Athlete · Open Men · 35-39 · NED NED

Mark van Ewijk

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/mark-van-ewijk-514c2037

7 HYROX races over 3 seasons: 3 solo, 4 in a team with 2 partners.

Best Open Men time1:19:30Maastricht 2026
Best Open Men place664thof 2,058 · Maastricht 2026
Latest race1:19:30Maastricht 2026 · Open MenMark's best Open Men time so far
Strongest part of the raceRuns (8 km)faster than 83% of Open Men at Maastricht 2026
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Finish time, race by race: one race type at a time

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:20:001:22:001:24:001:26:00 best 1:19:30 best 1:19:30 · Maastricht

This line shows the finish time of Mark van Ewijk at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:19:30 at Maastricht (Sep 2026); Mark van Ewijk was 7:59 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Rotterdam Feb 2025 Open Men 1:27:29
Amsterdam Jan 2026 Open Men 1:25:08
Maastricht Sep 2026 Open Men 1:19:30

Each dot is one Open Men race; click one for that race's report. From the first Open Men race to the best: 7:59 faster (1:27:29 to 1:19:30).

Every race

7 results at 6 races

Tap a result for its full report
Open Men, 35-39 1:19:30 664th of 2,058; 142nd of 398 aged 35-39 35:19 38:02 6:09† Runs 35:19 · Stations 38:02 · Roxzone 6:09

664th of 2,058 Open Men (faster than 67%). Against the 62 who finished around 1:18:44: most time gained on the eight runs (2:16), most lost on burpee broad jump (2:43). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:37 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:25 more).

Mark van Ewijk at HYROX Maastricht 2026, Open Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Men at this race, and the share of the 2,058 Open Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,058 Open Men here
Run 1: 3:21 3:44 faster than 73%
SkiErg: 4:24 4:29 faster than 63%
Run 2: 4:08 4:53 faster than 85%
Sled push: 2:38 2:57 faster than 72%
Run 3: 4:26 5:14 faster than 85%
Sled pull: 4:27 4:38 faster than 57%
Run 4: 4:27 5:13 faster than 85%
Burpee broad jump: 7:43 5:42 faster than 17%
Run 5: 4:30 5:20 faster than 85%
Row: 4:53 4:54 faster than 51%
Run 6: 4:40 5:15 faster than 75%
Farmers carry: 2:17 2:12 faster than 44%
Run 7: 4:47 5:14 faster than 72%
Sandbag lunges: 6:08 5:10 faster than 27%
Run 8: 5:02 5:51 faster than 81%
Wall balls: 5:32 6:54 faster than 77%
Roxzone †: 6:09
Runs (8 km) 35:19 40:54 faster than 82%
Stations (8) 38:02
Finish 1:19:30 1:26:02 664th of 2,058 · faster than 67%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Amsterdam 2026 21 Jan 2026 · 2 results
Race results
Open Men, 30-34 1:25:08 1484th of 2,802; 352nd of 595 aged 30-34 40:42 38:08 6:23 Runs 40:42 · Stations 38:08 · Roxzone 6:23

1,484th of 2,802 Open Men (faster than 47%). Against the 86 who finished around 1:26:00: most time gained on wall balls (0:44), most lost on sandbag lunges (0:42). Runs 5 to 8 took 3:06 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:39 more).

Mark van Ewijk at HYROX Amsterdam 2026, Open Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Men at this race, and the share of the 2,802 Open Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,802 Open Men here
Run 1: 3:58 3:51 faster than 42%
SkiErg: 4:34 4:27 faster than 34%
Run 2: 4:43 4:46 faster than 53%
Sled push: 2:54 2:58 faster than 55%
Run 3: 5:01 5:05 faster than 53%
Sled pull: 5:16 4:43 faster than 31%
Run 4: 5:07 5:06 faster than 48%
Burpee broad jump: 5:35 5:24 faster than 45%
Run 5: 5:18 5:15 faster than 48%
Row: 5:11 4:44 faster than 15%
Run 6: 5:16 5:08 faster than 43%
Farmers carry: 2:16 2:01 faster than 29%
Run 7: 5:24 5:06 faster than 36%
Sandbag lunges: 5:58 5:06 faster than 27%
Run 8: 5:58 5:53 faster than 47%
Wall balls: 6:24 7:00 faster than 61%
Roxzone: 6:23 6:45 faster than 59%
Runs (8 km) 40:42 40:23 faster than 47%
Stations (8) 38:08
Finish 1:25:08 1:24:13 1484th of 2,802 · faster than 47%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Men, team 35-39, with Wynand Singels 1:11:50 800th of 1,738; 146th of 307 aged 35-39 39:32 26:57 5:25 Runs 39:32 · Stations 26:57 · Roxzone 5:25

