Athlete · Open Women · 40-44 · GBR GBR

Emily Gallagher

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/emily-gallagher-2a7608b5

5 HYROX races over 1 season: 1 solo, 4 in a team with 5 partners.

Open Women time1:22:30London ExCeL 2025
Open Women place747thof 2,921 · London ExCeL 2025
Latest race1:13:58Málaga 2026 · Doubles Women with Danielle WhitlockEmily's best Doubles Women time so far
Strongest part of the raceBurpee broad jumpfaster than 84% of Open Women at London ExCeL 2025
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:14:001:15:001:16:001:17:00 best 1:13:58 best 1:13:58 · Málaga

This line shows the finish time of Emily Gallagher at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:13:58 at Málaga (Apr 2026); Emily Gallagher was 3:37 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Birmingham Oct 2025 Doubles Women 1:17:35
Amsterdam Jan 2026 Doubles Women 1:15:42
Málaga Apr 2026 Doubles Women 1:13:58

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

5 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Women, team 40-44, with Danielle Whitlock 1:13:58 224th of 1,468; 15th of 173 aged 40-44 40:51 27:31 5:39 Runs 40:51 · Stations 27:31 · Roxzone 5:39

224th of 1,468 Doubles Women (faster than 84%). Against the 44 who finished around 1:13:55: most time gained on the eight runs (0:14), most lost on sandbag lunges (0:33). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:09 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:55 more).

Emily Gallagher at HYROX Málaga 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,468 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,468 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:34 5:23 faster than 86%
SkiErg: 4:20 4:43 faster than 91%
Run 2: 4:49 5:38 faster than 87%
Sled push: 1:36 1:48 faster than 83%
Run 3: 5:13 5:53 faster than 80%
Sled pull: 3:33 4:05 faster than 80%
Run 4: 5:16 5:56 faster than 79%
Burpee broad jump: 3:36 4:13 faster than 74%
Run 5: 5:14 6:03 faster than 83%
Row: 5:00 5:16 faster than 78%
Run 6: 5:12 5:58 faster than 83%
Farmers carry: 1:41 1:46 faster than 65%
Run 7: 5:22 6:01 faster than 78%
Sandbag lunges: 3:38 3:36 faster than 48%
Run 8: 5:14 5:53 faster than 78%
Wall balls: 4:07 4:15 faster than 58%
Roxzone: 5:39 7:14 faster than 85%
Runs (8 km) 40:51 46:53 faster than 83%
Stations (8) 27:31
Finish 1:13:58 1:24:02 224th of 1,468 · faster than 84%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 40-44, with Danielle Whitlock 1:15:42 244th of 1,635; 23rd of 153 aged 40-44 42:16 27:48 5:44 Runs 42:16 · Stations 27:48 · Roxzone 5:44

244th of 1,635 Doubles Women (faster than 85%). Against the 49 who finished around 1:15:47: most time gained on the roxzone (0:21), most lost on sandbag lunges (0:43). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:10 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:14 more).

Emily Gallagher at HYROX Amsterdam 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,635 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,635 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 4:12 4:45 faster than 80%
SkiErg: 4:24 4:38 faster than 82%
Run 2: 4:53 5:48 faster than 90%
Sled push: 1:39 1:50 faster than 80%
Run 3: 7:12 6:01 faster than 8%
Sled pull: 3:46 4:03 faster than 69%
Run 4: 4:58 6:03 faster than 93%
Burpee broad jump: 3:43 4:15 faster than 74%
Run 5: 5:05 6:11 faster than 93%
Row: 4:44 5:03 faster than 86%
Run 6: 5:06 6:10 faster than 92%
Farmers carry: 1:38 1:51 faster than 82%
Run 7: 5:07 6:08 faster than 91%
Sandbag lunges: 3:56 3:36 faster than 33%
Run 8: 5:47 6:42 faster than 84%
Wall balls: 3:58 4:21 faster than 75%
Roxzone: 5:44 7:19 faster than 91%
Runs (8 km) 42:16 47:57 faster than 83%
Stations (8) 27:48
Finish 1:15:42 1:25:19 244th of 1,635 · faster than 85%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

London ExCeL 2025 4 Dec 2025 · 2 results
Race results
Open Women, 40-44 1:22:30 747th of 2,921; 84th of 369 aged 40-44 34:11* 36:56* 11:28 Runs 34:11 · Stations 36:56 · Roxzone 11:28

747th of 2,921 Open Women (faster than 74%). Against the 87 who finished around 1:22:20: most time gained on burpee broad jump (0:32), most lost on wall balls (1:16). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:30 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:54 more).

