Athlete · Doubles Women · team 16-24 · GBR GBR

Annabel Eales

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/annabel-eales-t-d6d653

2 HYROX races over 1 season, all in a team with 1 partner. Best Doubles Women time: 1:30:09 at London ExCeL 2025.

Best Doubles Women time1:30:09London ExCeL 2025
Best Doubles Women place2412thof 3,491 · London ExCeL 2025
Latest race1:30:09London ExCeL 2025 · Doubles Women with Melissa NavinAnnabel's best Doubles Women time so far
Strongest part of the raceSled pullfaster than 65% of Doubles Women at London ExCeL 2025

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:31:001:32:001:33:001:34:001:35:001:36:00 best 1:30:09

This line shows the finish time of Annabel Eales at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:30:09 at London ExCeL (Dec 2025); Annabel Eales was 6:39 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Birmingham Oct 2025 Doubles Women 1:36:48
London ExCeL Dec 2025 Doubles Women 1:30:09

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

2 results at 2 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Women, team 16-24, with Melissa Navin 1:30:09 2412th of 3,491; 301st of 417 aged 16-24 42:27* 33:38* 14:08 Runs 42:27 · Stations 33:38 · Roxzone 14:08

2,412th of 3,491 Doubles Women (faster than 30%). Against the 107 who finished around 1:30:35: most time gained on sled pull (0:40), most lost on wall balls (0:31). Runs 5 to 8 took 4:55 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 3:21 more).

Annabel Eales at HYROX London ExCeL 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 3,491 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 3,491 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 3:59 4:02 faster than 53%
SkiErg: 5:11 5:07 faster than 43%
Run 2: 4:52 4:37 faster than 34%
Sled push: 2:21 1:51 faster than 7%
Run 3: 4:58 4:45 faster than 38%
Sled pull: 3:58 4:13 faster than 64%
Run 4: 4:59 4:51 faster than 42%
Burpee broad jump: 5:04 4:23 faster than 28%
Run 5: 5:19 4:54 faster than 29%
Row: 5:41 5:19 faster than 20%
Run 6: 5:25 4:53 faster than 25%
Farmers carry: 2:19 1:49 faster than 3%
Run 7: 5:05 4:54 faster than 40%
Sandbag lunges: 3:47 3:41 faster than 45%
Run 8: 7:54 6:42 faster than 19%
Wall balls: 5:17 4:27 faster than 19%
Roxzone: 14:08 13:21 faster than 36%
Runs (8 km) 42:27 39:40 faster than 32%
Stations (8) 33:38
Finish 1:30:09 1:24:12 2412th of 3,491 · faster than 30%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 16-24, with Melissa Navin 1:36:48 1961st of 2,427; 239th of 300 aged 16-24 53:43 35:05 8:05 Runs 53:43 · Stations 35:05 · Roxzone 8:05

1,961st of 2,427 Doubles Women (faster than 19%). Against the 74 who finished around 1:36:24: most time gained on the roxzone (0:21), most lost on wall balls (0:42). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:03 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:24 more).

Annabel Eales at HYROX Birmingham 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,427 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,427 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 7:40 6:34 faster than 14%
SkiErg: 5:12 4:45 faster than 8%
Run 2: 6:20 5:35 faster than 19%
Sled push: 2:35 1:56 faster than 6%
Run 3: 6:25 5:49 faster than 25%
Sled pull: 5:05 4:20 faster than 17%
Run 4: 6:30 5:54 faster than 24%
Burpee broad jump: 5:10 4:14 faster than 22%
Run 5: 6:43 5:59 faster than 23%
Row: 5:23 5:11 faster than 29%
Run 6: 6:37 5:53 faster than 23%
Farmers carry: 2:00 1:51 faster than 30%
Run 7: 6:41 5:53 faster than 22%
Sandbag lunges: 4:07 3:38 faster than 29%
Run 8: 6:51 5:54 faster than 20%
Wall balls: 5:33 4:23 faster than 11%
Roxzone: 8:05 7:03 faster than 26%
Runs (8 km) 53:43 47:38 faster than 21%
Stations (8) 35:05
Finish 1:36:48 1:25:22 1961st of 2,427 · faster than 19%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Doubles Women

The fastest Annabel has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 5:11 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 4:49
Sled push 2:21 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 1:52
Sled pull 3:58 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 4:13
Burpee broad jump 5:04 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 4:18
Row 5:23 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 5:13
Farmers carry 2:00 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 1:52
Sandbag lunges 3:47 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 3:47
Wall balls 5:17 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 4:22
Runs (8 km) 42:27 London ExCeL 2025 · best of 2 49:17
Roxzone 8:05 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 7:46
How to read

Each station's best across Annabel's Doubles Women races, from different races, against the typical Doubles Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

1 team partner

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Doubles Women race

London ExCeL 2025, against 3,491 Doubles Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Annabeledge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Annabel sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Pull (faster than 65% of the field), weakest on Carry (faster than 4%).

See the numbers
Part Annabel: faster than
Ski 43%
Push 8%
Pull 65%
BBJ 29%
Row 20%
Carry 4%
Lunges 46%
Wall balls 19%
Roxzone 37%
Runs 32%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 43%
Sled push faster than 8%
Sled pull faster than 65%
Burpee broad jump faster than 29%
Row faster than 20%
Farmers carry faster than 4%
Sandbag lunges faster than 46%
Wall balls faster than 19%
Roxzone faster than 37%
Runs (8 km) faster than 32%

How much of the field Annabel beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Sled pull (faster than 65%); weakest: Farmers carry (faster than 4%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:04 slower
Sled push 0:30 slower
Sled pull 0:15 faster
Burpee broad jump 0:41 slower
Row 0:22 slower
Farmers carry 0:30 slower
Sandbag lunges 0:06 slower
Wall balls 0:50 slower
Roxzone 0:47 slower
Runs (8 km) 2:47 slower

Annabel's time on each part against the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race.Best: Sled pull (0:15 faster); weakest: Runs (8 km) (2:47 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Annabel against the typical Doubles Women finisher

Annabel1:30:09
3:595:114:522:214:583:584:595:045:195:415:252:195:053:477:545:1714:08
Typical Doubles Women1:23:49
4:025:074:371:514:454:134:514:234:545:194:531:494:543:416:424:2713:21
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Annabel: 42:31 running, 33:38 at the stations and 14:08 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:41).Below, Typical Doubles Women: 39:38 running, 30:50 at the stations and 13:21 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:19).

See the numbers
Part Annabel Typical Doubles Women
Run 1 3:59 4:02
SkiErg 5:11 5:07
Run 2 4:52 4:37
Sled push 2:21 1:51
Run 3 4:58 4:45
Sled pull 3:58 4:13
Run 4 4:59 4:51
Burpee broad jump 5:04 4:23
Run 5 5:19 4:54
Row 5:41 5:19
Run 6 5:25 4:53
Farmers carry 2:19 1:49
Run 7 5:05 4:54
Sandbag lunges 3:47 3:41
Run 8 7:54 6:42
Wall balls 5:17 4:27
Roxzone 14:08 13:21
Finish 1:30:09 1:24:12

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Wall balls cost 0:50 against the typical Doubles Women finisher at London ExCeL 2025. The wall balls guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix wall balls. Then beat 1:30:09.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report