800th of 1,738 Doubles Men (faster than 54%). Against the 52 who finished around 1:11:40: most time gained on the roxzone (0:35), most lost on sandbag lunges (0:23). Runs 5 to 8 took 2:18 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:19 more).

Mark van Ewijk at HYROX Amsterdam 2026, Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 1,738 Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,738 Doubles Men here
Run 1: 3:45 3:57 faster than 64%
SkiErg: 4:05 3:58 faster than 32%
Run 2: 4:44 4:47 faster than 53%
Sled push: 2:04 1:53 faster than 27%
Run 3: 5:04 5:05 faster than 50%
Sled pull: 3:29 3:17 faster than 37%
Run 4: 5:06 5:08 faster than 51%
Burpee broad jump: 3:23 3:09 faster than 37%
Run 5: 5:06 5:15 faster than 58%
Row: 4:31 4:25 faster than 37%
Run 6: 5:09 5:11 faster than 52%
Farmers carry: 1:36 1:36 faster than 50%
Run 7: 5:02 5:10 faster than 58%
Sandbag lunges: 3:43 3:26 faster than 34%
Run 8: 5:40 5:40 faster than 50%
Wall balls: 4:06 4:22 faster than 68%
Roxzone: 5:25 6:03 faster than 72%
Runs (8 km) 39:32 40:27 faster than 56%
Stations (8) 26:57
Finish 1:11:50 1:12:40 800th of 1,738 · faster than 54%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Men, team 30-34, with Mark Cillessen 1:15:26 1053rd of 1,918; 340th of 554 aged 30-34 39:57 30:12 5:23 Runs 39:57 · Stations 30:12 · Roxzone 5:23

1,053rd of 1,918 Doubles Men (faster than 45%). Against the 58 who finished around 1:15:27: most time gained on the eight runs (2:07), most lost on burpee broad jump (2:32). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:50 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:33 more).

Mark van Ewijk at HYROX Madrid 2025, Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 1,918 Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,918 Doubles Men here
Run 1: 4:38 4:44 faster than 55%
SkiErg: 4:22 4:17 faster than 38%
Run 2: 4:41 4:49 faster than 58%
Sled push: 2:08 1:54 faster than 23%
Run 3: 4:51 5:06 faster than 62%
Sled pull: 3:33 3:10 faster than 25%
Run 4: 4:56 5:06 faster than 59%
Burpee broad jump: 5:43 3:10 faster than 1%
Run 5: 5:10 5:15 faster than 53%
Row: 4:42 4:27 faster than 23%
Run 6: 5:07 5:09 faster than 51%
Farmers carry: 1:48 1:44 faster than 40%
Run 7: 4:55 5:06 faster than 58%
Sandbag lunges: 3:35 3:30 faster than 44%
Run 8: 5:42 5:49 faster than 55%
Wall balls: 4:21 4:13 faster than 41%
Roxzone: 5:23 6:15 faster than 77%
Runs (8 km) 39:57 41:14 faster than 58%
Stations (8) 30:12
Finish 1:15:26 1:14:13 1053rd of 1,918 · faster than 45%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Men, team 30-34, with Mark Cillessen 1:10:34 387th of 1,175; 108th of 258 aged 30-34 39:18 24:51‡ 6:30 Runs 39:18 · Stations 24:51 · Roxzone 6:30

387th of 1,175 Doubles Men (faster than 67%). Against the 37 who finished around 1:11:13: most time gained on sled push (0:06), most lost on burpee broad jump (1:05). Runs 5 to 8 took 0:31 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:15 more).

