Athlete · Doubles Women · team 25-29 · NED NED

Elisa de Jongh

www.roxtimes.com/athletes/elisa-de-jongh-t-01cce3

4 HYROX races over 2 seasons, all in a team with 4 partners.

Best Doubles Women time1:15:49Rotterdam 2026
Best Doubles Women place259thof 2,052 · Rotterdam 2026
Latest race1:15:49Rotterdam 2026 · Doubles Women with Jaccoline van der BurgElisa's best Doubles Women time so far
Strongest part of the raceSkiErgfaster than 93% of Doubles Women at Rotterdam 2026
Personal bests

One best per race type

solo, doubles and relay times are different races, so each has its own best

Doubles Women: finish time, race by race

Oldest to newest; a line going down means getting faster
1:16:001:20:001:24:001:28:00 best 1:15:49 best 1:15:49 · Rotterdam

This line shows the finish time of Elisa de Jongh at each race, oldest on the left; lower is faster.The best was 1:15:49 at Rotterdam (Apr 2026); Elisa de Jongh was 12:21 faster at the latest race than at the first.

See the numbers
Race Date Division Finish
Maastricht Feb 2025 Doubles Women 1:28:10
Paris Oct 2025 Doubles Women 1:19:39
Rotterdam Apr 2026 Doubles Women 1:15:49

Each dot is one Doubles Women race; click one for that race's report. Not enough complete, clean Doubles Women races yet to measure the change. Team times are shared with a partner, so they move with who you race with.

Every race

4 results at 4 races

Tap a result for its full report
Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Jaccoline van der Burg 1:15:49 259th of 2,052; 101st of 586 aged 25-29 41:42 27:54 6:18 Runs 41:42 · Stations 27:54 · Roxzone 6:18

259th of 2,052 Doubles Women (faster than 87%). Against the 62 who finished around 1:16:39: most time gained on the eight runs (1:03), most lost on sled pull (0:21). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:00 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:15 more).

Elisa de Jongh at HYROX Rotterdam 2026, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 2,052 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 2,052 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:13 6:00 faster than 86%
SkiErg: 4:33 4:57 faster than 92%
Run 2: 4:41 5:38 faster than 92%
Sled push: 1:44 1:41 faster than 42%
Run 3: 5:11 5:57 faster than 85%
Sled pull: 3:45 3:46 faster than 51%
Run 4: 5:18 6:01 faster than 82%
Burpee broad jump: 3:45 4:24 faster than 76%
Run 5: 5:06 6:06 faster than 91%
Row: 5:15 5:12 faster than 44%
Run 6: 5:06 6:04 faster than 90%
Farmers carry: 1:42 1:51 faster than 73%
Run 7: 5:21 6:07 faster than 83%
Sandbag lunges: 3:30 3:40 faster than 61%
Run 8: 5:50 6:56 faster than 87%
Wall balls: 3:40 4:20 faster than 91%
Roxzone: 6:18 7:26 faster than 79%
Runs (8 km) 41:42 49:03 faster than 88%
Stations (8) 27:54
Finish 1:15:49 1:26:19 259th of 2,052 · faster than 87%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Paris 2025 23 Oct 2025
Race results
Doubles Women, team 25-29, with Sandra Van Meeteren 1:19:39 303rd of 1,691; 113th of 590 aged 25-29 45:14 28:44 5:46 Runs 45:14 · Stations 28:44 · Roxzone 5:46

303rd of 1,691 Doubles Women (faster than 82%). Against the 50 who finished around 1:20:30: most time gained on the roxzone (0:26), most lost on farmers carry (0:37). Runs 5 to 8 took 1:09 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 1:22 more).

Elisa de Jongh at HYROX Paris 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 1,691 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,691 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 5:17 5:25 faster than 57%
SkiErg: 4:35 4:44 faster than 67%
Run 2: 5:35 6:08 faster than 77%
Sled push: 1:47 1:54 faster than 68%
Run 3: 5:38 6:23 faster than 83%
Sled pull: 3:57 4:24 faster than 75%
Run 4: 5:35 6:24 faster than 84%
Burpee broad jump: 3:43 4:21 faster than 75%
Run 5: 5:37 6:28 faster than 84%
Row: 5:02 5:05 faster than 56%
Run 6: 5:41 6:26 faster than 82%
Farmers carry: 2:17 1:48 faster than 4%
Run 7: 5:45 6:29 faster than 81%
Sandbag lunges: 3:41 4:05 faster than 72%
Run 8: 6:10 6:51 faster than 76%
Wall balls: 3:42 4:30 faster than 93%
Roxzone: 5:46 6:59 faster than 85%
Runs (8 km) 45:14 50:43 faster than 81%
Stations (8) 28:44
Finish 1:19:39 1:28:37 303rd of 1,691 · faster than 82%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Mixed, team 25-29, with Terence Rijsenbrij 1:32:14 724th of 1,026; 217th of 271 aged 25-29 52:39 31:43 7:56 Runs 52:39 · Stations 31:43 · Roxzone 7:56