Emily Gallagher at HYROX London ExCeL 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 2,921 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,921 Open Women here
Run 1: 3:19 3:39 faster than 73%
SkiErg: 5:15 5:33 faster than 79%
Run 2: 3:57 4:20 faster than 73%
Sled push: 2:24 2:46 faster than 76%
Run 3: 4:01 4:30 faster than 78%
Sled pull: 5:25 5:34 faster than 55%
Run 4: 4:05 4:35 faster than 76%
Burpee broad jump: 5:06 6:43 faster than 83%
Run 5: 4:15 4:39 faster than 72%
Row: 5:16 5:34 faster than 76%
Run 6: 4:13 4:37 faster than 71%
Farmers carry: 2:06 2:11 faster than 59%
Run 7: 4:17 4:36 faster than 68%
Sandbag lunges: 4:12 5:02 faster than 78%
Run 8: 6:07 6:33 faster than 66%
Wall balls: 7:12 6:49 faster than 43%
Roxzone: 11:28 13:10 faster than 77%
Runs (8 km) 34:11 37:29 faster than 72%
Stations (8) 36:56
Finish 1:22:30 1:31:10 747th of 2,921 · faster than 74%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 35-39, with Abbi Lyons 1:17:35 547th of 2,427; 97th of 437 aged 35-39 43:09 28:36 5:55 Runs 43:09 · Stations 28:36 · Roxzone 5:55

547th of 2,427 Doubles Women (faster than 77%). Against the 74 who finished around 1:18:26: most time gained on the eight runs (0:33), most lost on sled push (0:36). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:05 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:12 less).

Emily Gallagher at HYROX Birmingham 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,427 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,427 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:46 6:34 faster than 81%
SkiErg: 4:35 4:45 faster than 72%
Run 2: 4:52 5:35 faster than 83%
Sled push: 2:21 1:56 faster than 14%
Run 3: 5:32 5:49 faster than 63%
Sled pull: 4:09 4:20 faster than 61%
Run 4: 5:24 5:54 faster than 73%
Burpee broad jump: 3:22 4:14 faster than 84%
Run 5: 5:18 5:59 faster than 79%
Row: 4:47 5:11 faster than 88%
Run 6: 5:29 5:53 faster than 69%
Farmers carry: 1:43 1:51 faster than 72%
Run 7: 5:27 5:53 faster than 70%
Sandbag lunges: 3:33 3:38 faster than 55%
Run 8: 5:25 5:54 faster than 71%
Wall balls: 4:06 4:23 faster than 67%
Roxzone: 5:55 7:03 faster than 82%
Runs (8 km) 43:09 47:38 faster than 75%
Stations (8) 28:36
Finish 1:17:35 1:25:22 547th of 2,427 · faster than 77%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's, and a relay place is among all relay teams at that race (relay teams are ranked together). Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. A dash in runs, stations and roxzone on a result from the live results service means the splits are not in yet (finish time only). The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. A dash means the organiser did not publish that number for the result. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Raced with

5 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Women race

London ExCeL 2025, against 2,921 Open Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Emilyedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Emily sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on BBJ (faster than 84% of the field), weakest on Wall balls (faster than 44%).

See the numbers
Part Emily: faster than
Ski 80%
Push 76%
Pull 56%
BBJ 84%
Row 77%
Carry 59%
Lunges 79%
Wall balls 44%
Roxzone 78%
Runs 73%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 80%
Sled push faster than 76%
Sled pull faster than 56%
Burpee broad jump faster than 84%
Row faster than 77%
Farmers carry faster than 59%
Sandbag lunges faster than 79%
Wall balls faster than 44%
Roxzone faster than 78%
Runs (8 km) faster than 73%

How much of the field Emily beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Burpee broad jump (faster than 84%); weakest: Wall balls (faster than 44%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:18 faster
Sled push 0:22 faster
Sled pull 0:09 faster
Burpee broad jump 1:37 faster
Row 0:18 faster
Farmers carry 0:05 faster
Sandbag lunges 0:50 faster
Wall balls 0:23 slower
Roxzone 1:42 faster
Runs (8 km) 3:18 faster

Emily's time on each part against the typical Open Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (3:18 faster); weakest: Wall balls (0:23 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Emily against the typical Open Women finisher

Emily1:22:30
3:195:153:572:244:015:254:055:064:155:164:132:064:174:126:077:1211:28
Typical Open Women1:30:51
3:395:334:202:464:305:344:356:434:395:344:372:114:365:026:336:4913:10
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Emily: 34:14 running, 36:56 at the stations and 11:28 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (7:12).Below, Typical Open Women: 37:29 running, 40:12 at the stations and 13:10 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (6:49).

See the numbers
Part Emily Typical Open Women
Run 1 3:19 3:39
SkiErg 5:15 5:33
Run 2 3:57 4:20
Sled push 2:24 2:46
Run 3 4:01 4:30
Sled pull 5:25 5:34
Run 4 4:05 4:35
Burpee broad jump 5:06 6:43
Run 5 4:15 4:39
Row 5:16 5:34
Run 6 4:13 4:37
Farmers carry 2:06 2:11
Run 7 4:17 4:36
Sandbag lunges 4:12 5:02
Run 8 6:07 6:33
Wall balls 7:12 6:49
Roxzone 11:28 13:10
Finish 1:22:30 1:31:10

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Wall balls cost 0:23 against the typical Open Women finisher at London ExCeL 2025. The wall balls guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix wall balls. Then beat 1:22:30.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report