Mark van Ewijk at HYROX Maastricht Sep 2025, Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 1,175 Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,175 Doubles Men here
Run 1: 5:00 4:56 faster than 47%
SkiErg: 4:04 3:59 faster than 38%
Run 2: 4:41 4:45 faster than 54%
Sled push: 1:29 1:36 faster than 73%
Run 3: 4:51 5:04 faster than 62%
Sled pull: 3:40 3:19 faster than 29%
Run 4: 4:53 5:08 faster than 64%
Burpee broad jump: 4:13 3:18 faster than 16%
Run 5: 4:51 5:19 faster than 72%
Row: 4:41 4:26 faster than 23%
Run 6: 4:53 5:11 faster than 66%
Farmers carry: 1:30 1:37 faster than 72%
Run 7: 4:49 5:09 faster than 67%
Sandbag lunges: 3:50 3:31 faster than 35%
Run 8: 5:23 5:32 faster than 55%
Wall balls: 1:24 ‡ 4:41
Roxzone: 6:30 6:40 faster than 55%
Runs (8 km) 39:18 40:59 faster than 63%
Stations (8) 24:51
Finish 1:10:34 1:14:50 387th of 1,175 · faster than 67%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Open Men, 30-34 1:27:29 1280th of 2,469; 329th of 561 aged 30-34 43:23 38:20 5:50 Runs 43:23 · Stations 38:20 · Roxzone 5:50

1,280th of 2,469 Open Men (faster than 48%). Against the 73 who finished around 1:26:37: most time gained on the roxzone (0:59), most lost on farmers carry (2:16). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:59 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:34 more).

Mark van Ewijk at HYROX Rotterdam 2025, Open Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Open Men at this race, and the share of the 2,469 Open Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,469 Open Men here
Run 1: 5:17 5:09 faster than 42%
SkiErg: 4:21 4:25 faster than 60%
Run 2: 4:52 4:54 faster than 51%
Sled push: 2:33 2:48 faster than 70%
Run 3: 5:13 5:15 faster than 51%
Sled pull: 4:37 5:06 faster than 67%
Run 4: 5:22 5:17 faster than 46%
Burpee broad jump: 5:28 5:45 faster than 57%
Run 5: 5:34 5:31 faster than 47%
Row: 4:46 4:45 faster than 47%
Run 6: 5:25 5:19 faster than 45%
Farmers carry: 4:21 2:07 faster than 0%
Run 7: 5:30 5:18 faster than 41%
Sandbag lunges: 6:14 5:05 faster than 23%
Run 8: 6:13 5:59 faster than 43%
Wall balls: 6:00 5:58 faster than 49%
Roxzone: 5:50 6:51 faster than 74%
Runs (8 km) 43:23 43:09 faster than 49%
Stations (8) 38:20
Finish 1:27:29 1:26:37 1280th of 2,469 · faster than 48%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Men, team 30-39, with Mark Cillessen 1:15:13 443rd of 820; 221st of 365 aged 30-39 38:28* 24:59*‡ 16:41 Runs 38:28 · Stations 24:59 · Roxzone 16:41

443rd of 820 Doubles Men (faster than 46%).

Mark van Ewijk at HYROX Maastricht Feb 2025, Doubles Men: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Men at this race, and the share of the 820 Doubles Men finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 820 Doubles Men here
Run 1: 7:09 6:49 faster than 38%
SkiErg: 3:51 3:59 faster than 73%
Run 2: 6:22 4:42 faster than 5%
Sled push: 1:26 1:32 faster than 70%
Run 3: 4:47 4:55 faster than 58%
Sled pull: 3:06 2:55 faster than 36%
Run 4: 4:58 5:00 faster than 52%
Burpee broad jump: 3:37 3:10 faster than 29%
Run 5: —
Row: 4:28 4:25 faster than 45%
Run 6: 4:53 5:04 faster than 59%
Farmers carry: 0:48 ‡ 1:31
Run 7: — 5:05
Sandbag lunges: 3:44 3:18 faster than 27%
Run 8: 13:01 5:05 faster than 0%
Wall balls: 3:59 3:52 faster than 39%
Roxzone: 16:41 6:11 faster than 1%
Runs (8 km) 38:28 36:43 faster than 40%
Stations (8) 24:59
Finish 1:15:13 1:13:57 443rd of 820 · faster than 46%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. ‡ The organiser timed all eight stations and the total is theirs, but one split is not used in comparisons: it was under our floor for that station (just under the fastest Elite 15 splits ever), which usually means a timing slip at the mats or a short course. Open the splits to see it. † This venue did not time the roxzone: the figure is the finish minus runs and stations, and part of the walk is inside the run laps there, so it is shorter than at other venues. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Open Men

