Athlete · Doubles Women · team 30-34 · GBR GBR

Alice Young

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/alice-young-t-330f04

4 HYROX races over 2 seasons, all in a team with 4 partners.

Best Doubles Women time1:27:52Birmingham 2025
Best Doubles Women place1427thof 2,427 · Birmingham 2025
Latest race1:43:03Warsaw 2026 · Doubles Mixed with Lee PowellFirst Doubles Mixed race
Strongest part of the raceSkiErgfaster than 81% of Doubles Women at Birmingham 2025
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:28:001:30:001:32:001:34:001:36:00 best 1:27:52 best 1:27:52 · Birmingham

This line shows the finish time of Alice Young at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:27:52 at Birmingham (Oct 2025); Alice Young was 9:50 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Barcelona Apr 2025 Doubles Women 1:37:42
Rome Sep 2025 Doubles Women 1:37:43
Birmingham Oct 2025 Doubles Women 1:27:52

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

4 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Mixed, team 30-34, with Lee Powell 1:43:03 1133rd of 1,199; 283rd of 290 aged 30-34 1:05:31 30:37 7:00 Runs 1:05:31 · Stations 30:37 · Roxzone 7:00

1,133rd of 1,199 Doubles Mixed (faster than 5%). Against the 37 who finished around 1:43:31: most time gained on the roxzone (1:23), most lost on the eight runs (6:09). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:31 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:46 more).

Alice Young at HYROX Warsaw 2026, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 1,199 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,199 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 5:24 4:22 faster than 13%
SkiErg: 4:16 4:13 faster than 43%
Run 2: 8:04 5:44 faster than 3%
Sled push: 1:58 2:02 faster than 59%
Run 3: 8:38 5:59 faster than 3%
Sled pull: 3:37 3:23 faster than 37%
Run 4: 8:56 5:59 faster than 2%
Burpee broad jump: 4:44 3:28 faster than 13%
Run 5: 8:51 6:04 faster than 2%
Row: 4:46 4:43 faster than 45%
Run 6: 8:54 5:58 faster than 2%
Farmers carry: 1:46 1:37 faster than 30%
Run 7: 8:46 6:02 faster than 2%
Sandbag lunges: 4:20 3:45 faster than 29%
Run 8: 8:02 4:58 faster than 3%
Wall balls: 5:10 4:12 faster than 17%
Roxzone: 7:00 5:27 faster than 19%
Runs (8 km) 1:05:31 45:36 faster than 2%
Stations (8) 30:37
Finish 1:43:03 1:18:49 1133rd of 1,199 · faster than 5%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 30-34, with Connie Short 1:27:52 1427th of 2,427; 326th of 503 aged 30-34 51:24 28:54 7:38 Runs 51:24 · Stations 28:54 · Roxzone 7:38

1,427th of 2,427 Doubles Women (faster than 41%). Against the 73 who finished around 1:28:09: most time gained on sandbag lunges (0:30), most lost on the eight runs (1:41). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:54 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:01 more).

Alice Young at HYROX Birmingham 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,427 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,427 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:41 6:34 faster than 44%
SkiErg: 4:31 4:45 faster than 80%
Run 2: 5:49 5:35 faster than 37%
Sled push: 1:45 1:56 faster than 71%
Run 3: 6:19 5:49 faster than 29%
Sled pull: 4:24 4:20 faster than 46%
Run 4: 6:28 5:54 faster than 25%
Burpee broad jump: 4:12 4:14 faster than 51%
Run 5: 6:39 5:59 faster than 25%
Row: 5:01 5:11 faster than 68%
Run 6: 6:29 5:53 faster than 27%
Farmers carry: 1:56 1:51 faster than 39%
Run 7: 6:35 5:53 faster than 24%
Sandbag lunges: 3:09 3:38 faster than 78%
Run 8: 6:28 5:54 faster than 30%
Wall balls: 3:56 4:23 faster than 79%
Roxzone: 7:38 7:03 faster than 35%
Runs (8 km) 51:24 47:38 faster than 30%
Stations (8) 28:54
Finish 1:27:52 1:25:22 1427th of 2,427 · faster than 41%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Rome 2025 27 Sep 2025
Race results
Doubles Women, team 16-24, with Abigail Potts 1:37:43 834th of 958; 101st of 121 aged 16-24 54:11 34:13 9:23 Runs 54:11 · Stations 34:13 · Roxzone 9:23

834th of 958 Doubles Women (faster than 12%).

Alice Young at HYROX Rome 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 958 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 958 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 8:35 7:02 faster than 5%
SkiErg: 4:47 4:47 faster than 51%
Run 2: 6:06 5:15 faster than 14%
Sled push: 1:49 1:52 faster than 58%
Run 3: 6:33 5:28 faster than 11%
Sled pull: 5:20 4:16 faster than 9%
Run 4: 6:32 5:32 faster than 14%
Burpee broad jump: 5:11 4:00 faster than 16%
Run 5: 6:58 5:40 faster than 11%
Row: 5:32 5:16 faster than 25%
Run 6: 6:27 5:34 faster than 18%
Farmers carry: 2:01 1:48 faster than 21%
Run 7: 6:10 5:34 faster than 27%
Sandbag lunges: 4:51 3:45 faster than 9%
Run 8: 6:53 6:17 faster than 29%
Wall balls: 4:42 4:12 faster than 23%
Roxzone: 9:23 7:17 faster than 9%
Runs (8 km) 54:11 46:35 faster than 14%
Stations (8) 34:13
Finish 1:37:43 1:24:13 834th of 958 · faster than 12%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 30-39, with Larissa Francis 1:37:42 774th of 897; 329th of 373 aged 30-39 56:46 31:51 9:10 Runs 56:46 · Stations 31:51 · Roxzone 9:10

774th of 897 Doubles Women (faster than 13%).

