Athlete · Open Women · 30-34 · GBR GBR

Esther Drew

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/esther-drew-7130fa78

4 HYROX races over 2 seasons: 2 solo, 2 in a team with 1 partner.

Best Open Women time1:32:32Birmingham 2024
Best Open Women place635thof 1,410 · Birmingham 2024
Latest race1:35:11Madrid 2025 · Open Women2:39 slower than Esther's best Open Women time (1:32:32)
Strongest part of the raceSled pullfaster than 92% of Open Women at Birmingham 2024
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Finish time, race by race: one race type at a time

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:33:001:34:001:35:00 best 1:32:32

This line shows the finish time of Esther Drew at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:32:32 at Birmingham (Oct 2024); Esther Drew was 2:39 slower at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Birmingham Oct 2024 Open Women 1:32:32
Madrid Nov 2025 Open Women 1:35:11

Each dot is one Open Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Open Women races yet to measure the change.

Every race

4 results at 3 races

Tap a result for its full report
Open Women, 30-34 1:35:11 732nd of 1,338; 158th of 285 aged 30-34 48:01 33:57 7 of 8 13:18 Runs 48:01 · Stations 33:57 · Roxzone 13:18

732nd of 1,338 Open Women (faster than 45%). Against the 43 who finished around 1:35:16: most time gained on sled pull (1:08), most lost on the roxzone (5:34). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:02 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:31 more).

Esther Drew at HYROX Madrid 2025, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,338 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,338 Open Women here
Run 1: 5:22 5:03 faster than 32%
SkiErg: 5:27 5:27 faster than 51%
Run 2: 5:21 5:19 faster than 48%
Sled push: 2:30 2:56 faster than 82%
Run 3: 5:46 5:32 faster than 38%
Sled pull: 4:24 5:24 faster than 88%
Run 4: 6:02 5:35 faster than 30%
Burpee broad jump: 7:47 6:39 faster than 29%
Run 5: 5:49 5:44 faster than 46%
Row: 5:11 5:27 faster than 76%
Run 6: 6:05 5:39 faster than 30%
Farmers carry: 1:52 2:31 faster than 94%
Run 7: 5:56 5:35 faster than 34%
Sandbag lunges: 0:02 ‡ 4:58
Run 8: 7:43 6:41 faster than 22%
Wall balls: 6:44 6:37 faster than 48%
Roxzone: 13:18 7:31 faster than 2%
Runs (8 km) 48:01 45:26 faster than 34%
Stations (8) 33:57 (7 of 8)
Finish 1:35:11 1:33:47 732nd of 1,338 · faster than 45%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Paris 2025 18 Apr 2025
Race results
Doubles Women, team 30-39, with Elaine Farrell 1:18:10 288th of 988; 119th of 424 aged 30-39 43:18 28:21 6:37 Runs 43:18 · Stations 28:21 · Roxzone 6:37

288th of 988 Doubles Women (faster than 70%).

Esther Drew at HYROX Paris 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 988 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 988 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:00 5:54 faster than 92%
SkiErg: 4:23 4:48 faster than 93%
Run 2: 4:40 5:28 faster than 92%
Sled push: 1:31 1:43 faster than 84%
Run 3: 4:57 5:41 faster than 90%
Sled pull: 3:01 3:59 faster than 95%
Run 4: 4:53 5:43 faster than 91%
Burpee broad jump: 6:03 4:33 faster than 12%
Run 5: 6:26 5:48 faster than 21%
Row: 4:45 5:05 faster than 84%
Run 6: 5:06 5:45 faster than 85%
Farmers carry: 1:30 1:50 faster than 95%
Run 7: 5:53 5:51 faster than 48%
Sandbag lunges: 3:34 3:50 faster than 65%
Run 8: 6:26 5:17 faster than 11%
Wall balls: 3:34 4:14 faster than 93%
Roxzone: 6:37 7:28 faster than 79%
Runs (8 km) 43:18 45:24 faster than 67%
Stations (8) 28:21
Finish 1:18:10 1:23:21 288th of 988 · faster than 70%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Birmingham 2024 25 Oct 2024 · 2 results
Race results
Open Women, 30-34 1:32:32 635th of 1,410; 133rd of 263 aged 30-34 46:15 38:24 7:57 Runs 46:15 · Stations 38:24 · Roxzone 7:57

635th of 1,410 Open Women (faster than 55%). Against the 43 who finished around 1:32:32: most time gained on sled pull (1:34), most lost on the eight runs (1:23). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:50 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:22 more).

Esther Drew at HYROX Birmingham 2024, Open Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Women at this race, and the share of the 1,410 Open Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,410 Open Women here
Run 1: 6:01 6:07 faster than 55%
SkiErg: 4:59 5:05 faster than 64%
Run 2: 5:27 5:20 faster than 43%
Sled push: 2:43 2:40 faster than 46%
Run 3: 5:04 5:32 faster than 72%
Sled pull: 4:21 5:41 faster than 92%
Run 4: 5:42 5:37 faster than 45%
Burpee broad jump: 7:36 7:03 faster than 39%
Run 5: 5:55 5:46 faster than 43%
Row: 5:23 5:25 faster than 53%
Run 6: 5:57 5:39 faster than 36%
Farmers carry: 1:56 2:13 faster than 82%
Run 7: 5:54 5:37 faster than 36%
Sandbag lunges: 5:54 5:02 faster than 27%
Run 8: 6:18 6:02 faster than 41%
Wall balls: 5:32 6:45 faster than 75%
Roxzone: 7:57 8:04 faster than 52%
Runs (8 km) 46:15 45:50 faster than 47%
Stations (8) 38:24
Finish 1:32:32 1:34:24 635th of 1,410 · faster than 55%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 30-39, with Elaine Farrell 1:18:40 353rd of 1,370; 169th of 603 aged 30-39 41:53 29:01 7:50 Runs 41:53 · Stations 29:01 · Roxzone 7:50

353rd of 1,370 Doubles Women (faster than 74%). Against the 41 who finished around 1:18:30: most time gained on the eight runs (1:50), most lost on burpee broad jump (2:09). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:03 less than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:15 more).

