Emilyedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Emily sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Roxzone (faster than 52% of the field), weakest on Carry (faster than 19%).

See the numbers
Part Emily: faster than
Ski 24%
Push 32%
Pull 47%
BBJ 32%
Row 28%
Carry 19%
Lunges 30%
Wall balls no split
Roxzone 52%
Runs 38%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 24%
Sled push faster than 32%
Sled pull faster than 47%
Burpee broad jump faster than 32%
Row faster than 28%
Farmers carry faster than 19%
Sandbag lunges faster than 30%
Wall balls —
Roxzone faster than 52%
Runs (8 km) faster than 38%

How much of the field Emily beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Roxzone (faster than 52%); weakest: Farmers carry (faster than 19%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:13 slower
Sled push 0:08 slower
Sled pull 0:03 slower
Burpee broad jump 0:27 slower
Row 0:12 slower
Farmers carry 0:14 slower
Sandbag lunges 0:24 slower
Roxzone 0:04 faster
Runs (8 km) 1:46 slower

Emily's time on each part against the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race.Best: Roxzone (0:04 faster); weakest: Runs (8 km) (1:46 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Emily against the typical Doubles Women finisher

Emily1:21:33
4:144:495:141:545:273:445:204:245:235:085:261:595:373:567:149:11
Typical Doubles Women1:19:36
4:204:365:011:465:093:415:123:575:184:565:151:455:143:326:384:019:15
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Emily: 43:54 running, 25:53 at the stations and 9:11 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:08) and the shortest the sled push (1:54).Below, Typical Doubles Women: 42:07 running, 28:14 at the stations and 9:15 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (4:56).

See the numbers
Part Emily Typical Doubles Women
Run 1 4:14 4:20
SkiErg 4:49 4:36
Run 2 5:14 5:01
Sled push 1:54 1:46
Run 3 5:27 5:09
Sled pull 3:44 3:41
Run 4 5:20 5:12
Burpee broad jump 4:24 3:57
Run 5 5:23 5:18
Row 5:08 4:56
Run 6 5:26 5:15
Farmers carry 1:59 1:45
Run 7 5:37 5:14
Sandbag lunges 3:56 3:32
Run 8 7:14 6:38
Wall balls — 4:01
Roxzone 9:11 9:15
Finish 1:21:33 1:19:51

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Burpee broad jump cost 0:27 against the typical Doubles Women finisher at Berlin 2025. The burpee broad jump guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix burpee broad jump. Then beat 1:21:33.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report