Alice Young at HYROX Barcelona 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 897 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 897 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:32 5:18 faster than 5%
SkiErg: 4:43 4:41 faster than 44%
Run 2: 6:47 5:35 faster than 8%
Sled push: 1:58 1:55 faster than 44%
Run 3: 7:05 5:54 faster than 12%
Sled pull: 4:58 4:08 faster than 19%
Run 4: 7:19 5:57 faster than 9%
Burpee broad jump: 5:39 4:00 faster than 8%
Run 5: 7:14 6:01 faster than 11%
Row: 4:46 5:04 faster than 81%
Run 6: 7:09 5:57 faster than 11%
Farmers carry: 1:39 1:49 faster than 76%
Run 7: 7:24 5:57 faster than 9%
Sandbag lunges: 3:46 3:33 faster than 38%
Run 8: 7:21 6:07 faster than 14%
Wall balls: 4:22 4:04 faster than 30%
Roxzone: 9:10 7:12 faster than 16%
Runs (8 km) 56:46 46:47 faster than 10%
Stations (8) 31:51
Finish 1:37:42 1:23:41 774th of 897 · faster than 13%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group.

Best splits · Doubles Women

The fastest Alice has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:31 Birmingham 2025 · best of 3 4:49
Sled push 1:45 Birmingham 2025 · best of 3 1:52
Sled pull 4:24 Birmingham 2025 · best of 3 4:13
Burpee broad jump 4:12 Birmingham 2025 · best of 3 4:18
Row 4:46 Barcelona 2025 · best of 3 5:13
Farmers carry 1:39 Barcelona 2025 · best of 3 1:52
Sandbag lunges 3:09 Birmingham 2025 · best of 3 3:47
Wall balls 3:56 Birmingham 2025 · best of 3 4:22
Runs (8 km) 51:24 Birmingham 2025 · best of 3 49:17
Roxzone 7:38 Birmingham 2025 · best of 3 7:46
How to read

Each station's best across Alice's Doubles Women races, from different races, against the typical Doubles Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

4 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Doubles Women race

Birmingham 2025, against 2,427 Doubles Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Aliceedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Alice sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Ski (faster than 81% of the field), weakest on Runs (faster than 30%).

See the numbers
Part Alice: faster than
Ski 81%
Push 72%
Pull 47%
BBJ 52%
Row 68%
Carry 40%
Lunges 78%
Wall balls 80%
Roxzone 36%
Runs 30%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 81%
Sled push faster than 72%
Sled pull faster than 47%
Burpee broad jump faster than 52%
Row faster than 68%
Farmers carry faster than 40%
Sandbag lunges faster than 78%
Wall balls faster than 80%
Roxzone faster than 36%
Runs (8 km) faster than 30%

How much of the field Alice beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: SkiErg (faster than 81%); weakest: Runs (8 km) (faster than 30%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:14 faster
Sled push 0:11 faster
Sled pull 0:04 slower
Burpee broad jump 0:02 faster
Row 0:10 faster
Farmers carry 0:05 slower
Sandbag lunges 0:29 faster
Wall balls 0:27 faster
Roxzone 0:35 slower
Runs (8 km) 3:46 slower

Alice's time on each part against the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race.Best: Sandbag lunges (0:29 faster); weakest: Runs (8 km) (3:46 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Alice against the typical Doubles Women finisher

Alice1:27:52
6:414:315:491:456:194:246:284:126:395:016:291:566:353:096:283:567:38
Typical Doubles Women1:24:52
6:344:455:351:565:494:205:544:145:595:115:531:515:533:385:544:237:03
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Alice: 51:28 running, 28:54 at the stations and 7:38 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:01) and the shortest the sled push (1:45).Below, Typical Doubles Women: 47:31 running, 30:18 at the stations and 7:03 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:11).

See the numbers
Part Alice Typical Doubles Women
Run 1 6:41 6:34
SkiErg 4:31 4:45
Run 2 5:49 5:35
Sled push 1:45 1:56
Run 3 6:19 5:49
Sled pull 4:24 4:20
Run 4 6:28 5:54
Burpee broad jump 4:12 4:14
Run 5 6:39 5:59
Row 5:01 5:11
Run 6 6:29 5:53
Farmers carry 1:56 1:51
Run 7 6:35 5:53
Sandbag lunges 3:09 3:38
Run 8 6:28 5:54
Wall balls 3:56 4:23
Roxzone 7:38 7:03
Finish 1:27:52 1:25:22

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Roxzone cost 0:35 against the typical Doubles Women finisher at Birmingham 2025. The pacing guide is where that time comes back.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix roxzone. Then beat 1:27:52.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report