Esther Drew at HYROX Birmingham 2024, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,370 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,370 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:05 6:28 faster than 69%
SkiErg: 4:16 4:37 faster than 93%
Run 2: 4:48 5:33 faster than 88%
Sled push: 1:50 1:46 faster than 41%
Run 3: 4:54 5:45 faster than 91%
Sled pull: 3:58 4:01 faster than 52%
Run 4: 5:13 5:50 faster than 81%
Burpee broad jump: 5:48 4:13 faster than 14%
Run 5: 5:08 5:56 faster than 87%
Row: 4:39 5:04 faster than 89%
Run 6: 5:16 5:53 faster than 81%
Farmers carry: 1:23 1:48 faster than 98%
Run 7: 5:14 5:53 faster than 83%
Sandbag lunges: 3:18 3:31 faster than 62%
Run 8: 5:19 6:06 faster than 84%
Wall balls: 3:49 4:22 faster than 84%
Roxzone: 7:50 8:05 faster than 54%
Runs (8 km) 41:53 47:20 faster than 85%
Stations (8) 29:01
Finish 1:18:40 1:24:53 353rd of 1,370 · faster than 74%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. "6 of 8" marks a stations total from the stations that were timed; the others had no split at that race. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group.

Best splits · Open Women

The fastest Esther has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:59 Birmingham 2024 · best of 2 5:16
Sled push 2:30 Madrid 2025 · best of 2 2:55
Sled pull 4:21 Birmingham 2024 · best of 2 5:47
Burpee broad jump 7:36 Birmingham 2024 · best of 2 6:46
Row 5:11 Madrid 2025 · best of 2 5:31
Farmers carry 1:52 Madrid 2025 · best of 2 2:19
Sandbag lunges 5:54 Birmingham 2024 5:13
Wall balls 5:32 Birmingham 2024 · best of 2 6:43
Runs (8 km) 46:15 Birmingham 2024 · best of 2 46:44
Roxzone 7:57 Birmingham 2024 · best of 2 7:57
How to read

Each station's best across Esther's Open Women races, from different races, against the typical Open Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

1 team partner

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Women race

Birmingham 2024, against 1,410 Open Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Estheredge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Esther sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Pull (faster than 92% of the field), weakest on Lunges (faster than 27%).

See the numbers
Part Esther: faster than
Ski 64%
Push 46%
Pull 92%
BBJ 40%
Row 54%
Carry 83%
Lunges 27%
Wall balls 75%
Roxzone 53%
Runs 48%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 64%
Sled push faster than 46%
Sled pull faster than 92%
Burpee broad jump faster than 40%
Row faster than 54%
Farmers carry faster than 83%
Sandbag lunges faster than 27%
Wall balls faster than 75%
Roxzone faster than 53%
Runs (8 km) faster than 48%

How much of the field Esther beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Sled pull (faster than 92%); weakest: Sandbag lunges (faster than 27%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:06 faster
Sled push 0:03 slower
Sled pull 1:20 faster
Burpee broad jump 0:33 slower
Row 0:02 faster
Farmers carry 0:17 faster
Sandbag lunges 0:52 slower
Wall balls 1:13 faster
Roxzone 0:07 faster
Runs (8 km) 0:25 slower

Esther's time on each part against the typical Open Women finisher at this race.Best: Sled pull (1:20 faster); weakest: Sandbag lunges (0:52 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Esther against the typical Open Women finisher

Esther1:32:32
6:014:595:272:435:044:215:427:365:555:235:571:565:545:546:185:327:57
Typical Open Women1:33:38
6:075:055:202:405:325:415:377:035:465:255:392:135:375:026:026:458:04
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Esther: 46:19 running, 38:23 at the stations and 7:57 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (7:36).Below, Typical Open Women: 45:40 running, 39:54 at the stations and 8:04 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (7:03).

See the numbers
Part Esther Typical Open Women
Run 1 6:01 6:07
SkiErg 4:59 5:05
Run 2 5:27 5:20
Sled push 2:43 2:40
Run 3 5:04 5:32
Sled pull 4:21 5:41
Run 4 5:42 5:37
Burpee broad jump 7:36 7:03
Run 5 5:55 5:46
Row 5:23 5:25
Run 6 5:57 5:39
Farmers carry 1:56 2:13
Run 7 5:54 5:37
Sandbag lunges 5:54 5:02
Run 8 6:18 6:02
Wall balls 5:32 6:45
Roxzone 7:57 8:04
Finish 1:32:32 1:34:24

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Sandbag lunges cost 0:52 against the typical Open Women finisher at Birmingham 2024. The sandbag lunges guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix sandbag lunges. Then beat 1:32:32.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report