724th of 1,026 Doubles Mixed (faster than 29%). Against the 30 who finished around 1:31:59: most time gained on the roxzone (0:49), most lost on the eight runs (2:18). Runs 5 to 8 took 4:16 more than runs 1 to 4 (them: 2:24 more).

Elisa de Jongh at HYROX Maastricht Sep 2025, Doubles Mixed: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Mixed at this race, and the share of the 1,026 Doubles Mixed finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 1,026 Doubles Mixed here
Run 1: 5:30 5:33 faster than 51%
SkiErg: 4:16 4:15 faster than 49%
Run 2: 5:45 5:22 faster than 32%
Sled push: 1:51 1:56 faster than 63%
Run 3: 6:26 5:39 faster than 19%
Sled pull: 4:14 4:15 faster than 50%
Run 4: 6:33 5:44 faster than 19%
Burpee broad jump: 4:57 3:54 faster than 17%
Run 5: 7:24 6:00 faster than 14%
Row: 4:50 4:48 faster than 45%
Run 6: 6:49 5:53 faster than 20%
Farmers carry: 1:53 1:50 faster than 42%
Run 7: 6:47 5:53 faster than 21%
Sandbag lunges: 3:51 4:04 faster than 59%
Run 8: 7:30 6:20 faster than 22%
Wall balls: 5:51 4:57 faster than 27%
Roxzone: 7:56 7:45 faster than 45%
Runs (8 km) 52:39 46:38 faster than 21%
Stations (8) 31:43
Finish 1:32:14 1:24:54 724th of 1,026 · faster than 29%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

Doubles Women, with Sannah Van Gemert 1:28:10 449th of 665 46:29* 27:24* 8:05 Runs 46:29 · Stations 27:24 · Roxzone 8:05

449th of 665 Doubles Women (faster than 32%).

Elisa de Jongh at HYROX Maastricht Feb 2025, Doubles Women: every split in race order, the typical split of Doubles Women at this race, and the share of the 665 Doubles Women finishers here who were slower on that part.
Part Time Typical here vs 665 Doubles Women here
Run 1: 8:27 7:52 faster than 27%
SkiErg: 4:37 4:37 faster than 50%
Run 2: 6:09 5:28 faster than 18%
Sled push: 1:37 1:33 faster than 39%
Run 3: 6:16 5:36 faster than 18%
Sled pull: 3:38 3:37 faster than 48%
Run 4: 6:15 5:41 faster than 22%
Burpee broad jump: 3:33 3:57 faster than 67%
Run 5: —
Row: 5:11 5:01 faster than 31%
Run 6: 6:26 5:44 faster than 20%
Farmers carry: 1:53 1:43 faster than 30%
Run 7: 6:34 5:46 faster than 18%
Sandbag lunges: 3:10 3:18 faster than 60%
Run 8: 6:24 5:48 faster than 27%
Wall balls: 3:45 3:50 faster than 58%
Roxzone: 8:05 6:54 faster than 29%
Runs (8 km) 46:29 42:11 faster than 22%
Stations (8) 27:24
Finish 1:28:10 1:23:14 449th of 665 · faster than 32%

Full report for this race →This result as data (JSON)

How to read

Place is the position among timed finishers in the same race, division and gender; a doubles place is the team's. Runs is the organiser's official run total (it can differ from the eight laps added up by a few seconds), stations the eight stations added up, and roxzone the time moving between them. The age group is the one entered for that race; for a team it is the team’s age group. * At that edition running was under 44% of the typical finish (48% is normal): the timing mats counted some running as station time, so its runs look faster and its stations slower than they were.

