Athlete · Doubles Women · team 16-24 · GBR GBR

Esme Young

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/esme-young-t-c90fc9

2 HYROX races over 1 season, all in a team with 1 partner. Best Doubles Women time: 1:34:01 at Nice 2026.

Best Doubles Women time1:34:01Nice 2026
Best Doubles Women place1075thof 1,402 · Nice 2026
Latest race1:34:01Nice 2026 · Doubles Women with Imogen KielstraEsme's best Doubles Women time so far
Strongest part of the raceSkiErgfaster than 69% of Doubles Women at Nice 2026

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:35:001:36:001:37:001:38:00 best 1:34:01

This line shows the finish time of Esme Young at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:34:01 at Nice (Feb 2026); Esme Young was 4:16 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Birmingham Oct 2025 Doubles Women 1:38:17
Nice Feb 2026 Doubles Women 1:34:01

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

2 results at 2 races

Tap a result for its full report
Nice 2026 12 Feb 2026
Race results
Doubles Women, team 16-24, with Imogen Kielstra 1:34:01 1075th of 1,402; 112th of 149 aged 16-24 49:26 35:25 9:14 Runs 49:26 · Stations 35:25 · Roxzone 9:14

1,075th of 1,402 Doubles Women (faster than 23%). Against the 43 who finished around 1:33:32: most time gained on the eight runs (3:46), most lost on the roxzone (1:51). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:04 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:54 more).

Esme Young at HYROX Nice 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,402 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,402 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 6:00 6:05 faster than 54%
SkiErg: 4:46 4:55 faster than 68%
Run 2: 5:52 5:44 faster than 42%
Sled push: 1:53 1:39 faster than 19%
Run 3: 5:53 6:00 faster than 57%
Sled pull: 4:27 4:11 faster than 34%
Run 4: 5:58 6:02 faster than 52%
Burpee broad jump: 5:55 4:15 faster than 10%
Run 5: 6:37 6:11 faster than 32%
Row: 5:27 5:07 faster than 19%
Run 6: 6:05 6:05 faster than 50%
Farmers carry: 1:54 1:47 faster than 34%
Run 7: 6:00 6:08 faster than 57%
Sandbag lunges: 5:29 3:54 faster than 5%
Run 8: 7:05 6:06 faster than 19%
Wall balls: 5:34 4:28 faster than 14%
Roxzone: 9:14 6:47 faster than 8%
Runs (8 km) 49:26 48:29 faster than 44%
Stations (8) 35:25
Finish 1:34:01 1:26:07 1075th of 1,402 · faster than 23%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, team 16-24, with Imogen Kielstra 1:38:17 2013th of 2,427; 248th of 300 aged 16-24 54:00 35:24 8:57 Runs 54:00 · Stations 35:24 · Roxzone 8:57

2,013th of 2,427 Doubles Women (faster than 17%). Against the 73 who finished around 1:39:27: most time gained on the eight runs (2:25), most lost on sandbag lunges (1:11). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:26 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 0:49 more).

Esme Young at HYROX Birmingham 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,427 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,427 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 7:30 6:34 faster than 17%
SkiErg: 4:40 4:45 faster than 61%
Run 2: 6:19 5:35 faster than 19%
Sled push: 2:25 1:56 faster than 12%
Run 3: 6:11 5:49 faster than 33%
Sled pull: 4:36 4:20 faster than 36%
Run 4: 6:18 5:54 faster than 32%
Burpee broad jump: 5:41 4:14 faster than 13%
Run 5: 6:11 5:59 faster than 42%
Row: 5:10 5:11 faster than 51%
Run 6: 6:06 5:53 faster than 39%
Farmers carry: 2:07 1:51 faster than 16%
Run 7: 6:07 5:53 faster than 40%
Sandbag lunges: 5:27 3:38 faster than 4%
Run 8: 9:20 5:54 faster than 2%
Wall balls: 5:18 4:23 faster than 15%
Roxzone: 8:57 7:03 faster than 15%
Runs (8 km) 54:00 47:38 faster than 20%
Stations (8) 35:24
Finish 1:38:17 1:25:22 2013th of 2,427 · faster than 17%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group.

Best splits · Doubles Women

The fastest Esme has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:40 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 4:49
Sled push 1:53 Nice 2026 · best of 2 1:52
Sled pull 4:27 Nice 2026 · best of 2 4:13
Burpee broad jump 5:41 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 4:18
Row 5:10 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 5:13
Farmers carry 1:54 Nice 2026 · best of 2 1:52
Sandbag lunges 5:27 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 3:47
Wall balls 5:18 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 4:22
Runs (8 km) 49:26 Nice 2026 · best of 2 49:17
Roxzone 8:57 Birmingham 2025 · best of 2 7:46
How to read

Each station's best across Esme's Doubles Women races, from different races, against the typical Doubles Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

1 team partner

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Doubles Women race

Nice 2026, against 1,402 Doubles Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Esmeedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Esme sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Ski (faster than 69% of the field), weakest on Lunges (faster than 6%).

See the numbers
Part Esme: faster than
Ski 69%
Push 20%
Pull 35%
BBJ 10%
Row 20%
Carry 35%
Lunges 6%
Wall balls 15%
Roxzone 9%
Runs 44%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 69%
Sled push faster than 20%
Sled pull faster than 35%
Burpee broad jump faster than 10%
Row faster than 20%
Farmers carry faster than 35%
Sandbag lunges faster than 6%
Wall balls faster than 15%
Roxzone faster than 9%
Runs (8 km) faster than 44%

How much of the field Esme beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: SkiErg (faster than 69%); weakest: Sandbag lunges (faster than 6%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:09 faster
Sled push 0:14 slower
Sled pull 0:16 slower
Burpee broad jump 1:40 slower
Row 0:20 slower
Farmers carry 0:07 slower
Sandbag lunges 1:35 slower
Wall balls 1:06 slower
Roxzone 2:27 slower
Runs (8 km) 0:57 slower

Esme's time on each part against the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race.Best: SkiErg (0:09 faster); weakest: Roxzone (2:27 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Esme against the typical Doubles Women finisher

Esme1:34:01
6:004:465:521:535:534:275:585:556:375:276:051:546:005:297:055:349:14
Typical Doubles Women1:25:24
6:054:555:441:396:004:116:024:156:115:076:051:476:083:546:064:286:47
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Esme: 49:30 running, 35:25 at the stations and 9:14 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (5:55) and the shortest the sled push (1:53).Below, Typical Doubles Women: 48:20 running, 30:16 at the stations and 6:47 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:07) and the shortest the sled push (1:39).

See the numbers
Part Esme Typical Doubles Women
Run 1 6:00 6:05
SkiErg 4:46 4:55
Run 2 5:52 5:44
Sled push 1:53 1:39
Run 3 5:53 6:00
Sled pull 4:27 4:11
Run 4 5:58 6:02
Burpee broad jump 5:55 4:15
Run 5 6:37 6:11
Row 5:27 5:07
Run 6 6:05 6:05
Farmers carry 1:54 1:47
Run 7 6:00 6:08
Sandbag lunges 5:29 3:54
Run 8 7:05 6:06
Wall balls 5:34 4:28
Roxzone 9:14 6:47
Finish 1:34:01 1:26:07

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Roxzone cost 2:27 against the typical Doubles Women finisher at Nice 2026. The pacing guide is where that time comes back.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix roxzone. Then beat 1:34:01.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report