The fastest Mark has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:21 Rotterdam 2025 · best of 3 4:34
Sled push 2:33 Rotterdam 2025 · best of 3 3:04
Sled pull 4:27 Maastricht 2026 · best of 3 4:57
Burpee broad jump 5:28 Rotterdam 2025 · best of 3 5:38
Row 4:46 Rotterdam 2025 · best of 3 4:53
Farmers carry 2:16 Amsterdam 2026 · best of 3 2:11
Sandbag lunges 5:58 Amsterdam 2026 · best of 3 5:20
Wall balls 5:32 Maastricht 2026 · best of 3 7:03
Runs (8 km) 35:19 Maastricht 2026 · best of 3 41:47
Roxzone 5:50 Rotterdam 2025 · best of 2 7:23
How to read

Each station's best across Mark's Open Men races, from different races, against the typical Open Men split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

2 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Open Men race

Maastricht 2026, against 2,058 Open Men

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Markedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Mark sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Runs (faster than 83% of the field), weakest on BBJ (faster than 18%).

See the numbers
Part Mark: faster than
Ski 64%
Push 73%
Pull 57%
BBJ 18%
Row 52%
Carry 44%
Lunges 28%
Wall balls 77%
Roxzone 83%
Runs 83%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 64%
Sled push faster than 73%
Sled pull faster than 57%
Burpee broad jump faster than 18%
Row faster than 52%
Farmers carry faster than 44%
Sandbag lunges faster than 28%
Wall balls faster than 77%
Roxzone faster than 83%
Runs (8 km) faster than 83%

How much of the field Mark beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (faster than 83%); weakest: Burpee broad jump (faster than 18%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:05 faster
Sled push 0:19 faster
Sled pull 0:11 faster
Burpee broad jump 2:01 slower
Row 0:01 faster
Farmers carry 0:05 slower
Sandbag lunges 0:58 slower
Wall balls 1:22 faster
Roxzone 1:31 faster
Runs (8 km) 5:35 faster

Mark's time on each part against the typical Open Men finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (5:35 faster); weakest: Burpee broad jump (2:01 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Open Men finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Mark against the typical Open Men finisher

Mark1:19:30
3:214:244:082:384:264:274:277:434:304:534:402:174:476:085:025:326:09
Typical Open Men1:25:20
3:444:294:532:575:144:385:135:425:204:545:152:125:145:105:516:547:40
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Mark: 35:20 running, 38:01 at the stations and 6:09 in the roxzone; the longest station was the burpee broad jumps (7:43).Below, Typical Open Men: 40:44 running, 36:57 at the stations and 7:40 in the roxzone; the longest station was the wall balls (6:54).

See the numbers
Part Mark Typical Open Men
Run 1 3:21 3:44
SkiErg 4:24 4:29
Run 2 4:08 4:53
Sled push 2:38 2:57
Run 3 4:26 5:14
Sled pull 4:27 4:38
Run 4 4:27 5:13
Burpee broad jump 7:43 5:42
Run 5 4:30 5:20
Row 4:53 4:54
Run 6 4:40 5:15
Farmers carry 2:17 2:12
Run 7 4:47 5:14
Sandbag lunges 6:08 5:10
Run 8 5:02 5:51
Wall balls 5:32 6:54
Roxzone 6:09 7:40
Finish 1:19:30 1:26:02

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Burpee broad jump cost 2:01 against the typical Open Men finisher at Maastricht 2026. The burpee broad jump guide shows whether that is strength or pacing, and the workouts that fix it.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Fix burpee broad jump. Then beat 1:19:30.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report