Best splits · Doubles Women

The fastest Elisa has done each station

Part Best Race Typical
SkiErg 4:33 Rotterdam 2026 · best of 3 4:49
Sled push 1:37 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 3 1:52
Sled pull 3:38 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 3 4:13
Burpee broad jump 3:33 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 3 4:18
Row 5:02 Paris 2025 · best of 3 5:13
Farmers carry 1:42 Rotterdam 2026 · best of 3 1:52
Sandbag lunges 3:10 Maastricht Feb 2025 · best of 3 3:47
Wall balls 3:40 Rotterdam 2026 · best of 3 4:22
Runs (8 km) 41:42 Rotterdam 2026 · best of 3 49:17
Roxzone 5:46 Paris 2025 · best of 3 7:46
How to read

Each station's best across Elisa's Doubles Women races, from different races, against the typical Doubles Women split. Venues differ (sled carpets, run laps, where the mats sit), so a best can owe something to the venue.

Raced with

4 team partners

From the team results above. A name opens the search: a partner can have more than one page.

Station profile · best Doubles Women race

Rotterdam 2026, against 2,052 Doubles Women

Full race report →

Shape of the race

50% top SkiPushPullBBJRowCarryLungesWall ballsRoxzoneRuns
Elisaedge = faster than everyone, centre = slowest

This chart shows where Elisa sat in the field on each part of the race: the edge is faster than everyone, the centre is the slowest.Strongest on Ski (faster than 93% of the field), weakest on Push (faster than 43%).

See the numbers
Part Elisa: faster than
Ski 93%
Push 43%
Pull 52%
BBJ 76%
Row 44%
Carry 74%
Lunges 62%
Wall balls 92%
Roxzone 79%
Runs 89%

Further out means you beat more of the field on that part. A dent is a weak spot.

How you ranked on each station

SkiErg faster than 93%
Sled push faster than 43%
Sled pull faster than 52%
Burpee broad jump faster than 76%
Row faster than 44%
Farmers carry faster than 74%
Sandbag lunges faster than 62%
Wall balls faster than 92%
Roxzone faster than 79%
Runs (8 km) faster than 89%

How much of the field Elisa beat on each part of the race, at this race.Best: SkiErg (faster than 93%); weakest: Sled push (faster than 43%).

Longer is better: the share of the field you beat.

Minutes against the typical finisher

SkiErg 0:24 faster
Sled push 0:03 slower
Sled pull 0:01 faster
Burpee broad jump 0:39 faster
Row 0:03 slower
Farmers carry 0:09 faster
Sandbag lunges 0:10 faster
Wall balls 0:40 faster
Roxzone 1:08 faster
Runs (8 km) 7:21 faster

Elisa's time on each part against the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race.Best: Runs (8 km) (7:21 faster); weakest: Sled push (0:03 slower).

Green, left of centre: faster than the typical Doubles Women finisher at this race. Orange, right: slower, and by how much.

The race as one bar: Elisa against the typical Doubles Women finisher

Elisa1:15:49
5:134:334:411:445:113:455:183:455:065:155:061:425:213:305:503:406:18
Typical Doubles Women1:26:06
6:004:575:381:415:573:466:014:246:065:126:041:516:073:406:564:207:26
RunsStationsRoxzone (moving between stations)

This chart draws the race in order, left to right: each 1 km run (blue), each station (yellow) and the roxzone (grey), sized by its time.Elisa: 41:46 running, 27:54 at the stations and 6:18 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:15).Below, Typical Doubles Women: 48:49 running, 29:51 at the stations and 7:26 in the roxzone; the longest station was the row (5:12) and the shortest the sled push (1:41).

See the numbers
Part Elisa Typical Doubles Women
Run 1 5:13 6:00
SkiErg 4:33 4:57
Run 2 4:41 5:38
Sled push 1:44 1:41
Run 3 5:11 5:57
Sled pull 3:45 3:46
Run 4 5:18 6:01
Burpee broad jump 3:45 4:24
Run 5 5:06 6:06
Row 5:15 5:12
Run 6 5:06 6:04
Farmers carry 1:42 1:51
Run 7 5:21 6:07
Sandbag lunges 3:30 3:40
Run 8 5:50 6:56
Wall balls 3:40 4:20
Roxzone 6:18 7:26
Finish 1:15:49 1:26:19

The race in order, left to right. A wider block than the one below is slower than typical.

Is this you?

Get your next race report by email

One email the night your next race is processed, with your full report. Nothing else, unsubscribe with one tap.

The RoxHype app

Training for the next one? Let's beat 1:15:49.

The RoxHype app is your training plan to race day: built from your splits, your kit and your race date, and adjusted every week.

  • A week-by-week plan that counts down to your race
  • Extra work on your slowest stations
  • Adjusts every week to what you actually did

Free to download. Used by more than 40,000 HYROX athletes.

RoxHype app home: days to your HYROX, your expected finish range and this week's sessions RoxHype workout player guiding a sled push, with the next exercise lined up
See my race report